{"title":"Treatment wetlands in Iran: A review","authors":"Amir Gholipour","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper presents a comprehensive review and meta-analysis of treatment wetland technology trends and effectiveness in Iran since the 1990s. A web search identified 69 relevant studies since 1998, highlighting various types of treatment wetlands designed at pilot and full scales. Horizontal subsurface flow (HSSF) systems and hybrid wetlands were most investigated, while full-scale studies were relatively scarce. Treatment wetlands were evaluated under diverse climatic conditions, particularly the Csa climate of the Köppen classification, with a primary focus on domestic (66 %) and industrial (14 %) wastewater treatment. Applications also extended to agriculture, leachate, aquaculture, greywater, livestock, and pharmaceuticals. The meta-analysis revealed the prevalent use of sand and gravel (15 ± 10.09 mm) as substrates, although contemporary materials like zeolite are emerging. Among 31 identified plant species, <em>Phragmites australis</em> was most frequently utilized. Key design criteria, such as hydraulic retention time (HRT), hydraulic loading rate (HLR), and the width-to-length ratio of reed beds, were estimated. HRT and HLR for HSSF wetlands were 3.35 ± 2.16 days and 10 ± 2 cm.day<sup>-1</sup>, respectively, while hybrid wetlands were 4.15 ± 1.80 days and 59 ± 25 cm.day<sup>-1</sup>. Effective operation and maintenance, including periodic vegetation harvest and even influent distribution, were crucial for optimal performance. HSSF and hybrid systems showed significant efficiency in removing various pollutants, with hybrid systems excelling in nitrogen removal due to oxygen variability in vertical and horizontal reed beds. This study emphasizes the potential of treatment wetlands as a sustainable alternative to conventional systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"212 ","pages":"Article 107494"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857424003197","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper presents a comprehensive review and meta-analysis of treatment wetland technology trends and effectiveness in Iran since the 1990s. A web search identified 69 relevant studies since 1998, highlighting various types of treatment wetlands designed at pilot and full scales. Horizontal subsurface flow (HSSF) systems and hybrid wetlands were most investigated, while full-scale studies were relatively scarce. Treatment wetlands were evaluated under diverse climatic conditions, particularly the Csa climate of the Köppen classification, with a primary focus on domestic (66 %) and industrial (14 %) wastewater treatment. Applications also extended to agriculture, leachate, aquaculture, greywater, livestock, and pharmaceuticals. The meta-analysis revealed the prevalent use of sand and gravel (15 ± 10.09 mm) as substrates, although contemporary materials like zeolite are emerging. Among 31 identified plant species, Phragmites australis was most frequently utilized. Key design criteria, such as hydraulic retention time (HRT), hydraulic loading rate (HLR), and the width-to-length ratio of reed beds, were estimated. HRT and HLR for HSSF wetlands were 3.35 ± 2.16 days and 10 ± 2 cm.day-1, respectively, while hybrid wetlands were 4.15 ± 1.80 days and 59 ± 25 cm.day-1. Effective operation and maintenance, including periodic vegetation harvest and even influent distribution, were crucial for optimal performance. HSSF and hybrid systems showed significant efficiency in removing various pollutants, with hybrid systems excelling in nitrogen removal due to oxygen variability in vertical and horizontal reed beds. This study emphasizes the potential of treatment wetlands as a sustainable alternative to conventional systems.
期刊介绍:
Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers.
Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.