Association between different modalities of opioid use disorder-related care delivery and opioid use disorder-related patient outcomes: A retrospective cohort study

Q1 Psychology Addictive Behaviors Reports Pub Date : 2025-02-02 DOI:10.1016/j.abrep.2025.100588

Nahiyan Bin Noor , George Pro , Mahip Acharya , Hari Eswaran , Corey J. Hayes

{"title":"Association between different modalities of opioid use disorder-related care delivery and opioid use disorder-related patient outcomes: A retrospective cohort study","authors":"Nahiyan Bin Noor , George Pro , Mahip Acharya , Hari Eswaran , Corey J. Hayes","doi":"10.1016/j.abrep.2025.100588","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study assessed the impact of different modalities of delivery of opioid use disorder (OUD)-related care on several patient outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study was conducted among patients newly diagnosed with OUD and receiving OUD-related care between March 2020 and March 2022, using data from Epic Cosmos. We examined the association between the most common modality of OUD-related care delivery (audio-only vs. audiovisual vs. in-person) and the number of emergency department (ED) visits for any overdose and opioid-specific overdose and receipt of medication treatment for OUD (MOUD; primary). We also examined the association between the most common modality of OUD-related care delivery and all-cause ED visits, hospitalizations, and psychiatric-related hospitalizations (secondary outcomes). We estimated logistic regression for receipt of MOUD and negative binomial for all other outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Most patients primarily received OUD-related care in person (87.6 %, n = 159,351), followed by audiovisual visits (11.3 %, n = 20,629) and audio-only visits (1.1 %, n = 1,869). The mean (SD) ages for these groups were 51.7 (15.9), 47.1 (15.0), and 51.1 (15.8) years, respectively. Compared to receiving OUD-related care primarily in-person, receiving care predominantly through audio-only or audiovisual visits was associated with a modest decrease in number of all-cause ED visits. Receiving OUD-related care primarily through audiovisual visits, compared to in-person care, was associated with a slight increase in the odds of receiving MOUD. No statistically significant differences were found between the care delivery modalities and the other outcomes we examined.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Telehealth, delivered via audio-only or audiovisual methods, appears to provide care of similar quality to in-person OUD care and may modestly reduce OUD-related ED visits while slightly increasing MOUD receipt. These findings support continued delivery of OUD-related care through telehealth and continuation of COVID-19-related policies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38040,"journal":{"name":"Addictive Behaviors Reports","volume":"21 ","pages":"Article 100588"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addictive Behaviors Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352853225000069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This study assessed the impact of different modalities of delivery of opioid use disorder (OUD)-related care on several patient outcomes.

Methods

This study was conducted among patients newly diagnosed with OUD and receiving OUD-related care between March 2020 and March 2022, using data from Epic Cosmos. We examined the association between the most common modality of OUD-related care delivery (audio-only vs. audiovisual vs. in-person) and the number of emergency department (ED) visits for any overdose and opioid-specific overdose and receipt of medication treatment for OUD (MOUD; primary). We also examined the association between the most common modality of OUD-related care delivery and all-cause ED visits, hospitalizations, and psychiatric-related hospitalizations (secondary outcomes). We estimated logistic regression for receipt of MOUD and negative binomial for all other outcomes.

Results

Most patients primarily received OUD-related care in person (87.6 %, n = 159,351), followed by audiovisual visits (11.3 %, n = 20,629) and audio-only visits (1.1 %, n = 1,869). The mean (SD) ages for these groups were 51.7 (15.9), 47.1 (15.0), and 51.1 (15.8) years, respectively. Compared to receiving OUD-related care primarily in-person, receiving care predominantly through audio-only or audiovisual visits was associated with a modest decrease in number of all-cause ED visits. Receiving OUD-related care primarily through audiovisual visits, compared to in-person care, was associated with a slight increase in the odds of receiving MOUD. No statistically significant differences were found between the care delivery modalities and the other outcomes we examined.

Conclusion

Telehealth, delivered via audio-only or audiovisual methods, appears to provide care of similar quality to in-person OUD care and may modestly reduce OUD-related ED visits while slightly increasing MOUD receipt. These findings support continued delivery of OUD-related care through telehealth and continuation of COVID-19-related policies.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Addictive Behaviors Reports Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health

CiteScore

6.80

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

71 days

期刊介绍： Addictive Behaviors Reports is an open-access and peer reviewed online-only journal offering an interdisciplinary forum for the publication of research in addictive behaviors. The journal accepts submissions that are scientifically sound on all forms of addictive behavior (alcohol, drugs, gambling, Internet, nicotine and technology) with a primary focus on behavioral and psychosocial research. The emphasis of the journal is primarily empirical. That is, sound experimental design combined with valid, reliable assessment and evaluation procedures are a requisite for acceptance. We are particularly interested in ''non-traditional'', innovative and empirically oriented research such as negative/null data papers, replication studies, case reports on novel treatments, and cross-cultural research. Studies that might encourage new lines of inquiry as well as scholarly commentaries on topical issues, systematic reviews, and mini reviews are also very much encouraged. We also welcome multimedia submissions that incorporate video or audio components to better display methodology or findings.