Optimizing cooperation mechanisms for augmented reality (AR) services: Balancing product returns, pricing, and customer satisfaction

IF 11 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services Pub Date : 2025-02-25 DOI:10.1016/j.jretconser.2025.104263
Zhitang Li , Peng He , Henry Xu
{"title":"Optimizing cooperation mechanisms for augmented reality (AR) services: Balancing product returns, pricing, and customer satisfaction","authors":"Zhitang Li ,&nbsp;Peng He ,&nbsp;Henry Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.jretconser.2025.104263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Augmented Reality (AR) enhances user interaction with digital overlays, improving product marketing. This study investigates the interplay between AR services provided by influencers and product returns, focusing on two cooperation mechanisms: the agency mechanism (collaboration with suppliers) and the self-built store mechanism (independent operations with suppliers). Our research delves into the challenge of product returns and explores cooperation mechanisms between product suppliers and influencers utilizing AR services. The research results first show that higher customer satisfaction and providing AR services tend to increase product price and lead to higher return rates, while lower customer satisfaction and the absence of AR services result in lower product price but higher customer retention. Secondly, under the agency mechanism, when return loss costs are higher and customer satisfaction is lower, influencers provide more AR services. In the customer keep phenomenon, influencers should consider the wholesale price level, in addition to the unit management cost when deciding on high-quality AR services. Thirdly, under the agency mechanism, influencers choose to provide AR services only when customer satisfaction is very low but refrain in the self-built store mechanism. In addition, when customer satisfaction is higher, influencers can consider providing AR services and accepting returns. Furthermore, from the perspective of influencers, the agency mechanism is more advantageous when AR services are provided, while the self-built store mechanism is optimal without AR services under low satisfaction. High satisfaction consistently favors the agency mechanism.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48399,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services","volume":"85 ","pages":"Article 104263"},"PeriodicalIF":11.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969698925000426","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Augmented Reality (AR) enhances user interaction with digital overlays, improving product marketing. This study investigates the interplay between AR services provided by influencers and product returns, focusing on two cooperation mechanisms: the agency mechanism (collaboration with suppliers) and the self-built store mechanism (independent operations with suppliers). Our research delves into the challenge of product returns and explores cooperation mechanisms between product suppliers and influencers utilizing AR services. The research results first show that higher customer satisfaction and providing AR services tend to increase product price and lead to higher return rates, while lower customer satisfaction and the absence of AR services result in lower product price but higher customer retention. Secondly, under the agency mechanism, when return loss costs are higher and customer satisfaction is lower, influencers provide more AR services. In the customer keep phenomenon, influencers should consider the wholesale price level, in addition to the unit management cost when deciding on high-quality AR services. Thirdly, under the agency mechanism, influencers choose to provide AR services only when customer satisfaction is very low but refrain in the self-built store mechanism. In addition, when customer satisfaction is higher, influencers can consider providing AR services and accepting returns. Furthermore, from the perspective of influencers, the agency mechanism is more advantageous when AR services are provided, while the self-built store mechanism is optimal without AR services under low satisfaction. High satisfaction consistently favors the agency mechanism.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
14.40%
发文量
340
审稿时长
20 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services is a prominent publication that serves as a platform for international and interdisciplinary research and discussions in the constantly evolving fields of retailing and services studies. With a specific emphasis on consumer behavior and policy and managerial decisions, the journal aims to foster contributions from academics encompassing diverse disciplines. The primary areas covered by the journal are: Retailing and the sale of goods The provision of consumer services, including transportation, tourism, and leisure.
期刊最新文献
Less stress, fewer delays: The role of sophisticated AI in mitigating decision fatigue and purchase postponement in luxury retail Research on the impact of matched effects between green advertising appeals and product type on consumer purchase intention I am not like them: A terror management theory perspective on the consumer separation tendency of pet profile images E-commerce enterprise flexibility leading to better customer perception Optimizing cooperation mechanisms for augmented reality (AR) services: Balancing product returns, pricing, and customer satisfaction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1