{"title":"Are riparian buffer strips effective for nutrient retention under cold frozen conditions?","authors":"Mathieu Nsenga Kumwimba , Xuyong Li , Jinlou Huang , Mawuli Dzakpasu , Binessi Edouard Ifon , Diana Kavidia Muyembe , Salma Akter , Yufan Zhang , Awoke Guadie , Benjamin Manirakiza","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Riparian buffer zones (RBZs) are commonly employed as a nature-based solution to mitigate the transport of nutrients from cultivated lands to freshwater bodies. However, effectively retaining nutrients in cold conditions presents a challenge. This is due to the fact that herbaceous vegetation wilts during winter, becoming covered by snow and ice, and unable to actively absorb pollutants. Additionally, frozen soils restrict or completely prevent infiltration. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of buffers in reducing nutrient levels in agricultural overland flow in a semi-arid region of northern China. Runoff monitoring was conducted using twelve steel flumes, established at both the inflow and outflow of the RBZs at each site along the predicted overland flow path. Furthermore, phosphorus (P) concentrations were estimated in RBZ soil samples taken along the runoff flow line to gain further insights into nutrient dynamics within various RBZs. Analysis of runoff samples from 35 events throughout the study demonstrated that, in most instances, buffers have minimal to no impact on reducing the levels of nitrogen (N) and P species under snowmelt-generated runoff. Although the influence of buffers on nutrients was limited during the snowmelt period, they performed better during summer than in the autumn, resulting in a moderate reduction of TN and TP levels in 83 % of the sites. Furthermore, the available P concentrations in the soil of 50 % of the studied buffers were considerably higher than in cropland soils. The subpar performance of buffers in retaining nutrient in the studied area can potentially be attributed to the fact that most of the overland flow is concentrated (rather than uniform sheet flow) via narrow fractions across buffers, and this occurs specifically during snowmelt when biogeochemical mechanisms (e.g., sorption, infiltration, plant and microbial assimilation) responsible for nutrient removal in buffers are limited. This study also revealed that the percentage of water extractable N and P released from various species subjected to 0, 3, or 6 freeze-thaw cycles varied from 6.13 to 68.90 % and 10.60–73.46 %, respectively. Future research efforts should focus on identifying alternative management measures that enhance nutrient removal during concentrated snowmelt runoff periods in these low-temperature areas.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"212 ","pages":"Article 107512"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857424003379","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Riparian buffer zones (RBZs) are commonly employed as a nature-based solution to mitigate the transport of nutrients from cultivated lands to freshwater bodies. However, effectively retaining nutrients in cold conditions presents a challenge. This is due to the fact that herbaceous vegetation wilts during winter, becoming covered by snow and ice, and unable to actively absorb pollutants. Additionally, frozen soils restrict or completely prevent infiltration. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of buffers in reducing nutrient levels in agricultural overland flow in a semi-arid region of northern China. Runoff monitoring was conducted using twelve steel flumes, established at both the inflow and outflow of the RBZs at each site along the predicted overland flow path. Furthermore, phosphorus (P) concentrations were estimated in RBZ soil samples taken along the runoff flow line to gain further insights into nutrient dynamics within various RBZs. Analysis of runoff samples from 35 events throughout the study demonstrated that, in most instances, buffers have minimal to no impact on reducing the levels of nitrogen (N) and P species under snowmelt-generated runoff. Although the influence of buffers on nutrients was limited during the snowmelt period, they performed better during summer than in the autumn, resulting in a moderate reduction of TN and TP levels in 83 % of the sites. Furthermore, the available P concentrations in the soil of 50 % of the studied buffers were considerably higher than in cropland soils. The subpar performance of buffers in retaining nutrient in the studied area can potentially be attributed to the fact that most of the overland flow is concentrated (rather than uniform sheet flow) via narrow fractions across buffers, and this occurs specifically during snowmelt when biogeochemical mechanisms (e.g., sorption, infiltration, plant and microbial assimilation) responsible for nutrient removal in buffers are limited. This study also revealed that the percentage of water extractable N and P released from various species subjected to 0, 3, or 6 freeze-thaw cycles varied from 6.13 to 68.90 % and 10.60–73.46 %, respectively. Future research efforts should focus on identifying alternative management measures that enhance nutrient removal during concentrated snowmelt runoff periods in these low-temperature areas.
期刊介绍:
Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers.
Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.