Ana Carolina da C. Ribeiro , Jean C.G. Ortega , Luis Mauricio Bini , Viviane G. Ferro , Arthur A. Bispo , Wanessa Fernandes Carvalho , Fausto Nomura , Marcus Vinicius Cianciaruso
{"title":"The effect of fire on the structure of animal metacommunities in a Cerrado landscape: A 10-year survey of anurans, birds and moth assemblages","authors":"Ana Carolina da C. Ribeiro , Jean C.G. Ortega , Luis Mauricio Bini , Viviane G. Ferro , Arthur A. Bispo , Wanessa Fernandes Carvalho , Fausto Nomura , Marcus Vinicius Cianciaruso","doi":"10.1016/j.jnc.2025.126856","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We investigated the impact of a human-caused fire on four animal communities (birds, moths, and adults and larvae of anurans) within Emas National Park, Brazil, over a 10-year period. We compared community descriptors (mean abundance, species richness, and beta diversity) before and after the fire using an interrupted time series regression model. We found a significant impact of fire on the avian community, with all measured descriptors indicated a process of biotic homogenization, that is, a reduction in beta diversity, suggesting that sampled sites become more similar in species composition, and a decline in species richness that indicates dominance by a few bird species. Conversely, the fire’s effect on moth and anuran communities appeared less pronounced, while the abundance and species richness in tadpole communities were increasing over time, different of the response of adult anuran communities, that randomly oscillated over time. At first, we expected that moths would be more vulnerable to fire than birds, since moths have lower dispersal ability than birds, with anuran communities less affected, although we were not able to identify the causes that make avian communities more vulnerable than the moth and anuran communities. We suggest that the lack of nearby refuges and larger home range requirements may be the key factors in understanding avian vulnerability to catastrophic fire events.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54898,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Nature Conservation","volume":"84 ","pages":"Article 126856"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Nature Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1617138125000330","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We investigated the impact of a human-caused fire on four animal communities (birds, moths, and adults and larvae of anurans) within Emas National Park, Brazil, over a 10-year period. We compared community descriptors (mean abundance, species richness, and beta diversity) before and after the fire using an interrupted time series regression model. We found a significant impact of fire on the avian community, with all measured descriptors indicated a process of biotic homogenization, that is, a reduction in beta diversity, suggesting that sampled sites become more similar in species composition, and a decline in species richness that indicates dominance by a few bird species. Conversely, the fire’s effect on moth and anuran communities appeared less pronounced, while the abundance and species richness in tadpole communities were increasing over time, different of the response of adult anuran communities, that randomly oscillated over time. At first, we expected that moths would be more vulnerable to fire than birds, since moths have lower dispersal ability than birds, with anuran communities less affected, although we were not able to identify the causes that make avian communities more vulnerable than the moth and anuran communities. We suggest that the lack of nearby refuges and larger home range requirements may be the key factors in understanding avian vulnerability to catastrophic fire events.
期刊介绍:
The Journal for Nature Conservation addresses concepts, methods and techniques for nature conservation. This international and interdisciplinary journal encourages collaboration between scientists and practitioners, including the integration of biodiversity issues with social and economic concepts. Therefore, conceptual, technical and methodological papers, as well as reviews, research papers, and short communications are welcomed from a wide range of disciplines, including theoretical ecology, landscape ecology, restoration ecology, ecological modelling, and others, provided that there is a clear connection and immediate relevance to nature conservation.
Manuscripts without any immediate conservation context, such as inventories, distribution modelling, genetic studies, animal behaviour, plant physiology, will not be considered for this journal; though such data may be useful for conservationists and managers in the future, this is outside of the current scope of the journal.