The safety and effectiveness of tDCS for epileptic patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE Complementary therapies in medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-03 DOI:10.1016/j.ctim.2025.103142
Xiao-Tong Ding , Ming-Yu Hu , Chi Wang , Wei-Ye Kang , Jin-Zhao Huang , Rui-Yu Wang , Qiu-Song Shen , Hou-Ming Kan
{"title":"The safety and effectiveness of tDCS for epileptic patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Xiao-Tong Ding ,&nbsp;Ming-Yu Hu ,&nbsp;Chi Wang ,&nbsp;Wei-Ye Kang ,&nbsp;Jin-Zhao Huang ,&nbsp;Rui-Yu Wang ,&nbsp;Qiu-Song Shen ,&nbsp;Hou-Ming Kan","doi":"10.1016/j.ctim.2025.103142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><div>Although transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been used in the treatment of epilepsy for many years, further research is needed on the efficacy and safety of tDCS treatment. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to explore the effectiveness of tDCS on seizure frequency (SF), epileptiform discharges, depression, anxiety, and cognitive function in epilepsy.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>We searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases from inception to 9 September 2024. The primary outcomes included SF. The secondary outcomes included epileptiform discharges, depression, anxiety, cognitive function, and adverse events. The meta-analysis was conducted using Review Manager 5.4 software.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>12 trials were included, 356 participants (219 in the tDCS group and 137 in the sham group). Among the included studies, three were of high risk, two were of some concern, and seven were of low risk. For the primary outcome metrics, tDCS can reduce the frequency of epileptic seizures (SMD = − 0.63, 95 % CI = [-0.90, − 0.36], <em>P</em> <em>&lt;</em> 0.00001). For secondary outcome measures, there are no statistical differences between the tDCS group and the sham group in epileptiform discharges (SMD = − 0.27, 95 % CI = [-0.71, 0.16], <em>P</em> = 0.22) and adverse events (MD = 1.30, 95 % CI = [0.49, 3.45], <em>P</em> = 0.60). The outcomes of tDCS treatment for depression and anxiety were inconsistent. tDCS did not enhance or impair cognitive function.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>tDCS can reduce SF but has no effect on epileptiform discharges in patients with epilepsy. The current evidence is limited to support tDCS treatment for depression, anxiety, and cognitive function in epilepsy patients. Future studies should be standardized and personalized, ensure higher methodological rigor, and probe long-term effects to prove the findings further.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10545,"journal":{"name":"Complementary therapies in medicine","volume":"89 ","pages":"Article 103142"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Complementary therapies in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965229925000172","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose

Although transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been used in the treatment of epilepsy for many years, further research is needed on the efficacy and safety of tDCS treatment. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to explore the effectiveness of tDCS on seizure frequency (SF), epileptiform discharges, depression, anxiety, and cognitive function in epilepsy.

Materials and methods

We searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases from inception to 9 September 2024. The primary outcomes included SF. The secondary outcomes included epileptiform discharges, depression, anxiety, cognitive function, and adverse events. The meta-analysis was conducted using Review Manager 5.4 software.

Results

12 trials were included, 356 participants (219 in the tDCS group and 137 in the sham group). Among the included studies, three were of high risk, two were of some concern, and seven were of low risk. For the primary outcome metrics, tDCS can reduce the frequency of epileptic seizures (SMD = − 0.63, 95 % CI = [-0.90, − 0.36], P< 0.00001). For secondary outcome measures, there are no statistical differences between the tDCS group and the sham group in epileptiform discharges (SMD = − 0.27, 95 % CI = [-0.71, 0.16], P = 0.22) and adverse events (MD = 1.30, 95 % CI = [0.49, 3.45], P = 0.60). The outcomes of tDCS treatment for depression and anxiety were inconsistent. tDCS did not enhance or impair cognitive function.

Conclusion

tDCS can reduce SF but has no effect on epileptiform discharges in patients with epilepsy. The current evidence is limited to support tDCS treatment for depression, anxiety, and cognitive function in epilepsy patients. Future studies should be standardized and personalized, ensure higher methodological rigor, and probe long-term effects to prove the findings further.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Complementary therapies in medicine
Complementary therapies in medicine 医学-全科医学与补充医学
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
2.80%
发文量
101
审稿时长
112 days
期刊介绍: Complementary Therapies in Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed journal that has considerable appeal to anyone who seeks objective and critical information on complementary therapies or who wishes to deepen their understanding of these approaches. It will be of particular interest to healthcare practitioners including family practitioners, complementary therapists, nurses, and physiotherapists; to academics including social scientists and CAM researchers; to healthcare managers; and to patients. Complementary Therapies in Medicine aims to publish valid, relevant and rigorous research and serious discussion articles with the main purpose of improving healthcare.
期刊最新文献
The safety and effectiveness of tDCS for epileptic patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis Effects of acupuncture-related intervention on chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy and quality of life: An umbrella review The effect of Snoezelen intervention on problem behaviors in children with cerebral palsy: A randomized controlled trial Transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation for hypertension complicated by anxiety or sleep disorders: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Language function improvement and cortical activity alteration using scalp acupuncture coupled with speech-language training in post-stroke aphasia: A randomised controlled study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1