Water sample stability

IF 7.1 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY Environmental Technology & Innovation Pub Date : 2025-02-15 DOI:10.1016/j.eti.2025.104080
Lionel PINEAU , Vanessa CORDIER
{"title":"Water sample stability","authors":"Lionel PINEAU ,&nbsp;Vanessa CORDIER","doi":"10.1016/j.eti.2025.104080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Numerous guidelines have been issued on the conditions under which water samples should be transported and stored before microbiological analysis. These recommendations are often very restrictive regarding the maximum acceptable storage time (MAST) of samples before analysis and they generate operational constraints that have significant economic and environmental consequences (e.g. samples rejected, unjustified prolongation of quarantine of a water supply point or medical device, recontrol,…). Unfortunately, the relevance of these MAST has never been demonstrated. This study investigates bacterial flora evolution in water samples according to their storage time before analysis. The first part, conducted in laboratory conditions follows the concentration of microorganisms in artificially contaminated water samples. The second part involves a retrospective analysis of real water sample results to verify whether the results varied statistically according to the sample storage time before analysis. The results of the laboratory study confirm that the microorganism concentration in the artificially contaminated samples vary by less than 25 % during the storage time. The second part of the study demonstrates that the ratio of samples belonging to the different result groups (e.g. &lt; 1 CFU/ X mL, between 1 and 99 CFU/X mL and ≥ 100 CFU/100 mL) remains unchanged according to storage time (variation &lt; 1 %). These findings confirm that it is possible to increase the MAST defined in standards, up to 26 h or 28 h according to the microorganism considered (instead of 12 h or 18 h) without compromising the validity of microbiological analysis. These changes should limit the operational, environmental, and economic constraints associated with the actual MAST by reducing the number of samples rejected and consecutively the number of recontrols.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11725,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Technology & Innovation","volume":"38 ","pages":"Article 104080"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Technology & Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352186425000665","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Numerous guidelines have been issued on the conditions under which water samples should be transported and stored before microbiological analysis. These recommendations are often very restrictive regarding the maximum acceptable storage time (MAST) of samples before analysis and they generate operational constraints that have significant economic and environmental consequences (e.g. samples rejected, unjustified prolongation of quarantine of a water supply point or medical device, recontrol,…). Unfortunately, the relevance of these MAST has never been demonstrated. This study investigates bacterial flora evolution in water samples according to their storage time before analysis. The first part, conducted in laboratory conditions follows the concentration of microorganisms in artificially contaminated water samples. The second part involves a retrospective analysis of real water sample results to verify whether the results varied statistically according to the sample storage time before analysis. The results of the laboratory study confirm that the microorganism concentration in the artificially contaminated samples vary by less than 25 % during the storage time. The second part of the study demonstrates that the ratio of samples belonging to the different result groups (e.g. < 1 CFU/ X mL, between 1 and 99 CFU/X mL and ≥ 100 CFU/100 mL) remains unchanged according to storage time (variation < 1 %). These findings confirm that it is possible to increase the MAST defined in standards, up to 26 h or 28 h according to the microorganism considered (instead of 12 h or 18 h) without compromising the validity of microbiological analysis. These changes should limit the operational, environmental, and economic constraints associated with the actual MAST by reducing the number of samples rejected and consecutively the number of recontrols.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
水样稳定性
关于在进行微生物分析之前运输和储存水样的条件,已经发布了许多指导方针。这些建议通常对分析前样品的最大可接受储存时间(MAST)有非常严格的限制,并产生具有重大经济和环境后果的操作限制(例如,拒绝接受样品、不合理地延长供水点或医疗设备的检疫、重新控制等)。不幸的是,这些MAST的相关性从未得到证实。根据分析前水样的保存时间,研究了水样中细菌菌群的演变。第一部分在实验室条件下进行,跟踪人工污染水样中的微生物浓度。第二部分是对实际水样结果进行回顾性分析,验证分析前的水样储存时间是否会使结果发生统计学上的变化。实验室研究结果证实,在储存期间,人工污染样品中的微生物浓度变化小于25 %。研究的第二部分表明,属于不同结果组的样本比例(例如<;1 CFU/X mL, 1 ~ 99 CFU/X mL和≥100 CFU/100 mL)根据储存时间保持不变(变化<;1 %)。这些发现证实,在不影响微生物分析有效性的情况下,可以根据所考虑的微生物将标准中定义的MAST增加到26 h或28 h(而不是12 h或18 h)。这些变化应该通过减少拒绝样品的数量和连续的再控制数量来限制与实际MAST相关的操作、环境和经济约束。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Technology & Innovation
Environmental Technology & Innovation Environmental Science-General Environmental Science
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
4.20%
发文量
435
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Technology & Innovation adopts a challenge-oriented approach to solutions by integrating natural sciences to promote a sustainable future. The journal aims to foster the creation and development of innovative products, technologies, and ideas that enhance the environment, with impacts across soil, air, water, and food in rural and urban areas. As a platform for disseminating scientific evidence for environmental protection and sustainable development, the journal emphasizes fundamental science, methodologies, tools, techniques, and policy considerations. It emphasizes the importance of science and technology in environmental benefits, including smarter, cleaner technologies for environmental protection, more efficient resource processing methods, and the evidence supporting their effectiveness.
期刊最新文献
Ce2Mo3O12/g-C3N4 nanocomposites: Optimization of synthesis parameters, characterization, and study as a potential hydrogen storage material Sustainable biodiesel production from waste cooking oil: Process design and techno-economic comparison of homogeneous and heterogeneous catalysis Exploring the intrinsic mechanism of the effects of multicomponent gases on methane oxidation under explosion condition Sustainable metal–carbon composite derived from pharmaceutical waste: Using expired acetaminophen and aluminum ion precursors for photoreduction of Cr(VI) under visible light Explainable machine learning links organic-matter stress to microbial controls of sedimentary ammonium accumulation in marsh-type shallow lakes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1