Assessment of the effectiveness and efficiency of two fishways with vertical slot openings in an Alpine River (Toce River, northern Italy)

IF 4.1 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Ecological Engineering Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-31 DOI:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2025.107535
Mattia Iaia , Silvia Quadroni , Stefano Brignone , Armando Piccinini , Roberta Bettinetti , Pietro Volta
{"title":"Assessment of the effectiveness and efficiency of two fishways with vertical slot openings in an Alpine River (Toce River, northern Italy)","authors":"Mattia Iaia ,&nbsp;Silvia Quadroni ,&nbsp;Stefano Brignone ,&nbsp;Armando Piccinini ,&nbsp;Roberta Bettinetti ,&nbsp;Pietro Volta","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2025.107535","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Weirs and dams impede the longitudinal connectivity of rivers and create obstacles to free fish migrations. Blue infrastructures, such as fishways, have been implemented to restore river connectivity over the last 20 years. However, after construction, issues regarding the functionality and effectiveness of fishways often remain. In this study, we investigated the effectiveness and efficiency of two step-pool fishways with vertical slot openings (i.e., Tana and Prata fishways), in the Toce River, an Alpine River tributary of Lake Maggiore. We carried out this investigation over two years by using combined technologies: PIT tag telemetry and video monitoring, taking into account the fish size and river discharge. Fishways were suitable and utilized by trout (<em>Salmo</em> spp.), barbels (<em>Barbus</em> spp.), chub (<em>Squalius squalus</em>) and dace (<em>Telestes muticellus</em>), but not for bullhead (<em>Cottus gobio</em>). Additionally, we PIT tagged both wild and hatchery-reared trout, to compare the use of the fishways by wild and hatchery fish. The passage efficiency was 65.4 % for the Tana fishway and 60.0 % for the Prata fishway, corresponding to values within the range found in the literature. On the other hand, attraction efficiency was very low. Our observations suggest that finding and entering the fishways was more challenging than completing the passage. Most passages occurred in autumn and spring, in relation to spawning migration and high-flow periods. Slight differences were recorded between the two fishways, with longer transit times for the Tana fishway and better performance for adult wild trout at the Prata fishway. The combination of telemetry and video monitoring provided important information to guide future river defragmentation projects in the area and for similar water basins.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"212 ","pages":"Article 107535"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857425000230","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Weirs and dams impede the longitudinal connectivity of rivers and create obstacles to free fish migrations. Blue infrastructures, such as fishways, have been implemented to restore river connectivity over the last 20 years. However, after construction, issues regarding the functionality and effectiveness of fishways often remain. In this study, we investigated the effectiveness and efficiency of two step-pool fishways with vertical slot openings (i.e., Tana and Prata fishways), in the Toce River, an Alpine River tributary of Lake Maggiore. We carried out this investigation over two years by using combined technologies: PIT tag telemetry and video monitoring, taking into account the fish size and river discharge. Fishways were suitable and utilized by trout (Salmo spp.), barbels (Barbus spp.), chub (Squalius squalus) and dace (Telestes muticellus), but not for bullhead (Cottus gobio). Additionally, we PIT tagged both wild and hatchery-reared trout, to compare the use of the fishways by wild and hatchery fish. The passage efficiency was 65.4 % for the Tana fishway and 60.0 % for the Prata fishway, corresponding to values within the range found in the literature. On the other hand, attraction efficiency was very low. Our observations suggest that finding and entering the fishways was more challenging than completing the passage. Most passages occurred in autumn and spring, in relation to spawning migration and high-flow periods. Slight differences were recorded between the two fishways, with longer transit times for the Tana fishway and better performance for adult wild trout at the Prata fishway. The combination of telemetry and video monitoring provided important information to guide future river defragmentation projects in the area and for similar water basins.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿尔卑斯河(意大利北部托切河)两条垂直开槽鱼道的有效性和效率评估
堰和坝阻碍了河流的纵向连通性,并对鱼类的自由洄游造成了障碍。在过去的20年里,已经实施了蓝色基础设施,如鱼道,以恢复河流的连通性。然而,在建造之后,关于鱼道的功能和有效性的问题往往仍然存在。在本研究中,我们研究了马焦雷湖(Lake Maggiore)的一条高山河流支流托策河(Toce River)中两个垂直开槽的阶梯池鱼道(即Tana和Prata鱼道)的有效性和效率。考虑到鱼的大小和河流流量,我们在两年多的时间里采用了PIT标签遥测和视频监控相结合的技术进行了这项调查。鳟鱼(Salmo spp)、梭子鱼(Barbus spp)、鱼(Squalius squalus)和鲮鱼(Telestes muticellus)适合和利用鱼道,但不适合牛头鱼(Cottus gobio)。此外,我们对野生和孵化场饲养的鳟鱼进行了PIT标记,以比较野生和孵化场鱼类对鱼道的使用。塔纳鱼道的通过率为65.4%,普拉塔鱼道的通过率为60.0%,均在文献中发现的范围内。另一方面,吸引效率很低。我们的观察表明,寻找和进入鱼道比完成通道更具挑战性。大多数通道发生在秋季和春季,与产卵洄游和高流量期有关。两种鱼道之间略有差异,Tana鱼道的过境时间较长,而Prata鱼道的成年野生鳟鱼表现较好。遥测与视频监测的结合为指导该地区和类似流域未来的河流碎片化工程提供了重要信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Engineering
Ecological Engineering 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
293
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers. Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.
期刊最新文献
Factors influencing spontaneous plant diversity and insect herbivory on extensive green roofs Enhancing agricultural soil fertility and improving crop yield with the sediment dredged from the treatment wetland Modeling cumulative and spatially-varying nitrate removal from multiple floodplain restoration projects in a 4th-order river channel network Long-term assessment of chestnut live cribwalls deterioration using drilling resistance measurements Enhancing urban wastewater treatment through nature-based solutions: The role of biofilm–plant development in subsurface retention of multiple solutes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1