{"title":"The gestalt of customer centricity: Forces of resistance and research priorities","authors":"Joel E. Urbany, Marta Dapena-Baron","doi":"10.1007/s13162-024-00289-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Recent research suggests a great deal of variance in how “customer centricity” is defined in the increasingly siloed scholarly literature and that many organizations continue to struggle in effectively implementing such initiatives. The interviews reported in Urbany and Dapena-Baron (2024) reveal the complexity of both (a) the many organizational context factors that need to be managed and adapted for a firm with a strong, established customer-centric practice to sustain and evolve it, and (b) the significant forces of resistance which face a firm that is early in its adoption of customer-centric practices. Here, we step back to consider the possibility that the pursuit of customer-centricity is often hindered by underestimation of the complexity, time, and resources required for effective transformation. We suggest that taking a more comprehensive view of customer centricity to consider its broader “Gestalt,” provides value in recognizing and planning for multiple component parts and for potential synergies between them. An overview of these components leads to a number of relevant research directions, centered around <b><i>two overarching priorities</i></b> through the change process: creating distinctive value for customers <b><i>to win demand</i></b> and creating distinctive value for employees <b><i>to win their buy-in</i></b>. We overview the components of customer centricity and present a set of research priorities with the goal of building a greater understanding of the individual component parts and the potential synergies between them.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7786,"journal":{"name":"AMS Review","volume":"14 3-4","pages":"308 - 329"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMS Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13162-024-00289-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Recent research suggests a great deal of variance in how “customer centricity” is defined in the increasingly siloed scholarly literature and that many organizations continue to struggle in effectively implementing such initiatives. The interviews reported in Urbany and Dapena-Baron (2024) reveal the complexity of both (a) the many organizational context factors that need to be managed and adapted for a firm with a strong, established customer-centric practice to sustain and evolve it, and (b) the significant forces of resistance which face a firm that is early in its adoption of customer-centric practices. Here, we step back to consider the possibility that the pursuit of customer-centricity is often hindered by underestimation of the complexity, time, and resources required for effective transformation. We suggest that taking a more comprehensive view of customer centricity to consider its broader “Gestalt,” provides value in recognizing and planning for multiple component parts and for potential synergies between them. An overview of these components leads to a number of relevant research directions, centered around two overarching priorities through the change process: creating distinctive value for customers to win demand and creating distinctive value for employees to win their buy-in. We overview the components of customer centricity and present a set of research priorities with the goal of building a greater understanding of the individual component parts and the potential synergies between them.
AMS ReviewBusiness, Management and Accounting-Marketing
CiteScore
14.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍:
The AMS Review is positioned to be the premier journal in marketing that focuses exclusively on conceptual contributions across all sub-disciplines of marketing. It publishes articles that advance the development of market and marketing theory.The AMS Review is receptive to different philosophical perspectives and levels of analysis that range from micro to macro. Especially welcome are manuscripts that integrate research and theory from non-marketing disciplines such as management, sociology, economics, psychology, geography, anthropology, or other social sciences. Examples of suitable manuscripts include those incorporating conceptual and organizing frameworks or models, those extending, comparing, or critically evaluating existing theories, and those suggesting new or innovative theories. Comprehensive and integrative syntheses of research literatures (including quantitative and qualitative meta-analyses) are encouraged, as are paradigm-shifting manuscripts.Manuscripts that focus on purely descriptive literature reviews, proselytize research methods or techniques, or report empirical research findings will not be considered for publication. The AMS Review does not publish manuscripts focusing on practitioner advice or marketing education.