Examining perceived spillovers among climate risk, fossil fuel, renewable energy, and carbon markets: A higher-order moment and quantile analysis

IF 3.7 4区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Commodity Markets Pub Date : 2025-03-06 DOI:10.1016/j.jcomm.2025.100470
Jinxin Cui , Aktham Maghyereh
{"title":"Examining perceived spillovers among climate risk, fossil fuel, renewable energy, and carbon markets: A higher-order moment and quantile analysis","authors":"Jinxin Cui ,&nbsp;Aktham Maghyereh","doi":"10.1016/j.jcomm.2025.100470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The complex risks of global climate change and the transition to a sustainable economy have increasingly become central to research and policy debates. Climate risk perceptions influence fossil fuel, renewable energy, and carbon markets through both investment behavior and regulatory policy channels. Understanding the spillovers between climate risk perceptions and commodity markets has profound implications for sustainable investments and risk management strategies. This paper extends the existing literature by examining higher-order moment risk spillovers among perceptions of climate physical risks (CPR) and transition risks (CTR), fossil fuel, renewable energy, and carbon markets across different quantiles. Furthermore, this paper also proposes an analytical framework that integrates ex-post moment measures with an innovative QVAR extended joint connectedness approach. Our empirical analysis reveals that the connectedness outcomes are contingent upon moment orders and specific quantile levels. Notably, total spillovers are markedly higher at the extreme quantiles (especially at the 0.95 quantile) compared to the median quantile. Importantly, CPRI and CTRI serve as net transmitters of spillovers at the 0.05 and 0.95 quantiles but shift to being net recipients under normal market conditions. The directional net spillovers transmitted from climate risk perceptions to energy and carbon markets are more pronounced and consistent at the extreme higher and lower quantiles. Finally, we find that dynamic total spillovers of skewness and kurtosis at extreme quantiles are more volatile than at the median, with significant sensitivity to major events such as the COVID-19 pandemic, the Russia-Ukraine war, the Israel-Hamas war, extreme climate disasters, and the United Nations Climate Change Conferences.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":45111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Commodity Markets","volume":"38 ","pages":"Article 100470"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Commodity Markets","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405851325000145","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The complex risks of global climate change and the transition to a sustainable economy have increasingly become central to research and policy debates. Climate risk perceptions influence fossil fuel, renewable energy, and carbon markets through both investment behavior and regulatory policy channels. Understanding the spillovers between climate risk perceptions and commodity markets has profound implications for sustainable investments and risk management strategies. This paper extends the existing literature by examining higher-order moment risk spillovers among perceptions of climate physical risks (CPR) and transition risks (CTR), fossil fuel, renewable energy, and carbon markets across different quantiles. Furthermore, this paper also proposes an analytical framework that integrates ex-post moment measures with an innovative QVAR extended joint connectedness approach. Our empirical analysis reveals that the connectedness outcomes are contingent upon moment orders and specific quantile levels. Notably, total spillovers are markedly higher at the extreme quantiles (especially at the 0.95 quantile) compared to the median quantile. Importantly, CPRI and CTRI serve as net transmitters of spillovers at the 0.05 and 0.95 quantiles but shift to being net recipients under normal market conditions. The directional net spillovers transmitted from climate risk perceptions to energy and carbon markets are more pronounced and consistent at the extreme higher and lower quantiles. Finally, we find that dynamic total spillovers of skewness and kurtosis at extreme quantiles are more volatile than at the median, with significant sensitivity to major events such as the COVID-19 pandemic, the Russia-Ukraine war, the Israel-Hamas war, extreme climate disasters, and the United Nations Climate Change Conferences.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
2.40%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: The purpose of the journal is also to stimulate international dialog among academics, industry participants, traders, investors, and policymakers with mutual interests in commodity markets. The mandate for the journal is to present ongoing work within commodity economics and finance. Topics can be related to financialization of commodity markets; pricing, hedging, and risk analysis of commodity derivatives; risk premia in commodity markets; real option analysis for commodity project investment and production; portfolio allocation including commodities; forecasting in commodity markets; corporate finance for commodity-exposed corporations; econometric/statistical analysis of commodity markets; organization of commodity markets; regulation of commodity markets; local and global commodity trading; and commodity supply chains. Commodity markets in this context are energy markets (including renewables), metal markets, mineral markets, agricultural markets, livestock and fish markets, markets for weather derivatives, emission markets, shipping markets, water, and related markets. This interdisciplinary and trans-disciplinary journal will cover all commodity markets and is thus relevant for a broad audience. Commodity markets are not only of academic interest but also highly relevant for many practitioners, including asset managers, industrial managers, investment bankers, risk managers, and also policymakers in governments, central banks, and supranational institutions.
期刊最新文献
Examining perceived spillovers among climate risk, fossil fuel, renewable energy, and carbon markets: A higher-order moment and quantile analysis Editorial Board The short- and long-run cyclical variation of the cross-asset nexus: Mixed-frequency evidence on financial and ‘financialised’ assets The pass-through of macro variable to volatility co-movement among U.S. currency and commodity futures markets system Media emotion intensity and commodity futures pricing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1