A Tablet-Based Technology for Objective Exercise Monitoring in Vestibular Rehabilitation: Mixed Methods Study.

Brooke N Klatt, Pedram Hovareshti, Lisa S Holt, Pamela M Dunlap, Chad Zalkin, Devendra Tolani, Susan L Whitney
{"title":"A Tablet-Based Technology for Objective Exercise Monitoring in Vestibular Rehabilitation: Mixed Methods Study.","authors":"Brooke N Klatt, Pedram Hovareshti, Lisa S Holt, Pamela M Dunlap, Chad Zalkin, Devendra Tolani, Susan L Whitney","doi":"10.2196/58713","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A low-cost home exercise system called VestAid has been developed to assist participants during vestibulo-ocular reflex gaze stabilization exercises outside of clinic visits. The system includes a tablet-based app for the participant and a web-based portal for the physical therapist that provides data to make judgments about exercise accuracy and performance.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility and acceptability of VestAid in a pilot study of 10 participants (mean age 45 [SD 19] years; 6 women) with various vestibular diagnoses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All participants completed twelve 30-second horizontal vestibulo-ocular reflex exercises in a seated position (6 \"easy\" and 6 \"hard\" exercises). The exercises differed by variations in the background color, pattern, and movement. One of the exercises was repeated to assess the test-retest reliability of the measure of gaze stability accuracy and head motion compliance during the exercise. Participants rated the difficulty of the exercises (0-10 where 0=easy, 10=difficult) and completed usability surveys.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants completed the VestAid session without adverse events. The responses from the usability survey demonstrate the acceptability of VestAid. The mean rating of the \"easy\" exercises was 2.7/10 (SD 1.9). The mean rating for the \"difficult\" exercises across participants was 4.8/10 (SD 2.1).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The consistency of the mean ratings of the participants with the exercise classifications (\"easy\" and \"difficult\") suggests that VestAid has clinical utility.</p>","PeriodicalId":36224,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies","volume":"12 ","pages":"e58713"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11813194/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/58713","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A low-cost home exercise system called VestAid has been developed to assist participants during vestibulo-ocular reflex gaze stabilization exercises outside of clinic visits. The system includes a tablet-based app for the participant and a web-based portal for the physical therapist that provides data to make judgments about exercise accuracy and performance.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility and acceptability of VestAid in a pilot study of 10 participants (mean age 45 [SD 19] years; 6 women) with various vestibular diagnoses.

Methods: All participants completed twelve 30-second horizontal vestibulo-ocular reflex exercises in a seated position (6 "easy" and 6 "hard" exercises). The exercises differed by variations in the background color, pattern, and movement. One of the exercises was repeated to assess the test-retest reliability of the measure of gaze stability accuracy and head motion compliance during the exercise. Participants rated the difficulty of the exercises (0-10 where 0=easy, 10=difficult) and completed usability surveys.

Results: Participants completed the VestAid session without adverse events. The responses from the usability survey demonstrate the acceptability of VestAid. The mean rating of the "easy" exercises was 2.7/10 (SD 1.9). The mean rating for the "difficult" exercises across participants was 4.8/10 (SD 2.1).

Conclusions: The consistency of the mean ratings of the participants with the exercise classifications ("easy" and "difficult") suggests that VestAid has clinical utility.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于平板电脑的前庭康复客观运动监测技术:混合方法研究。
背景:一种名为VestAid的低成本家庭锻炼系统已被开发出来,以帮助参与者在诊所访问之外进行前庭眼反射注视稳定练习。该系统为参与者提供了一个基于平板电脑的应用程序,为物理治疗师提供了一个基于网络的门户网站,该门户网站提供数据,以便对运动的准确性和表现做出判断。目的:本研究的目的是评估VestAid在10名参与者(平均年龄45岁[SD 19]岁;6名女性)有各种前庭诊断。方法:所有受试者在坐姿下完成12项30秒水平前庭-眼反射练习(6项“简单”和6项“困难”练习)。这些练习因背景颜色、图案和动作的不同而有所不同。其中一个练习被重复进行,以评估在练习过程中凝视稳定性、准确性和头部运动依从性测量的重测可靠性。参与者对练习的难度进行评分(0-10,0=简单,10=困难),并完成可用性调查。结果:参与者完成了VestAid疗程,没有出现不良事件。可用性调查的反馈证明了VestAid的可接受性。“简单”练习的平均评分为2.7/10 (SD 1.9)。参与者对“困难”练习的平均评分为4.8/10 (SD 2.1)。结论:参与者的平均评分与运动分类(“容易”和“困难”)的一致性表明VestAid具有临床实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Using Natural Language Prompts With AI Models for Low-Cost Assistive Software Design: Exploratory Comparative Evaluation. Technology-Driven Group Exercise Program Implementation in an Underserved Community: Multimethod Retrospective Evaluation Study. Smartphone-Supported Vestibular Rehabilitation in Individuals With Vestibular Dysfunction: Pilot Randomized Crossover Trial Assessing Functional Clinical Outcomes and Anxiety. A Therapeutic Conversational Agent (Solace) for Management of Chronic Pain: Acceptability and Usability Study. Patient-Perceived Factors Influencing Physical Activity Sensor Use in Stroke Prevention and Rehabilitation: Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies Using Thematic Synthesis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1