Comparison of the effect of role-playing and team-based learning on interpersonal communication skills of emergency medical personnels

Q2 Social Sciences Educacion Medica Pub Date : 2025-01-07 DOI:10.1016/j.edumed.2024.101012
Mohsen Sayahi , Reza Nabi Amjad , Mahmoud Kohan
{"title":"Comparison of the effect of role-playing and team-based learning on interpersonal communication skills of emergency medical personnels","authors":"Mohsen Sayahi ,&nbsp;Reza Nabi Amjad ,&nbsp;Mahmoud Kohan","doi":"10.1016/j.edumed.2024.101012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Effective communication and interpersonal skills among medical emergency staff enhance service quality, reduce errors, boost patient satisfaction, and decrease stress. Role-playing and team-based learning are key methods to improve these skills, but determining the most effective approach is challenging. This study aimed to compare the impact of these 2 methods on the interpersonal communication skills of medical emergency staff at Abadan University of Medical Sciences in 2024.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>This study used a semi-experimental pre-test–post-test design, targeting medical emergency staff at Abadan University of Medical Sciences in 2024. Sixty-eight eligible staff members were chosen through convenience sampling and assigned to 2 groups: role-playing and team-based learning. Data collection involved a demographic form and Wheeless et al.'s interpersonal communication skills questionnaire. Analysis was performed using SPSS version 22, with a significance level established at <em>P</em> &lt; .05.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The 2 groups had similar demographic characteristics (<em>P</em> &gt; .05). Before the intervention, the mean score for interpersonal communication skills was 15.46 ± 93.97 in the team-based learning group and 14.30 ± 94.76 in the role-playing group, with no significant difference (<em>P</em> = .82). Post-intervention scores improved to 119.38 ± 11.96 for team-based learning and 131.76 ± 10.51 for role-playing, showing significant improvement, especially in the role-playing group (<em>P</em> = .001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The study shows role-playing and team-based learning enhance medical emergency staff's communication skills, with role-playing being more effective. Both methods are recommended, emphasizing role-playing for skill enhancement.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":35317,"journal":{"name":"Educacion Medica","volume":"26 3","pages":"Article 101012"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educacion Medica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S157518132400127X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Effective communication and interpersonal skills among medical emergency staff enhance service quality, reduce errors, boost patient satisfaction, and decrease stress. Role-playing and team-based learning are key methods to improve these skills, but determining the most effective approach is challenging. This study aimed to compare the impact of these 2 methods on the interpersonal communication skills of medical emergency staff at Abadan University of Medical Sciences in 2024.

Material and methods

This study used a semi-experimental pre-test–post-test design, targeting medical emergency staff at Abadan University of Medical Sciences in 2024. Sixty-eight eligible staff members were chosen through convenience sampling and assigned to 2 groups: role-playing and team-based learning. Data collection involved a demographic form and Wheeless et al.'s interpersonal communication skills questionnaire. Analysis was performed using SPSS version 22, with a significance level established at P < .05.

Results

The 2 groups had similar demographic characteristics (P > .05). Before the intervention, the mean score for interpersonal communication skills was 15.46 ± 93.97 in the team-based learning group and 14.30 ± 94.76 in the role-playing group, with no significant difference (P = .82). Post-intervention scores improved to 119.38 ± 11.96 for team-based learning and 131.76 ± 10.51 for role-playing, showing significant improvement, especially in the role-playing group (P = .001).

Conclusion

The study shows role-playing and team-based learning enhance medical emergency staff's communication skills, with role-playing being more effective. Both methods are recommended, emphasizing role-playing for skill enhancement.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Educacion Medica
Educacion Medica Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Educación Médica, revista trimestral que se viene publicando desde 1998 es editada desde enero de 2003 por la Fundación Educación Médica. Pretende contribuir a la difusión de los estudios y trabajos que en este campo se están llevando a cabo en todo el mundo, pero de una manera especial en nuestro entorno. Los artículos de Educación Médica tratarán tanto sobre aspectos prácticos de la docencia en su día a día como sobre cuestiones más teóricas de la educación médica. Así mismo, la revista intentará proporcionar análisis y opiniones de expertos de reconocido prestigio internacional.
期刊最新文献
The Simcup Morocco: Exploration of the concept, innovative pedagogical relevance, and perspectives Conocimientos, práctica y actitudes hacia la salud oral entre matronas de España Validación y adaptación cultural al español de la Rúbrica de retroalimentación del desempeño quirúrgico (SPR) Actitud del profesional de la salud ante la muerte de un paciente por error médico Percepciones y satisfacción sobre una prueba de progreso en estudiantes de medicina
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1