Do different speculation strategies cause distinct impacts on the volatility of the live cattle futures in Brazil?

IF 3.7 4区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Commodity Markets Pub Date : 2025-01-11 DOI:10.1016/j.jcomm.2025.100458
Augusto Seabra Santos, Alexandre Nunes Almeida
{"title":"Do different speculation strategies cause distinct impacts on the volatility of the live cattle futures in Brazil?","authors":"Augusto Seabra Santos,&nbsp;Alexandre Nunes Almeida","doi":"10.1016/j.jcomm.2025.100458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study explores the relationship between speculators and the volatility of live cattle futures in Brazil, focusing on two distinct categories of speculation: day traders (and scalpers) and institutional investors. Analyzing the nearest and October contracts from 2006 to 2019, the research employs the ARIMA-GARCH methodology to estimate volatilities. Additional analyses are conducted to estimate the expected and unexpected effects of speculators on the previously determined volatility levels. Our findings indicate that day trader speculators heighten the volatility of contracts nearing expiration, primarily due to their unexpected actions and limited market information usage. They tend to buy high and sell low. In contrast, institutional investors, with access to more comprehensive information, have a moderate influence on volatility, capable of strategically maneuvering market distortions. The accuracy of the conclusions is strengthened by robustness and placebo tests.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":45111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Commodity Markets","volume":"37 ","pages":"Article 100458"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Commodity Markets","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405851325000029","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explores the relationship between speculators and the volatility of live cattle futures in Brazil, focusing on two distinct categories of speculation: day traders (and scalpers) and institutional investors. Analyzing the nearest and October contracts from 2006 to 2019, the research employs the ARIMA-GARCH methodology to estimate volatilities. Additional analyses are conducted to estimate the expected and unexpected effects of speculators on the previously determined volatility levels. Our findings indicate that day trader speculators heighten the volatility of contracts nearing expiration, primarily due to their unexpected actions and limited market information usage. They tend to buy high and sell low. In contrast, institutional investors, with access to more comprehensive information, have a moderate influence on volatility, capable of strategically maneuvering market distortions. The accuracy of the conclusions is strengthened by robustness and placebo tests.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同的投机策略会对巴西活牛期货的波动产生不同的影响吗?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
2.40%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: The purpose of the journal is also to stimulate international dialog among academics, industry participants, traders, investors, and policymakers with mutual interests in commodity markets. The mandate for the journal is to present ongoing work within commodity economics and finance. Topics can be related to financialization of commodity markets; pricing, hedging, and risk analysis of commodity derivatives; risk premia in commodity markets; real option analysis for commodity project investment and production; portfolio allocation including commodities; forecasting in commodity markets; corporate finance for commodity-exposed corporations; econometric/statistical analysis of commodity markets; organization of commodity markets; regulation of commodity markets; local and global commodity trading; and commodity supply chains. Commodity markets in this context are energy markets (including renewables), metal markets, mineral markets, agricultural markets, livestock and fish markets, markets for weather derivatives, emission markets, shipping markets, water, and related markets. This interdisciplinary and trans-disciplinary journal will cover all commodity markets and is thus relevant for a broad audience. Commodity markets are not only of academic interest but also highly relevant for many practitioners, including asset managers, industrial managers, investment bankers, risk managers, and also policymakers in governments, central banks, and supranational institutions.
期刊最新文献
A quantitative model of sustainability risk in finance Do different speculation strategies cause distinct impacts on the volatility of the live cattle futures in Brazil? Extrapolating the long-term seasonal component of electricity prices for forecasting in the day-ahead market Editorial Board Time to get mature: Collateral, flexibility and the hedging horizon decision
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1