Improved machine learning framework for prediction of phases and crystal structures of high entropy alloys

Debsundar Dey , Suchandan Das , Anik Pal , Santanu Dey , Chandan Kumar Raul , Pritam Mandal , Arghya Chatterjee , Soumya Chatterjee , Manojit Ghosh
{"title":"Improved machine learning framework for prediction of phases and crystal structures of high entropy alloys","authors":"Debsundar Dey ,&nbsp;Suchandan Das ,&nbsp;Anik Pal ,&nbsp;Santanu Dey ,&nbsp;Chandan Kumar Raul ,&nbsp;Pritam Mandal ,&nbsp;Arghya Chatterjee ,&nbsp;Soumya Chatterjee ,&nbsp;Manojit Ghosh","doi":"10.1016/j.jalmes.2024.100144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>High-entropy alloys (HEAs) are gaining popularity because of their remarkable properties controlled by phases and crystal structures. In addition to that, in the field of material informatics, machine learning (ML) techniques have gained considerable attention in predicting phases and crystal structures of HEAs. In this study, a novel ML-based methodology has been proposed to predict different phase stages and crystal structures. To this end, 1345 data samples were used to train the ML model to predict the phases of HEAs. Within the dataset, 705 data were utilized to predict the crystal structures with the help of thermodynamics and electronic configuration as input features. The important features were selected using the Pearson correlation coefficient matrix, followed by using of five distinct boosting algorithms to predict phases and crystal structures. Among all these algorithms, XGBoost recorded the highest detection accuracy of 94.05 % for phases and LightGBM yielded the highest detection accuracy of 90.07 % for crystal structure. Various hyperparameter tuning was conducted to find the optimum performance of the boosting classifiers. A comprehensive comparison was performed between the ML models and some from published papers in reputed journals. From the comparison, it was evident that the proposed methodology showed its superiority in terms of phase and crystal structure detection of HEAs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100753,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Alloys and Metallurgical Systems","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100144"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Alloys and Metallurgical Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949917824000932","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

High-entropy alloys (HEAs) are gaining popularity because of their remarkable properties controlled by phases and crystal structures. In addition to that, in the field of material informatics, machine learning (ML) techniques have gained considerable attention in predicting phases and crystal structures of HEAs. In this study, a novel ML-based methodology has been proposed to predict different phase stages and crystal structures. To this end, 1345 data samples were used to train the ML model to predict the phases of HEAs. Within the dataset, 705 data were utilized to predict the crystal structures with the help of thermodynamics and electronic configuration as input features. The important features were selected using the Pearson correlation coefficient matrix, followed by using of five distinct boosting algorithms to predict phases and crystal structures. Among all these algorithms, XGBoost recorded the highest detection accuracy of 94.05 % for phases and LightGBM yielded the highest detection accuracy of 90.07 % for crystal structure. Various hyperparameter tuning was conducted to find the optimum performance of the boosting classifiers. A comprehensive comparison was performed between the ML models and some from published papers in reputed journals. From the comparison, it was evident that the proposed methodology showed its superiority in terms of phase and crystal structure detection of HEAs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改进的机器学习框架预测高熵合金的相和晶体结构
高熵合金(HEAs)由于具有由相和晶体结构控制的优异性能而越来越受到人们的欢迎。除此之外,在材料信息学领域,机器学习(ML)技术在预测HEAs的相和晶体结构方面得到了相当大的关注。在这项研究中,提出了一种新的基于ml的方法来预测不同的相阶段和晶体结构。为此,使用1345个数据样本来训练ML模型来预测HEAs的阶段。在数据集中,利用705个数据以热力学和电子组态作为输入特征来预测晶体结构。使用Pearson相关系数矩阵选择重要特征,然后使用五种不同的增强算法来预测相和晶体结构。其中,XGBoost对相位的检测精度最高,为94.05 %;LightGBM对晶体结构的检测精度最高,为90.07 %。通过各种超参数调优来寻找提升分类器的最佳性能。将ML模型与一些知名期刊上发表的论文进行了全面的比较。对比表明,本文提出的方法在检测HEAs的物相和晶体结构方面具有优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Laser shock processing: An effective post-treatment process to enhance mechanical performances of laser additive manufactured parts The effect of heat treatment temperature on the wear resistance of 42CrMo steel hardfacing with Fe–Cr–C alloy Effect of Sn addition on the microstructure, mechanical properties, and corrosion behaviour of AZ31 magnesium alloy Influence of Er addition and thermomechanical processing on the in vitro corrosion and cytocompatibility of Mg–Zn–Y alloys High-temperature cyclic oxidation and microstructural behavior of CoMoCrSi-based composite coatings with Al2O3 and YSZ on T91 steel
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1