Multi-objective optimization of work package scheme problem to minimize project carbon emissions and cost

IF 6.5 1区 工程技术 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Computers & Industrial Engineering Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-26 DOI:10.1016/j.cie.2024.110831
Yaning Zhang , Xiao Li , Yue Teng , Geoffrey Q.P. Shen , Sijun Bai
{"title":"Multi-objective optimization of work package scheme problem to minimize project carbon emissions and cost","authors":"Yaning Zhang ,&nbsp;Xiao Li ,&nbsp;Yue Teng ,&nbsp;Geoffrey Q.P. Shen ,&nbsp;Sijun Bai","doi":"10.1016/j.cie.2024.110831","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The construction industry accounts for around 30% of global energy consumption and 33% of CO<sub>2</sub> emissions. For the carbon neutrality initiative, reducing carbon emissions from construction projects become a critical objective for project success. However, a dilemma arises in balancing carbon emissions and project cost, particularly during the work package-based project planning phase. To address this issue, this article presents a novel multi-objective optimization model for the work package scheme problem, aimed at minimizing both project carbon emissions and cost. Multi-objective Evolutionary Algorithms (EAs) are developed to solve the model. Firstly, a multi-objective Mixed-Integer Programming (MIP) model is developed to establish the functional relation between work package attributes (duration and work content) and optimization objectives (carbon emissions and cost). Secondly, two multi-objective optimization EAs, NSGA-II and SPEA2, are developed to obtain the Pareto frontier. The experimental results indicate that NSGA-II and SPEA2 exhibit superior trade-off capabilities compared to the Gurobi and the state-of-the-art heuristic algorithm. Compared to Gurobi, the proposed EAs achieve an approximately 68% reduction in carbon emissions, accompanied by about an 11% cost increase. Compared to the heuristic algorithm, the EAs achieve around 10% reductions in carbon emissions with an approximately 5% cost increase. Additionally, sensitivity analysis conducted on a project instance dataset demonstrates the robustness of the proposed model and algorithms. This article paves the way for achieving low-carbon and sustainable construction project management in the context of carbon neutrality.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55220,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Industrial Engineering","volume":"200 ","pages":"Article 110831"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Industrial Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360835224009537","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The construction industry accounts for around 30% of global energy consumption and 33% of CO2 emissions. For the carbon neutrality initiative, reducing carbon emissions from construction projects become a critical objective for project success. However, a dilemma arises in balancing carbon emissions and project cost, particularly during the work package-based project planning phase. To address this issue, this article presents a novel multi-objective optimization model for the work package scheme problem, aimed at minimizing both project carbon emissions and cost. Multi-objective Evolutionary Algorithms (EAs) are developed to solve the model. Firstly, a multi-objective Mixed-Integer Programming (MIP) model is developed to establish the functional relation between work package attributes (duration and work content) and optimization objectives (carbon emissions and cost). Secondly, two multi-objective optimization EAs, NSGA-II and SPEA2, are developed to obtain the Pareto frontier. The experimental results indicate that NSGA-II and SPEA2 exhibit superior trade-off capabilities compared to the Gurobi and the state-of-the-art heuristic algorithm. Compared to Gurobi, the proposed EAs achieve an approximately 68% reduction in carbon emissions, accompanied by about an 11% cost increase. Compared to the heuristic algorithm, the EAs achieve around 10% reductions in carbon emissions with an approximately 5% cost increase. Additionally, sensitivity analysis conducted on a project instance dataset demonstrates the robustness of the proposed model and algorithms. This article paves the way for achieving low-carbon and sustainable construction project management in the context of carbon neutrality.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多目标优化工作包方案问题,最大限度减少项目碳排放和成本
建筑业约占全球能源消耗的30%,二氧化碳排放量的33%。对于碳中和倡议,减少建筑项目的碳排放成为项目成功的关键目标。但是,在平衡碳排放和项目成本方面出现了一个难题,特别是在基于工作包的项目规划阶段。为了解决这一问题,本文提出了一种新的多目标优化模型,以最小化项目碳排放和成本为目标。采用多目标进化算法求解该模型。首先,建立多目标混合整数规划(MIP)模型,建立工作包属性(工期、工作内容)与优化目标(碳排放、成本)之间的函数关系;其次,采用NSGA-II和SPEA2两种多目标优化算法求解Pareto边界;实验结果表明,与Gurobi和最先进的启发式算法相比,NSGA-II和SPEA2具有更好的权衡能力。与内罗毕相比,拟议的ea减少了约68%的碳排放,同时成本增加了约11%。与启发式算法相比,ea减少了约10%的碳排放,成本增加了约5%。此外,对一个项目实例数据集进行的敏感性分析表明,所提出的模型和算法具有鲁棒性。本文为实现碳中和背景下的低碳可持续建设项目管理铺平了道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Computers & Industrial Engineering
Computers & Industrial Engineering 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
12.70%
发文量
794
审稿时长
10.6 months
期刊介绍: Computers & Industrial Engineering (CAIE) is dedicated to researchers, educators, and practitioners in industrial engineering and related fields. Pioneering the integration of computers in research, education, and practice, industrial engineering has evolved to make computers and electronic communication integral to its domain. CAIE publishes original contributions focusing on the development of novel computerized methodologies to address industrial engineering problems. It also highlights the applications of these methodologies to issues within the broader industrial engineering and associated communities. The journal actively encourages submissions that push the boundaries of fundamental theories and concepts in industrial engineering techniques.
期刊最新文献
Dynamic scheduling of automated manufacturing systems under logical and temporal constrains using staged Q-learning with curriculum guidance A domain knowledge-enhanced MBSE framework for developing knowledge-based inspection systems: A case study on overhead crane inspection Coordinated planning of autonomous rail rapid transit trains with flexible coupling operations and demand-responsive high-speed rail shuttle buses with same-platform transfers Remaining useful life prediction of systems under time-varying conditions based on dynamic weighted information fusion and an adaptive UKF Research on emergency material warehouse location and inventory prepositioning planning for pre-disaster response
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1