Benefits of movement-based Behaviors on improving erectile function in American men: a nationwide survey study.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Sexual Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-03 eCollection Date: 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1093/sexmed/qfaf003
Yiming Chen, Qianfeng Zhuang, Wei Xia, Naiyuan Shao, Bo Zhang, Xingliang Feng
{"title":"Benefits of movement-based Behaviors on improving erectile function in American men: a nationwide survey study.","authors":"Yiming Chen, Qianfeng Zhuang, Wei Xia, Naiyuan Shao, Bo Zhang, Xingliang Feng","doi":"10.1093/sexmed/qfaf003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a prevalent condition with significant psychological and physiological impacts. Recently, a new concept called movement-based behaviors (MBB) has been proposed, which includes four types of PA: vigorous PA (VPA), moderate-intensity PA (MPA), walking/cycling, and muscle-strengthening activities (MSA), and uses an MBB index (range 0-4) to estimate the combined effects of these activities on health outcomes.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the relationship between different types of physical activities (PA) and ED using the MBB index in a nationally representative sample of U.S. men.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2001-2004, including 3435 male participants. Multivariate logistic regressions were performed to explore the associations, supplemented with subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis.</p><p><strong>Outcomes: </strong>The assessment of PA in this study is based on four self-reported questions from the NHANES Mobile Examination Center interview, including VPA, MPA, walking/cycling, and MSA. The MBB index, ranging from 0 to 4, was used to assess combined PA types. ED was evaluated using a single-question self-assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Higher MBB index values were associated with lower ED risk. Participants with an MBB index of 2 had a significantly lower risk of ED in Model 3 (OR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.43-0.97, P = 0.04). Those with an MBB index of 3 or 4 had the lowest risk of ED across all models, with OR_Model1 = 0.29 (95% CI: 0.21-0.40, P < 0.0001), OR_Model2 = 0.52 (95% CI: 0.37-0.73, P < 0.001), and OR_Model3 = 0.61 (95% CI: 0.41-0.90, P = 0.02). However, this relationship was not significant in subgroups with severe ED or comorbid conditions.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>Our findings can provide clinicians with guidance to help patients personalize their selection of different exercise combinations.</p><p><strong>Strengths and limitations: </strong>We explored the impact of different exercise combinations on reducing ED risk and innovatively proposed the MBB index for a comprehensive assessment of exercise benefits, supported by a large sample size and multivariable adjustments. However, the limitations of cross-sectional design and recall bias cannot be overlooked.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The MBB index effectively demonstrates that combined PA can reduce ED risk, supporting tailored exercise recommendations for patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":21782,"journal":{"name":"Sexual Medicine","volume":"13 1","pages":"qfaf003"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11788418/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexual Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sexmed/qfaf003","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a prevalent condition with significant psychological and physiological impacts. Recently, a new concept called movement-based behaviors (MBB) has been proposed, which includes four types of PA: vigorous PA (VPA), moderate-intensity PA (MPA), walking/cycling, and muscle-strengthening activities (MSA), and uses an MBB index (range 0-4) to estimate the combined effects of these activities on health outcomes.

Aim: This study aims to evaluate the relationship between different types of physical activities (PA) and ED using the MBB index in a nationally representative sample of U.S. men.

Methods: We analyzed data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2001-2004, including 3435 male participants. Multivariate logistic regressions were performed to explore the associations, supplemented with subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis.

Outcomes: The assessment of PA in this study is based on four self-reported questions from the NHANES Mobile Examination Center interview, including VPA, MPA, walking/cycling, and MSA. The MBB index, ranging from 0 to 4, was used to assess combined PA types. ED was evaluated using a single-question self-assessment.

Results: Higher MBB index values were associated with lower ED risk. Participants with an MBB index of 2 had a significantly lower risk of ED in Model 3 (OR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.43-0.97, P = 0.04). Those with an MBB index of 3 or 4 had the lowest risk of ED across all models, with OR_Model1 = 0.29 (95% CI: 0.21-0.40, P < 0.0001), OR_Model2 = 0.52 (95% CI: 0.37-0.73, P < 0.001), and OR_Model3 = 0.61 (95% CI: 0.41-0.90, P = 0.02). However, this relationship was not significant in subgroups with severe ED or comorbid conditions.

Clinical implications: Our findings can provide clinicians with guidance to help patients personalize their selection of different exercise combinations.

Strengths and limitations: We explored the impact of different exercise combinations on reducing ED risk and innovatively proposed the MBB index for a comprehensive assessment of exercise benefits, supported by a large sample size and multivariable adjustments. However, the limitations of cross-sectional design and recall bias cannot be overlooked.

Conclusion: The MBB index effectively demonstrates that combined PA can reduce ED risk, supporting tailored exercise recommendations for patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sexual Medicine
Sexual Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
103
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊介绍: Sexual Medicine is an official publication of the International Society for Sexual Medicine, and serves the field as the peer-reviewed, open access journal for rapid dissemination of multidisciplinary clinical and basic research in all areas of global sexual medicine, and particularly acts as a venue for topics of regional or sub-specialty interest. The journal is focused on issues in clinical medicine and epidemiology but also publishes basic science papers with particular relevance to specific populations. Sexual Medicine offers clinicians and researchers a rapid route to publication and the opportunity to publish in a broadly distributed and highly visible global forum. The journal publishes high quality articles from all over the world and actively seeks submissions from countries with expanding sexual medicine communities. Sexual Medicine relies on the same expert panel of editors and reviewers as The Journal of Sexual Medicine and Sexual Medicine Reviews.
期刊最新文献
Benefits of movement-based Behaviors on improving erectile function in American men: a nationwide survey study. Definition of a European pre-vasectomy scoring system to identify patients at risk of vasectomy regret. Nutraceutical and low energy shockwave treatments improved sexual function recovery in a rat pelvic neurovascular injury model. Masked liking of pornography: implicit associations in men with compulsive sexual behavior. Impact of bladder management methods and other factors on sexual activity in women with chronic spinal cord injury/disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1