Using the capture-recapture method to ascertain the incidence of musculoskeletal injuries among elite military personnel.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Bmj Military Health Pub Date : 2025-02-06 DOI:10.1136/military-2024-002903
Mita Lovalekar, K A Keenan, D E Cruz, E J Steele, K Beals, B C Nindl
{"title":"Using the capture-recapture method to ascertain the incidence of musculoskeletal injuries among elite military personnel.","authors":"Mita Lovalekar, K A Keenan, D E Cruz, E J Steele, K Beals, B C Nindl","doi":"10.1136/military-2024-002903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Injury epidemiology research traditionally uses a single musculoskeletal injury (MSI) data source, such as injury self-report (ISR) or medical record-review (MRR). MSI data obtained from ISR may be incomplete due to recall issues, and MRR data may be incomplete if medical attention was not sought, which is especially problematic in military populations. The objective of this analysis was to determine the ascertainment-corrected incidence of MSI among Special Forces (SF) military personnel using a novel statistical technique, capture-recapture (CRC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This descriptive cross-sectional study used two sources of MSI data (ISR and MRR) collected at SF military installations. The CRC analysis, using the Chapman modification of the Lincoln-Petersen estimator, was conducted to assess the completeness of MSI data and to estimate the 1-year ascertainment-corrected cumulative MSI incidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MSI data were available for 335 SF personnel (age: 28.9±6.2 years). At the time the study was conducted, only men could qualify as SF personnel. The percentage of participants identified as injured were 31.3% in the ISR, 26.6% in the MRR and 14.0% in both sources. The CRC estimate of the number of injured participants was 197.8 (95% CI 169.7, 225.8), with a CRC estimated 1 year cumulative incidence of 59.0% (95% CI 50.7%, 67.4%). Overall ascertainment was good (74.3%), but was relatively lower for spine MSI (49.0%) as compared with lower (73.7%) or upper (72.7%) extremity MSI. Ascertainment was highest for fractures (79.5%) versus strain (60.0%) or sprain (68.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This was the first study to apply the CRC technique to estimate MSIs among SF personnel, who are at a very high risk of sustaining MSIs. Completeness of the MSI data varied by the MSI anatomic location and type. Further research into the application of the CRC technique in military populations is warranted, to provide an accurate estimate of the MSI burden.</p>","PeriodicalId":48485,"journal":{"name":"Bmj Military Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bmj Military Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/military-2024-002903","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Injury epidemiology research traditionally uses a single musculoskeletal injury (MSI) data source, such as injury self-report (ISR) or medical record-review (MRR). MSI data obtained from ISR may be incomplete due to recall issues, and MRR data may be incomplete if medical attention was not sought, which is especially problematic in military populations. The objective of this analysis was to determine the ascertainment-corrected incidence of MSI among Special Forces (SF) military personnel using a novel statistical technique, capture-recapture (CRC).

Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional study used two sources of MSI data (ISR and MRR) collected at SF military installations. The CRC analysis, using the Chapman modification of the Lincoln-Petersen estimator, was conducted to assess the completeness of MSI data and to estimate the 1-year ascertainment-corrected cumulative MSI incidence.

Results: MSI data were available for 335 SF personnel (age: 28.9±6.2 years). At the time the study was conducted, only men could qualify as SF personnel. The percentage of participants identified as injured were 31.3% in the ISR, 26.6% in the MRR and 14.0% in both sources. The CRC estimate of the number of injured participants was 197.8 (95% CI 169.7, 225.8), with a CRC estimated 1 year cumulative incidence of 59.0% (95% CI 50.7%, 67.4%). Overall ascertainment was good (74.3%), but was relatively lower for spine MSI (49.0%) as compared with lower (73.7%) or upper (72.7%) extremity MSI. Ascertainment was highest for fractures (79.5%) versus strain (60.0%) or sprain (68.3%).

Conclusions: This was the first study to apply the CRC technique to estimate MSIs among SF personnel, who are at a very high risk of sustaining MSIs. Completeness of the MSI data varied by the MSI anatomic location and type. Further research into the application of the CRC technique in military populations is warranted, to provide an accurate estimate of the MSI burden.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Bmj Military Health
Bmj Military Health MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
116
期刊最新文献
Using the capture-recapture method to ascertain the incidence of musculoskeletal injuries among elite military personnel. What is the medical requirement for a quick release system in a body armour vest? Burden and risk factors for plantar fasciopathy in the military population from 2006 to 2015: a retrospective cohort study. Qualitative assessment of combat-related injury patterns and injury prevention in Ukraine since the Russian invasion. Low physical activity levels of military police officers during day and night radio patrolling.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1