The AI attribution gap: Encouraging transparent acknowledgment in the age of AI

IF 3.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Intelligence Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.intell.2024.101880
Gilles E. Gignac
{"title":"The AI attribution gap: Encouraging transparent acknowledgment in the age of AI","authors":"Gilles E. Gignac","doi":"10.1016/j.intell.2024.101880","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI), including large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Mistral, along with specialized tools such as Google DeepMind's AlphaFold 3, is transforming the scientific discovery process. These advancements raise questions about attribution in scientific research, challenging traditional notions about the origins of discovery and the roles of human and machine collaboration. Anonymous surveys indicate that 50 to 70% of academics involved in research use AI tools. Yet, an analysis of 568 articles from three psychology Elsevier journals revealed that approximately 3.5% of these articles published since mid-2023 included an AI declaration. The reluctance of researchers to use or acknowledge AI tools can hinder scientific progress by promoting a culture wary of AI, slowing tool adoption, and limiting shared learning about their uses and limitations. Researchers are encouraged to use AI tools responsibly and detail such use in their acknowledgements to help foster a culture of transparency and innovation in scientific research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13862,"journal":{"name":"Intelligence","volume":"108 ","pages":"Article 101880"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289624000746","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI), including large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Mistral, along with specialized tools such as Google DeepMind's AlphaFold 3, is transforming the scientific discovery process. These advancements raise questions about attribution in scientific research, challenging traditional notions about the origins of discovery and the roles of human and machine collaboration. Anonymous surveys indicate that 50 to 70% of academics involved in research use AI tools. Yet, an analysis of 568 articles from three psychology Elsevier journals revealed that approximately 3.5% of these articles published since mid-2023 included an AI declaration. The reluctance of researchers to use or acknowledge AI tools can hinder scientific progress by promoting a culture wary of AI, slowing tool adoption, and limiting shared learning about their uses and limitations. Researchers are encouraged to use AI tools responsibly and detail such use in their acknowledgements to help foster a culture of transparency and innovation in scientific research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人工智能的归属差距:在人工智能时代鼓励透明认可
人工智能(AI),包括 ChatGPT、Claude、Gemini 和 Mistral 等大型语言模型(LLM),以及谷歌 DeepMind 的 AlphaFold 3 等专业工具的整合,正在改变科学发现的过程。这些进步提出了科学研究中的归属问题,挑战了关于发现的起源以及人类和机器协作作用的传统观念。匿名调查显示,50% 到 70% 参与研究的学者使用人工智能工具。然而,对 Elsevier 三家心理学期刊的 568 篇文章进行分析后发现,自 2023 年中期以来发表的这些文章中,约有 3.5% 包含人工智能声明。研究人员不愿使用或承认人工智能工具,会助长一种对人工智能持谨慎态度的文化,减缓工具的采用速度,并限制对其用途和局限性的共同学习,从而阻碍科学进步。我们鼓励研究人员负责任地使用人工智能工具,并在致谢中详细说明使用情况,以帮助在科学研究中培养透明和创新的文化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Intelligence
Intelligence PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
13.30%
发文量
64
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: This unique journal in psychology is devoted to publishing original research and theoretical studies and review papers that substantially contribute to the understanding of intelligence. It provides a new source of significant papers in psychometrics, tests and measurement, and all other empirical and theoretical studies in intelligence and mental retardation.
期刊最新文献
Looking beyond students' exploration and learning strategies: The role of test-taking effort in complex problem-solving Reconsidering the search for alternatives to general mental ability tests Putting the Flynn effect under the microscope: Item-level patterns in NLSYC PIAT-math scores, 1986–2004 Editorial Board The AI attribution gap: Encouraging transparent acknowledgment in the age of AI
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1