Hydrogen flammability and explosion concentration limits for a wide temperature range

IF 3.6 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL Journal of Loss Prevention in The Process Industries Pub Date : 2025-01-13 DOI:10.1016/j.jlp.2025.105554
V.Yu. Plaksin, I.A. Kirillov
{"title":"Hydrogen flammability and explosion concentration limits for a wide temperature range","authors":"V.Yu. Plaksin,&nbsp;I.A. Kirillov","doi":"10.1016/j.jlp.2025.105554","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This article presents a theoretical approach for quantifying the flammability and explosion limits of hydrogen-air mixtures over a wide range of temperatures (from 90 K to 850 K) at normal pressure. In a first part of paper, a critical review of the published results is made. We demonstrate that existing empirical datasets and phenomenology-based analytical and computational models critically depend upon features of experimental facility, measurement procedure and criterion for combustion limits. This dependence results into variations of values of concentration limits, obtained in different experimental setups, making it difficult to reconcile data and limiting predictive capabilities and conservatism of the empirical datasets. Further, we describe a non-empirical framework for studying the fundamental concentration limits for the basic combustion models in hydrogen-air mixtures – adiabatic spherical flame balls, plane deflagration flames, plane detonation waves. This framework does not rely on experimental combustion data, but rather uses mathematical models based on “the first physical and chemical principles”. The proposed framework introduces three innovations: 1) the first non-empiric explanation of the ternary \"hydrogen-air-water steam\" flammability diagram's structure for slow ascending and descending flames, 2) the first theoretical explanation of the quasi-invariance of the adiabatic flame temperature for the near-limits flames, 3) the new kinetic criterion for flame acceleration, which provides conservative predictions for both the lower and the upper concentration limits of the flame acceleration. We conclude this work by discussion of additional features for empowering of the non-empirical models and future experiments that could further improve overall knowledge of nature and quantitative accuracy of the concentration limits.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16291,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Loss Prevention in The Process Industries","volume":"94 ","pages":"Article 105554"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Loss Prevention in The Process Industries","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950423025000129","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article presents a theoretical approach for quantifying the flammability and explosion limits of hydrogen-air mixtures over a wide range of temperatures (from 90 K to 850 K) at normal pressure. In a first part of paper, a critical review of the published results is made. We demonstrate that existing empirical datasets and phenomenology-based analytical and computational models critically depend upon features of experimental facility, measurement procedure and criterion for combustion limits. This dependence results into variations of values of concentration limits, obtained in different experimental setups, making it difficult to reconcile data and limiting predictive capabilities and conservatism of the empirical datasets. Further, we describe a non-empirical framework for studying the fundamental concentration limits for the basic combustion models in hydrogen-air mixtures – adiabatic spherical flame balls, plane deflagration flames, plane detonation waves. This framework does not rely on experimental combustion data, but rather uses mathematical models based on “the first physical and chemical principles”. The proposed framework introduces three innovations: 1) the first non-empiric explanation of the ternary "hydrogen-air-water steam" flammability diagram's structure for slow ascending and descending flames, 2) the first theoretical explanation of the quasi-invariance of the adiabatic flame temperature for the near-limits flames, 3) the new kinetic criterion for flame acceleration, which provides conservative predictions for both the lower and the upper concentration limits of the flame acceleration. We conclude this work by discussion of additional features for empowering of the non-empirical models and future experiments that could further improve overall knowledge of nature and quantitative accuracy of the concentration limits.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
14.30%
发文量
226
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The broad scope of the journal is process safety. Process safety is defined as the prevention and mitigation of process-related injuries and damage arising from process incidents involving fire, explosion and toxic release. Such undesired events occur in the process industries during the use, storage, manufacture, handling, and transportation of highly hazardous chemicals.
期刊最新文献
Systems Thinking for explosion safety management Research on leakage control of river oil and gas pipelines based on accident situation evolution model Investigation on the deflagration inhibition effects of potassium salt-modified dry water on CH4/air mixture Large-scale experimental study of open, impinging and confined hydrogen jet fires Natech accidents and their impact on environment caused by dangerous substance release from the SEVESO establishment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1