Genomic selection based on random regression test-day model in dairy cattle with respect to different reference populations

Animal - Open Space Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-09 DOI:10.1016/j.anopes.2024.100087
Xianming Wei , Jun Teng , Shixi Zhang , Changheng Zhao , Guilin Chen , Zhi Cao , Yan Chen , Jianbin Li , Chao Ning , Qin Zhang
{"title":"Genomic selection based on random regression test-day model in dairy cattle with respect to different reference populations","authors":"Xianming Wei ,&nbsp;Jun Teng ,&nbsp;Shixi Zhang ,&nbsp;Changheng Zhao ,&nbsp;Guilin Chen ,&nbsp;Zhi Cao ,&nbsp;Yan Chen ,&nbsp;Jianbin Li ,&nbsp;Chao Ning ,&nbsp;Qin Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.anopes.2024.100087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In this study, we applied random regression test-day model for genomic prediction in the Holstein population in Shandong Province of China with respect to different reference populations, using either 150 k chip genotypes or imputed sequence genotypes. Three different reference populations were considered, i.e., the Shandong (<strong>SD</strong>) reference population consisting of 1 688 Holstein cows from Shandong Province, the Non-SD reference population consisting of 5 299 Holstein cows from other parts of China, and the combined population of the two. The SD reference resulted in higher prediction accuracy than the Non-SD reference, although the former was much smaller than the latter. The combined reference further increased the accuracy. These results indicate that the accuracy of genomic prediction cross-population within breed is low, even though the reference population is large. Using imputed sequence data may not significantly improve the cross-population prediction ability. However, the inclusion of data from other populations into the reference population can improve the accuracy of genomic selection.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100083,"journal":{"name":"Animal - Open Space","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100087"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal - Open Space","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277269402400027X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, we applied random regression test-day model for genomic prediction in the Holstein population in Shandong Province of China with respect to different reference populations, using either 150 k chip genotypes or imputed sequence genotypes. Three different reference populations were considered, i.e., the Shandong (SD) reference population consisting of 1 688 Holstein cows from Shandong Province, the Non-SD reference population consisting of 5 299 Holstein cows from other parts of China, and the combined population of the two. The SD reference resulted in higher prediction accuracy than the Non-SD reference, although the former was much smaller than the latter. The combined reference further increased the accuracy. These results indicate that the accuracy of genomic prediction cross-population within breed is low, even though the reference population is large. Using imputed sequence data may not significantly improve the cross-population prediction ability. However, the inclusion of data from other populations into the reference population can improve the accuracy of genomic selection.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于随机回归试验日模型的不同参考群体奶牛基因组选择
在这项研究中,我们采用随机回归测试日模型对中国山东省荷斯坦种群进行基因组预测,使用150k芯片基因型或输入序列基因型。选取了3个不同的参考种群,即山东(SD)参考种群由山东省的1 688头荷斯坦奶牛组成,非SD参考种群由中国其他地区的5 299头荷斯坦奶牛组成,以及两者的组合种群。SD参考文献的预测精度高于非SD参考文献,尽管前者比后者小得多。联合参考进一步提高了精度。这些结果表明,尽管参考群体很大,但品种内跨群体的基因组预测精度较低。使用输入序列数据可能不会显著提高交叉种群预测能力。然而,将其他种群的数据纳入参考种群可以提高基因组选择的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
On-farm validation of a feeding strategy improving nutritional and technological quality of meat from Duroc crossbred pigs and contributing to relocating feed resources Data paper: Performance of fattening Charolais bulls fed iso-net energy, fibre vs starch rations based on haylage or maize silage, at two levels of intake Estimates of genetic and crossbreeding parameters for reproductive traits of Fogera and its Holstein-Friesian Crosses Effect of oral supplementation of Jackfruit leaf extract on growth performance, faecal bacteria counts, carcass characteristics and meat quality in broiler chickens A genetic analysis of lamb survival to different time points and reasons for lamb death
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1