Nitrogen-loaded biochar for environmental management: Enhancing nitrogen utilization balance in farmland, mitigating ammonia volatilization, and improving fertilizer efficiency

IF 6.7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY Environmental Technology & Innovation Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.eti.2024.104006
Hongyang Chen , Hanmi Zhou , Yang Sun , Xiaolong Liu , Qi Wu , Daocai Chi
{"title":"Nitrogen-loaded biochar for environmental management: Enhancing nitrogen utilization balance in farmland, mitigating ammonia volatilization, and improving fertilizer efficiency","authors":"Hongyang Chen ,&nbsp;Hanmi Zhou ,&nbsp;Yang Sun ,&nbsp;Xiaolong Liu ,&nbsp;Qi Wu ,&nbsp;Daocai Chi","doi":"10.1016/j.eti.2024.104006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Although biochar was widely applied to improve crop yield, it can also trigger increased ammonia volatilization, thereby deteriorating the environment of rice paddies. Therefore, to continuously supply available nitrogen (N) and mitigate ammonia volatilization in rice fields, a two-year field experiment was conducted with nitrogen-loaded biochar (NLB) combined with less N fertilizer. The treatments included 10 or 20 t·ha<sup>−1</sup> NLB+ 100 % urea (T1, T2); 10 or 20 t·ha<sup>−1</sup> NLB+ 75 % urea (T3, T4); and a control with 100 % urea without NLB (CK). Results indicated the ammonia volatilization accumulation of T3 and T4 treatments was significantly reduced by 13.30–20.96 % compared to CK treatment. T2 treatment significantly increased rice yield by 6.94–11.15 % and 1000-grain weight by 9.78–11.59 %, while the T4 treatment maintained rice yield, due to NLB effectively N compensating and promoting the formation of 1000-grain weight and panicle numbers. Under T4 N management, crop growth and yield were promoted primarily because stable N release better matched the N demands of rice plants in later growth stages. The slow-release N persisted over 30 days in the later stages, increasing soil NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>-N by 13.72 %. The N nutrition index (NNI) of T2, T3, and CK was far from 1, while T4’s NNI was close to 1, indicating that T4 provided an optimal N supply. In conclusion, the combination of NLB and 75 % N fertilizer effectively mitigated ammonia volatilization in rice paddies and maintains yield stability. This study provided a benefit guidance for agricultural environmental protection in Northeast China.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11725,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Technology & Innovation","volume":"37 ","pages":"Article 104006"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Technology & Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352186424004826","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although biochar was widely applied to improve crop yield, it can also trigger increased ammonia volatilization, thereby deteriorating the environment of rice paddies. Therefore, to continuously supply available nitrogen (N) and mitigate ammonia volatilization in rice fields, a two-year field experiment was conducted with nitrogen-loaded biochar (NLB) combined with less N fertilizer. The treatments included 10 or 20 t·ha−1 NLB+ 100 % urea (T1, T2); 10 or 20 t·ha−1 NLB+ 75 % urea (T3, T4); and a control with 100 % urea without NLB (CK). Results indicated the ammonia volatilization accumulation of T3 and T4 treatments was significantly reduced by 13.30–20.96 % compared to CK treatment. T2 treatment significantly increased rice yield by 6.94–11.15 % and 1000-grain weight by 9.78–11.59 %, while the T4 treatment maintained rice yield, due to NLB effectively N compensating and promoting the formation of 1000-grain weight and panicle numbers. Under T4 N management, crop growth and yield were promoted primarily because stable N release better matched the N demands of rice plants in later growth stages. The slow-release N persisted over 30 days in the later stages, increasing soil NH4+-N by 13.72 %. The N nutrition index (NNI) of T2, T3, and CK was far from 1, while T4’s NNI was close to 1, indicating that T4 provided an optimal N supply. In conclusion, the combination of NLB and 75 % N fertilizer effectively mitigated ammonia volatilization in rice paddies and maintains yield stability. This study provided a benefit guidance for agricultural environmental protection in Northeast China.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
虽然生物炭被广泛应用于提高作物产量,但它也会导致氨挥发增加,从而恶化稻田环境。因此,为了持续供应可用氮(N)并减少稻田中的氨挥发,我们使用含氮生物炭(NLB)结合较少的氮肥进行了为期两年的田间试验。处理包括 10 或 20 吨/公顷-1 NLB+100% 尿素(T1、T2);10 或 20 吨/公顷-1 NLB+75% 尿素(T3、T4);以及不施 NLB 的 100% 尿素对照(CK)。结果表明,与 CK 处理相比,T3 和 T4 处理的氨挥发积累显著减少了 13.30-20.96%。T2 处理使水稻产量提高了 6.94-11.15 %,千粒重提高了 9.78-11.59 %,而 T4 处理则保持了水稻产量,这是由于 NLB 有效地补偿了氮,促进了千粒重和圆锥花序数的形成。在 T4 氮肥管理下,作物的生长和产量得到了提高,这主要是因为稳定的氮释放能更好地满足水稻植株在生长后期对氮的需求。缓释氮在后期持续 30 天,使土壤中的 NH4+-N 增加了 13.72%。T2、T3 和 CK 的氮营养指数(NNI)远低于 1,而 T4 的 NNI 接近 1,表明 T4 提供了最佳的氮供应。总之,NLB 和 75% 氮肥的组合能有效缓解稻田中的氨挥发,并保持稳定的产量。该研究为东北地区的农业环境保护提供了有益的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Technology & Innovation
Environmental Technology & Innovation Environmental Science-General Environmental Science
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
4.20%
发文量
435
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Technology & Innovation adopts a challenge-oriented approach to solutions by integrating natural sciences to promote a sustainable future. The journal aims to foster the creation and development of innovative products, technologies, and ideas that enhance the environment, with impacts across soil, air, water, and food in rural and urban areas. As a platform for disseminating scientific evidence for environmental protection and sustainable development, the journal emphasizes fundamental science, methodologies, tools, techniques, and policy considerations. It emphasizes the importance of science and technology in environmental benefits, including smarter, cleaner technologies for environmental protection, more efficient resource processing methods, and the evidence supporting their effectiveness.
期刊最新文献
Real-time monitoring of methyl orange degradation in non-thermal plasma by integrating Raman spectroscopy with a hybrid machine learning model Effect of multi-stage inoculation on the efficiency of hyperthermophilic composting of cationic polyacrylamide-containing sludge An accelerated kinetic leach test for geochemical and environmental characterisation of acid and metalliferous drainage Water sample stability A calibration approach for a passive sampler based on a polymer inclusion membrane (PIM) for in situ Zn monitoring in Catalan rivers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1