Talk, but don’t talk too much: How corporate sustainability communication evokes stepwise organizational change

IF 9.8 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Business Research Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-16 DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115188
Manuel Reppmann , Frederik Maibaum , Laura Marie Edinger-Schons , Johann Nils Foege
{"title":"Talk, but don’t talk too much: How corporate sustainability communication evokes stepwise organizational change","authors":"Manuel Reppmann ,&nbsp;Frederik Maibaum ,&nbsp;Laura Marie Edinger-Schons ,&nbsp;Johann Nils Foege","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Many companies communicate about their corporate sustainability (CS) activities to demonstrate conformity with stakeholder expectations. This communication is known as CS talk. While the common notion views CS talk as a retrospective description of CS activities, some studies have adopted a formative view of CS talk, acknowledging its potential to trigger CS-related organizational change, i.e., CS walk. Building on this view, we develop a novel conceptual framework describing the link between CS talk and walk. We propose that while CS talk stimulates future CS walk, too much talk can inhibit companies from aligning their words with actions, leading to an inverted U-shaped relationship between CS talk and walk. Moreover, we suggest that the extent to which external stakeholders monitor a company amplifies the inverted U-shape effect. Beyond that, we assert that the performative impact of CS talk on walk gradually unfolds within companies by initially triggering symbolic CS walk, which subsequently translates into substantive CS walk. To test our theorizing, we created a text-based measure for CS talk and matched it with secondary data, assembling a sample of 820 US companies listed in the S&amp;P 1,500 over 15 years. The results of our analysis support our theorizing and contribute to research at the intersection of CS-related communication and organizational change, providing insights into the shape of the performative effect of CS talk and the organizational change process it initiates.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Research","volume":"189 ","pages":"Article 115188"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325000116","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many companies communicate about their corporate sustainability (CS) activities to demonstrate conformity with stakeholder expectations. This communication is known as CS talk. While the common notion views CS talk as a retrospective description of CS activities, some studies have adopted a formative view of CS talk, acknowledging its potential to trigger CS-related organizational change, i.e., CS walk. Building on this view, we develop a novel conceptual framework describing the link between CS talk and walk. We propose that while CS talk stimulates future CS walk, too much talk can inhibit companies from aligning their words with actions, leading to an inverted U-shaped relationship between CS talk and walk. Moreover, we suggest that the extent to which external stakeholders monitor a company amplifies the inverted U-shape effect. Beyond that, we assert that the performative impact of CS talk on walk gradually unfolds within companies by initially triggering symbolic CS walk, which subsequently translates into substantive CS walk. To test our theorizing, we created a text-based measure for CS talk and matched it with secondary data, assembling a sample of 820 US companies listed in the S&P 1,500 over 15 years. The results of our analysis support our theorizing and contribute to research at the intersection of CS-related communication and organizational change, providing insights into the shape of the performative effect of CS talk and the organizational change process it initiates.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
谈论,但不要说太多:企业可持续发展沟通如何引发逐步的组织变革
许多公司就其企业可持续发展(CS)活动进行沟通,以证明符合利益相关者的期望。这种交流被称为CS谈话。虽然普遍的观点认为CS谈话是对CS活动的回顾性描述,但一些研究采用了CS谈话的形成性观点,承认它有可能引发与CS相关的组织变革,即CS行走。基于这一观点,我们开发了一个新的概念框架来描述CS说话和走路之间的联系。我们提出,虽然CS谈话会刺激未来的CS行动,但过多的谈话会抑制公司的言行一致,导致CS谈话和行动之间的倒u型关系。此外,我们认为外部利益相关者监督公司的程度放大了倒u型效应。除此之外,我们断言,CS演讲对步行的绩效影响通过最初触发象征性的CS步行,随后转化为实质性的CS步行,逐渐在公司内部展开。为了验证我们的理论,我们创建了一种基于文本的CS谈话测量方法,并将其与二手数据相匹配,收集了820家在标准普尔1500指数上市15年的美国公司的样本。我们的分析结果支持了我们的理论,并有助于研究CS相关沟通与组织变革的交叉点,为CS谈话的执行效应的形成及其引发的组织变革过程提供见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.30
自引率
10.60%
发文量
956
期刊介绍: The Journal of Business Research aims to publish research that is rigorous, relevant, and potentially impactful. It examines a wide variety of business decision contexts, processes, and activities, developing insights that are meaningful for theory, practice, and/or society at large. The research is intended to generate meaningful debates in academia and practice, that are thought provoking and have the potential to make a difference to conceptual thinking and/or practice. The Journal is published for a broad range of stakeholders, including scholars, researchers, executives, and policy makers. It aids the application of its research to practical situations and theoretical findings to the reality of the business world as well as to society. The Journal is abstracted and indexed in several databases, including Social Sciences Citation Index, ANBAR, Current Contents, Management Contents, Management Literature in Brief, PsycINFO, Information Service, RePEc, Academic Journal Guide, ABI/Inform, INSPEC, etc.
期刊最新文献
Building social legitimacy through NGOs partnerships: evidence from micro-multinationals I hereby consent: Leveraging consent management and chatbot anthropomorphism to influence information disclosure and usage intentions Do the environmental underperformance intensity and duration affect corporate green innovation? evidence from the Chinese manufacturing industry The influence of national contexts on hybrid tensions, and how to manage them through business model innovation Demands, resources, and employee wellbeing during the Covid-19 pandemic: “traditional” values as psychological buffer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1