Qualitative assessment of combat-related injury patterns and injury prevention in Ukraine since the Russian invasion.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Bmj Military Health Pub Date : 2025-02-04 DOI:10.1136/military-2024-002863
Lynn Lieberman Lawry, V Mani, T E Hamm, M Janvrin, L Juman, J Korona-Bailey, J Maddox, O Berezyuk, A J Schoenfeld, T P Koehlmoos
{"title":"Qualitative assessment of combat-related injury patterns and injury prevention in Ukraine since the Russian invasion.","authors":"Lynn Lieberman Lawry, V Mani, T E Hamm, M Janvrin, L Juman, J Korona-Bailey, J Maddox, O Berezyuk, A J Schoenfeld, T P Koehlmoos","doi":"10.1136/military-2024-002863","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The ongoing invasion of Ukraine by the Russian Federation represents one of the largest ongoing conventional military engagements in the last 20 years. Since the start of the war, an estimated 210 000 Ukrainian soldiers have been injured or killed as a result of combat. This experience could help prognosticate the nature of large-scale combat operations for modern militaries. The aim of this study was to assess current patterns of injuries among military combatants in Ukraine and identify prevention and mitigation methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a series of key informant interviews during the ongoing conflict using an expanded version of the global trauma system evaluation tool. We focused the analysis on injury patterns and prevention of combat-related injuries.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We interviewed 36 participants from June 2023 to February 2024. Respondents described complex polytrauma as representing the injury norm, with prominent battle injuries, including blast wounds to the extremities, traumatic brain injuries and spinal cord trauma. The primary source of injury prevention on the battlefield remains combat body armour. Military commanders and the Ministry of Defence were identified as principal bodies for the authorising equipment and tactical changes. Most respondents stated there was no formal process for using data to inform injury prevention initiatives.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The current conflict in Ukraine is characterised by a high prevalence of devastating combat-related injury, with limited measures for battlefield injury prevention. We believe that the provision of additional protective gear could mitigate the severity of some combat-related injuries, while the creation of a trauma registry would provide greater insight into prevention, wounding patterns, treatment and outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":48485,"journal":{"name":"Bmj Military Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bmj Military Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/military-2024-002863","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The ongoing invasion of Ukraine by the Russian Federation represents one of the largest ongoing conventional military engagements in the last 20 years. Since the start of the war, an estimated 210 000 Ukrainian soldiers have been injured or killed as a result of combat. This experience could help prognosticate the nature of large-scale combat operations for modern militaries. The aim of this study was to assess current patterns of injuries among military combatants in Ukraine and identify prevention and mitigation methods.

Methods: We conducted a series of key informant interviews during the ongoing conflict using an expanded version of the global trauma system evaluation tool. We focused the analysis on injury patterns and prevention of combat-related injuries.

Results: We interviewed 36 participants from June 2023 to February 2024. Respondents described complex polytrauma as representing the injury norm, with prominent battle injuries, including blast wounds to the extremities, traumatic brain injuries and spinal cord trauma. The primary source of injury prevention on the battlefield remains combat body armour. Military commanders and the Ministry of Defence were identified as principal bodies for the authorising equipment and tactical changes. Most respondents stated there was no formal process for using data to inform injury prevention initiatives.

Conclusion: The current conflict in Ukraine is characterised by a high prevalence of devastating combat-related injury, with limited measures for battlefield injury prevention. We believe that the provision of additional protective gear could mitigate the severity of some combat-related injuries, while the creation of a trauma registry would provide greater insight into prevention, wounding patterns, treatment and outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对俄罗斯入侵以来乌克兰与战斗有关的伤害模式和伤害预防进行定性评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Bmj Military Health
Bmj Military Health MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
116
期刊最新文献
Using the capture-recapture method to ascertain the incidence of musculoskeletal injuries among elite military personnel. What is the medical requirement for a quick release system in a body armour vest? Burden and risk factors for plantar fasciopathy in the military population from 2006 to 2015: a retrospective cohort study. Qualitative assessment of combat-related injury patterns and injury prevention in Ukraine since the Russian invasion. Low physical activity levels of military police officers during day and night radio patrolling.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1