Talk, but don’t talk too much: How corporate sustainability communication evokes stepwise organizational change

IF 10.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Business Research Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115188
Manuel Reppmann , Frederik Maibaum , Laura Marie Edinger-Schons , Johann Nils Foege
{"title":"Talk, but don’t talk too much: How corporate sustainability communication evokes stepwise organizational change","authors":"Manuel Reppmann ,&nbsp;Frederik Maibaum ,&nbsp;Laura Marie Edinger-Schons ,&nbsp;Johann Nils Foege","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Many companies communicate about their corporate sustainability (CS) activities to demonstrate conformity with stakeholder expectations. This communication is known as CS talk. While the common notion views CS talk as a retrospective description of CS activities, some studies have adopted a formative view of CS talk, acknowledging its potential to trigger CS-related organizational change, i.e., CS walk. Building on this view, we develop a novel conceptual framework describing the link between CS talk and walk. We propose that while CS talk stimulates future CS walk, too much talk can inhibit companies from aligning their words with actions, leading to an inverted U-shaped relationship between CS talk and walk. Moreover, we suggest that the extent to which external stakeholders monitor a company amplifies the inverted U-shape effect. Beyond that, we assert that the performative impact of CS talk on walk gradually unfolds within companies by initially triggering symbolic CS walk, which subsequently translates into substantive CS walk. To test our theorizing, we created a text-based measure for CS talk and matched it with secondary data, assembling a sample of 820 US companies listed in the S&amp;P 1,500 over 15 years. The results of our analysis support our theorizing and contribute to research at the intersection of CS-related communication and organizational change, providing insights into the shape of the performative effect of CS talk and the organizational change process it initiates.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Research","volume":"189 ","pages":"Article 115188"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325000116","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many companies communicate about their corporate sustainability (CS) activities to demonstrate conformity with stakeholder expectations. This communication is known as CS talk. While the common notion views CS talk as a retrospective description of CS activities, some studies have adopted a formative view of CS talk, acknowledging its potential to trigger CS-related organizational change, i.e., CS walk. Building on this view, we develop a novel conceptual framework describing the link between CS talk and walk. We propose that while CS talk stimulates future CS walk, too much talk can inhibit companies from aligning their words with actions, leading to an inverted U-shaped relationship between CS talk and walk. Moreover, we suggest that the extent to which external stakeholders monitor a company amplifies the inverted U-shape effect. Beyond that, we assert that the performative impact of CS talk on walk gradually unfolds within companies by initially triggering symbolic CS walk, which subsequently translates into substantive CS walk. To test our theorizing, we created a text-based measure for CS talk and matched it with secondary data, assembling a sample of 820 US companies listed in the S&P 1,500 over 15 years. The results of our analysis support our theorizing and contribute to research at the intersection of CS-related communication and organizational change, providing insights into the shape of the performative effect of CS talk and the organizational change process it initiates.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.30
自引率
10.60%
发文量
956
期刊介绍: The Journal of Business Research aims to publish research that is rigorous, relevant, and potentially impactful. It examines a wide variety of business decision contexts, processes, and activities, developing insights that are meaningful for theory, practice, and/or society at large. The research is intended to generate meaningful debates in academia and practice, that are thought provoking and have the potential to make a difference to conceptual thinking and/or practice. The Journal is published for a broad range of stakeholders, including scholars, researchers, executives, and policy makers. It aids the application of its research to practical situations and theoretical findings to the reality of the business world as well as to society. The Journal is abstracted and indexed in several databases, including Social Sciences Citation Index, ANBAR, Current Contents, Management Contents, Management Literature in Brief, PsycINFO, Information Service, RePEc, Academic Journal Guide, ABI/Inform, INSPEC, etc.
期刊最新文献
Sustainable development at a temporal crossroads: Learning from the past while focusing on the future The effects of dual-oriented branding strategies on brand equity through innovation investment Marketing strategy implementation: Why is it so hard? Online chat encounters: Satisfying customers through dialogical interaction Overcoming reactance to climate change: The business-ecology nexus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1