Decoding covert visual attention to motion direction using graph theory features of EEG signals and quadratic discriminant analysis

IF 4.9 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Computers in human behavior reports Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100544
Zeinab Rezaei, Mohammad-Mahdi Mohammadi, Mohammad Reza Daliri
{"title":"Decoding covert visual attention to motion direction using graph theory features of EEG signals and quadratic discriminant analysis","authors":"Zeinab Rezaei,&nbsp;Mohammad-Mahdi Mohammadi,&nbsp;Mohammad Reza Daliri","doi":"10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100544","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Visual attention is a type of selective attention that plays an important role in prioritizing and processing the information received from the visual scenes around us. The brain is an intricate network composed of numerous regions, each with distinct functions. As different tasks are performed, brain regions regularly synchronize and correlate with each other through intricate networks of connections. The aim of this study is to decode two states of attention by examining the interactions and connections between different brain regions using graph theory. This is demonstrated by EEG recordings from 15 participants who performed visual attention task. Pearson's correlation coefficient and coherence have been used to measure the functional connections between brain regions. In fact, each of these two criteria is regarded as an individual feature, and we perform decoding using each criterion separately. With an optimal selection of 40 connectivity features, the QDA classifier attained accuracies of 79.83% and 83.28% using correlation and coherence features, respectively. The results of attention decoding using the coherence criterion are more promising, indicating the superior effectiveness of coherence-based methods. Therefore, this study employed graph theory to analyse a neural network derived from coherence measurements. The study focused on three graph-theoretical metrics: degree centrality, efficiency, and betweenness centrality. The QDA classifier, using an optimal set of 40 features that includes degree, betweenness, and channel efficiency, achieved an accuracy of 86.46%. In comparison, the QDA classifier with 40 features based solely on degree centrality reached an accuracy of 89.96%. Finally, the results of this research indicate that analysing brain connections and brain network graphs can effectively decode different covert visual attention states.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72681,"journal":{"name":"Computers in human behavior reports","volume":"16 ","pages":"Article 100544"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in human behavior reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451958824001775","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Visual attention is a type of selective attention that plays an important role in prioritizing and processing the information received from the visual scenes around us. The brain is an intricate network composed of numerous regions, each with distinct functions. As different tasks are performed, brain regions regularly synchronize and correlate with each other through intricate networks of connections. The aim of this study is to decode two states of attention by examining the interactions and connections between different brain regions using graph theory. This is demonstrated by EEG recordings from 15 participants who performed visual attention task. Pearson's correlation coefficient and coherence have been used to measure the functional connections between brain regions. In fact, each of these two criteria is regarded as an individual feature, and we perform decoding using each criterion separately. With an optimal selection of 40 connectivity features, the QDA classifier attained accuracies of 79.83% and 83.28% using correlation and coherence features, respectively. The results of attention decoding using the coherence criterion are more promising, indicating the superior effectiveness of coherence-based methods. Therefore, this study employed graph theory to analyse a neural network derived from coherence measurements. The study focused on three graph-theoretical metrics: degree centrality, efficiency, and betweenness centrality. The QDA classifier, using an optimal set of 40 features that includes degree, betweenness, and channel efficiency, achieved an accuracy of 86.46%. In comparison, the QDA classifier with 40 features based solely on degree centrality reached an accuracy of 89.96%. Finally, the results of this research indicate that analysing brain connections and brain network graphs can effectively decode different covert visual attention states.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Utilizing VR technology to explore the moral courage process and bystander behaviors: An experimental trial Toward the Language MOOC (LMOOC’s) low dropout rate: The control-value theory of persistency in LMOOC (CVTPLMOOC) Inclusive digital platforms: Designing for and with users with mild intellectual disabilities or low literacy skills Master your practice! A quantitative analysis of Device and system handling training to enable competent interactions with intelligent voice assistants Large Language Models meet moral values: A comprehensive assessment of moral abilities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1