Manuel Reppmann , Frederik Maibaum , Laura Marie Edinger-Schons , Johann Nils Foege
{"title":"Talk, but don’t talk too much: How corporate sustainability communication evokes stepwise organizational change","authors":"Manuel Reppmann , Frederik Maibaum , Laura Marie Edinger-Schons , Johann Nils Foege","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Many companies communicate about their corporate sustainability (CS) activities to demonstrate conformity with stakeholder expectations. This communication is known as CS talk. While the common notion views CS talk as a retrospective description of CS activities, some studies have adopted a formative view of CS talk, acknowledging its potential to trigger CS-related organizational change, i.e., CS walk. Building on this view, we develop a novel conceptual framework describing the link between CS talk and walk. We propose that while CS talk stimulates future CS walk, too much talk can inhibit companies from aligning their words with actions, leading to an inverted U-shaped relationship between CS talk and walk. Moreover, we suggest that the extent to which external stakeholders monitor a company amplifies the inverted U-shape effect. Beyond that, we assert that the performative impact of CS talk on walk gradually unfolds within companies by initially triggering symbolic CS walk, which subsequently translates into substantive CS walk. To test our theorizing, we created a text-based measure for CS talk and matched it with secondary data, assembling a sample of 820 US companies listed in the S&P 1,500 over 15 years. The results of our analysis support our theorizing and contribute to research at the intersection of CS-related communication and organizational change, providing insights into the shape of the performative effect of CS talk and the organizational change process it initiates.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Research","volume":"189 ","pages":"Article 115188"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325000116","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Many companies communicate about their corporate sustainability (CS) activities to demonstrate conformity with stakeholder expectations. This communication is known as CS talk. While the common notion views CS talk as a retrospective description of CS activities, some studies have adopted a formative view of CS talk, acknowledging its potential to trigger CS-related organizational change, i.e., CS walk. Building on this view, we develop a novel conceptual framework describing the link between CS talk and walk. We propose that while CS talk stimulates future CS walk, too much talk can inhibit companies from aligning their words with actions, leading to an inverted U-shaped relationship between CS talk and walk. Moreover, we suggest that the extent to which external stakeholders monitor a company amplifies the inverted U-shape effect. Beyond that, we assert that the performative impact of CS talk on walk gradually unfolds within companies by initially triggering symbolic CS walk, which subsequently translates into substantive CS walk. To test our theorizing, we created a text-based measure for CS talk and matched it with secondary data, assembling a sample of 820 US companies listed in the S&P 1,500 over 15 years. The results of our analysis support our theorizing and contribute to research at the intersection of CS-related communication and organizational change, providing insights into the shape of the performative effect of CS talk and the organizational change process it initiates.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Business Research aims to publish research that is rigorous, relevant, and potentially impactful. It examines a wide variety of business decision contexts, processes, and activities, developing insights that are meaningful for theory, practice, and/or society at large. The research is intended to generate meaningful debates in academia and practice, that are thought provoking and have the potential to make a difference to conceptual thinking and/or practice. The Journal is published for a broad range of stakeholders, including scholars, researchers, executives, and policy makers. It aids the application of its research to practical situations and theoretical findings to the reality of the business world as well as to society. The Journal is abstracted and indexed in several databases, including Social Sciences Citation Index, ANBAR, Current Contents, Management Contents, Management Literature in Brief, PsycINFO, Information Service, RePEc, Academic Journal Guide, ABI/Inform, INSPEC, etc.