AI for marketing: Enabler? Engager? Ersatz?

Q1 Business, Management and Accounting AMS Review Pub Date : 2025-01-11 DOI:10.1007/s13162-024-00293-7
Sreedhar Madhavaram, Radha Appan
{"title":"AI for marketing: Enabler? Engager? Ersatz?","authors":"Sreedhar Madhavaram,&nbsp;Radha Appan","doi":"10.1007/s13162-024-00293-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The prospect of artificial intelligence (AI) matching and surpassing human intelligence continues to intrigue. On the foundations of the exceptional advances in AI technologies in the last decade, the potential for competitive advantages makes <i>AI</i> in general and <i>Generative AI</i> in particular one of the most promising technologies for marketing. However, while there are robust theoretical advances in the domain of AI for marketing, how AI impacts marketing entities is poorly understood. Further, how AI potentially makes marketing entities ineffective and inefficient is rarely addressed in research. Therefore, in this research, we begin with the articulation of a theory toolkit relevant to AI for marketing. Second, we discuss different types of AI and introduce a new perspective on approaching AI for marketing entities and purposes. Specifically, we conceptualize three new types of AI: enabling AI, engaging AI, and ersatzing AI (artificial, but inferior intelligence that make marketing entities less capable). Third, using our typology, we explicate the enormous potential of the three specific types of AI for marketing. Finally, toward actualizing the potential of AI for marketing, we conclude with a discussion of the contributions of our research and a research agenda.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7786,"journal":{"name":"AMS Review","volume":"14 3-4","pages":"258 - 277"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMS Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13162-024-00293-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The prospect of artificial intelligence (AI) matching and surpassing human intelligence continues to intrigue. On the foundations of the exceptional advances in AI technologies in the last decade, the potential for competitive advantages makes AI in general and Generative AI in particular one of the most promising technologies for marketing. However, while there are robust theoretical advances in the domain of AI for marketing, how AI impacts marketing entities is poorly understood. Further, how AI potentially makes marketing entities ineffective and inefficient is rarely addressed in research. Therefore, in this research, we begin with the articulation of a theory toolkit relevant to AI for marketing. Second, we discuss different types of AI and introduce a new perspective on approaching AI for marketing entities and purposes. Specifically, we conceptualize three new types of AI: enabling AI, engaging AI, and ersatzing AI (artificial, but inferior intelligence that make marketing entities less capable). Third, using our typology, we explicate the enormous potential of the three specific types of AI for marketing. Finally, toward actualizing the potential of AI for marketing, we conclude with a discussion of the contributions of our research and a research agenda.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
AMS Review
AMS Review Business, Management and Accounting-Marketing
CiteScore
14.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: The AMS Review is positioned to be the premier journal in marketing that focuses exclusively on conceptual contributions across all sub-disciplines of marketing. It publishes articles that advance the development of market and marketing theory.The AMS Review is receptive to different philosophical perspectives and levels of analysis that range from micro to macro. Especially welcome are manuscripts that integrate research and theory from non-marketing disciplines such as management, sociology, economics, psychology, geography, anthropology, or other social sciences. Examples of suitable manuscripts include those incorporating conceptual and organizing frameworks or models, those extending, comparing, or critically evaluating existing theories, and those suggesting new or innovative theories. Comprehensive and integrative syntheses of research literatures (including quantitative and qualitative meta-analyses) are encouraged, as are paradigm-shifting manuscripts.Manuscripts that focus on purely descriptive literature reviews, proselytize research methods or techniques, or report empirical research findings will not be considered for publication.  The AMS Review does not publish manuscripts focusing on practitioner advice or marketing education.
期刊最新文献
The pursuit of customer centricity The gestalt of customer centricity: Forces of resistance and research priorities AI for marketing: Enabler? Engager? Ersatz? The past, present, and future of social media marketing ethics Self-disclosure of content creators: A systematic review and holistic framework
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1