Decoding covert visual attention to motion direction using graph theory features of EEG signals and quadratic discriminant analysis

IF 5.8 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Computers in human behavior reports Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-03 DOI:10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100544
Zeinab Rezaei, Mohammad-Mahdi Mohammadi, Mohammad Reza Daliri
{"title":"Decoding covert visual attention to motion direction using graph theory features of EEG signals and quadratic discriminant analysis","authors":"Zeinab Rezaei,&nbsp;Mohammad-Mahdi Mohammadi,&nbsp;Mohammad Reza Daliri","doi":"10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100544","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Visual attention is a type of selective attention that plays an important role in prioritizing and processing the information received from the visual scenes around us. The brain is an intricate network composed of numerous regions, each with distinct functions. As different tasks are performed, brain regions regularly synchronize and correlate with each other through intricate networks of connections. The aim of this study is to decode two states of attention by examining the interactions and connections between different brain regions using graph theory. This is demonstrated by EEG recordings from 15 participants who performed visual attention task. Pearson's correlation coefficient and coherence have been used to measure the functional connections between brain regions. In fact, each of these two criteria is regarded as an individual feature, and we perform decoding using each criterion separately. With an optimal selection of 40 connectivity features, the QDA classifier attained accuracies of 79.83% and 83.28% using correlation and coherence features, respectively. The results of attention decoding using the coherence criterion are more promising, indicating the superior effectiveness of coherence-based methods. Therefore, this study employed graph theory to analyse a neural network derived from coherence measurements. The study focused on three graph-theoretical metrics: degree centrality, efficiency, and betweenness centrality. The QDA classifier, using an optimal set of 40 features that includes degree, betweenness, and channel efficiency, achieved an accuracy of 86.46%. In comparison, the QDA classifier with 40 features based solely on degree centrality reached an accuracy of 89.96%. Finally, the results of this research indicate that analysing brain connections and brain network graphs can effectively decode different covert visual attention states.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72681,"journal":{"name":"Computers in human behavior reports","volume":"16 ","pages":"Article 100544"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in human behavior reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451958824001775","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Visual attention is a type of selective attention that plays an important role in prioritizing and processing the information received from the visual scenes around us. The brain is an intricate network composed of numerous regions, each with distinct functions. As different tasks are performed, brain regions regularly synchronize and correlate with each other through intricate networks of connections. The aim of this study is to decode two states of attention by examining the interactions and connections between different brain regions using graph theory. This is demonstrated by EEG recordings from 15 participants who performed visual attention task. Pearson's correlation coefficient and coherence have been used to measure the functional connections between brain regions. In fact, each of these two criteria is regarded as an individual feature, and we perform decoding using each criterion separately. With an optimal selection of 40 connectivity features, the QDA classifier attained accuracies of 79.83% and 83.28% using correlation and coherence features, respectively. The results of attention decoding using the coherence criterion are more promising, indicating the superior effectiveness of coherence-based methods. Therefore, this study employed graph theory to analyse a neural network derived from coherence measurements. The study focused on three graph-theoretical metrics: degree centrality, efficiency, and betweenness centrality. The QDA classifier, using an optimal set of 40 features that includes degree, betweenness, and channel efficiency, achieved an accuracy of 86.46%. In comparison, the QDA classifier with 40 features based solely on degree centrality reached an accuracy of 89.96%. Finally, the results of this research indicate that analysing brain connections and brain network graphs can effectively decode different covert visual attention states.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用脑电信号的图论特征和二次判别分析对运动方向的隐蔽视觉注意进行解码
视觉注意是一种选择性注意,它在我们从周围的视觉场景中接收信息的优先级和处理中起着重要的作用。大脑是一个复杂的网络,由许多区域组成,每个区域都有不同的功能。当执行不同的任务时,大脑区域通过复杂的连接网络有规律地同步并相互关联。本研究的目的是通过使用图论研究大脑不同区域之间的相互作用和联系来解码两种注意力状态。通过15名参与视觉注意任务的参与者的脑电图记录证实了这一点。皮尔逊相关系数和相干性被用来衡量大脑区域之间的功能联系。实际上,这两个标准中的每一个都被视为一个单独的特征,我们分别使用每个标准执行解码。通过对40个连通性特征的优化选择,QDA分类器使用相关和相干特征分别获得了79.83%和83.28%的准确率。使用相干标准进行注意解码的结果更有希望,表明基于相干的方法具有优越的有效性。因此,本研究采用图论来分析由相干测量得出的神经网络。该研究主要关注三个图理论指标:度中心性、效率和中间中心性。QDA分类器使用了包括度、间度和通道效率在内的40个特征的最优集,达到了86.46%的准确率。相比之下,仅基于度中心性的40个特征的QDA分类器准确率达到89.96%。最后,本研究的结果表明,分析脑连接和脑网络图可以有效地解码不同的隐蔽视觉注意状态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Can't look away – The effects of social media cues signaling social evaluation on the attention allocation of socially anxious individuals The relationship between social support and social negativity on social media for virtual socializing and college students’ anxiety levels during the COVID-19 pandemic Reduce your social media use and be mindful for a better mental health: An experimental intervention study from Germany Reading between the lines: LLMs match or exceed human empathic accuracy using text alone Troubled water: Enhancing flood preparedness with eXtended reality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1