Linking components of social media usage to psychological distress: Integrating the situational theory of problem-solving and social capital theory

IF 11 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services Pub Date : 2024-12-16 DOI:10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.104187
Wei Tian , Feroz De Costa , Amir Rizaan Abdul Rahiman , Taewoo Roh
{"title":"Linking components of social media usage to psychological distress: Integrating the situational theory of problem-solving and social capital theory","authors":"Wei Tian ,&nbsp;Feroz De Costa ,&nbsp;Amir Rizaan Abdul Rahiman ,&nbsp;Taewoo Roh","doi":"10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.104187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite extensive research on psychological distress, studies that examine how social media usage impacts psychological distress are notably missing. This study employs the lenses of the situational theory of problem-solving and social capital theory to examine the relationship between social media usage and psychological distress. Our hypotheses propose that social media activities play a mediating role in the relationship between social media usage and psychological distress, while media skepticism and interpersonal injustice act as moderating factors. A structured questionnaire was developed and distributed to social media users in five major Chinese cities: Shenzhen, Guangzhou, Dongguan, Zhuhai, and Shantou. Non-probability convenience sampling and a two-wave research design were employed to collect data from 866 social media users. The results indicated a positive association between social media usage and psychological distress. Notably, social media activities were a positively significant mediator of this relationship. However, the moderating effect of media skepticism was non-significant, while interpersonal injustice reduces the impact of social media usage on psychological distress. The relationship between constraint recognition and psychological distress was not significant. These findings lead to practical insights for efficiently controlling social media participation and online behaviors, while also considering how interpersonal unfairness and other factors influence users' emotional distress levels.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48399,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services","volume":"84 ","pages":"Article 104187"},"PeriodicalIF":11.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969698924004831","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite extensive research on psychological distress, studies that examine how social media usage impacts psychological distress are notably missing. This study employs the lenses of the situational theory of problem-solving and social capital theory to examine the relationship between social media usage and psychological distress. Our hypotheses propose that social media activities play a mediating role in the relationship between social media usage and psychological distress, while media skepticism and interpersonal injustice act as moderating factors. A structured questionnaire was developed and distributed to social media users in five major Chinese cities: Shenzhen, Guangzhou, Dongguan, Zhuhai, and Shantou. Non-probability convenience sampling and a two-wave research design were employed to collect data from 866 social media users. The results indicated a positive association between social media usage and psychological distress. Notably, social media activities were a positively significant mediator of this relationship. However, the moderating effect of media skepticism was non-significant, while interpersonal injustice reduces the impact of social media usage on psychological distress. The relationship between constraint recognition and psychological distress was not significant. These findings lead to practical insights for efficiently controlling social media participation and online behaviors, while also considering how interpersonal unfairness and other factors influence users' emotional distress levels.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
14.40%
发文量
340
审稿时长
20 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services is a prominent publication that serves as a platform for international and interdisciplinary research and discussions in the constantly evolving fields of retailing and services studies. With a specific emphasis on consumer behavior and policy and managerial decisions, the journal aims to foster contributions from academics encompassing diverse disciplines. The primary areas covered by the journal are: Retailing and the sale of goods The provision of consumer services, including transportation, tourism, and leisure.
期刊最新文献
Less stress, fewer delays: The role of sophisticated AI in mitigating decision fatigue and purchase postponement in luxury retail Research on the impact of matched effects between green advertising appeals and product type on consumer purchase intention I am not like them: A terror management theory perspective on the consumer separation tendency of pet profile images E-commerce enterprise flexibility leading to better customer perception Optimizing cooperation mechanisms for augmented reality (AR) services: Balancing product returns, pricing, and customer satisfaction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1