Oncologic significance of the lateral margin in buccal cancer

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Oral oncology Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-07 DOI:10.1016/j.oraloncology.2025.107212
Muthuswamy Dhiwakar , Sneha Kamalakkannan , Deeksha Dhiwakar , Nithyanand Chidambaranathan , Rajeshwari Muthusamy , Pirabu Sakthivel , Firoz Rajan
{"title":"Oncologic significance of the lateral margin in buccal cancer","authors":"Muthuswamy Dhiwakar ,&nbsp;Sneha Kamalakkannan ,&nbsp;Deeksha Dhiwakar ,&nbsp;Nithyanand Chidambaranathan ,&nbsp;Rajeshwari Muthusamy ,&nbsp;Pirabu Sakthivel ,&nbsp;Firoz Rajan","doi":"10.1016/j.oraloncology.2025.107212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the specific oncologic significance of the lateral margin (LM)- the marginal plane closest to skin- in resected buccal cancer.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>216 consecutive, treatment naïve patients undergoing primary surgery for buccal cancer were included. Cheek skin was resected based on clinical features of skin or subcutaneous involvement or proximity to oral commissure. Main outcomes were 1) frequency of LM ≤1 mm in relation to other (anterior, posterior, superior and inferior) margins and 2) association of LM ≤1 mm with LRFS and DFS. Secondary outcomes were rate of LM ≤1 mm and size of LM with and without skin resection.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 67 (31 %) patients had one or more margin ≤1 mm, of which LM comprised 36 (54 %). LM ≤1 mm was disproportionately highest among the five marginal planes (p &lt; 0.001) and was independently associated with LRFS and DFS. Both associations held in sensitivity analysis wherein patients with co-existent margin ≤1 mm at any of the other four marginal planes underwent group-wise exclusion. Skin resection and preservation was performed in 61 (28 %) and 155 (72 %) patients respectively. The latter had a higher rate of LM ≤1 mm and smaller LM size (both p &lt; 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This cohort study of buccal cancer shows that LM is most prone for ≤1 mm size. LM ≤1 mm predicts worse LRFS and DFS independent of other margins and risk factors. As skin preservation is associated with a higher rate of LM ≤1 mm, surgeons must lower the threshold to encompass more tissue laterally, including skin where appropriate.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19716,"journal":{"name":"Oral oncology","volume":"162 ","pages":"Article 107212"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1368837525000417","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the specific oncologic significance of the lateral margin (LM)- the marginal plane closest to skin- in resected buccal cancer.

Materials and methods

216 consecutive, treatment naïve patients undergoing primary surgery for buccal cancer were included. Cheek skin was resected based on clinical features of skin or subcutaneous involvement or proximity to oral commissure. Main outcomes were 1) frequency of LM ≤1 mm in relation to other (anterior, posterior, superior and inferior) margins and 2) association of LM ≤1 mm with LRFS and DFS. Secondary outcomes were rate of LM ≤1 mm and size of LM with and without skin resection.

Results

A total of 67 (31 %) patients had one or more margin ≤1 mm, of which LM comprised 36 (54 %). LM ≤1 mm was disproportionately highest among the five marginal planes (p < 0.001) and was independently associated with LRFS and DFS. Both associations held in sensitivity analysis wherein patients with co-existent margin ≤1 mm at any of the other four marginal planes underwent group-wise exclusion. Skin resection and preservation was performed in 61 (28 %) and 155 (72 %) patients respectively. The latter had a higher rate of LM ≤1 mm and smaller LM size (both p < 0.05).

Conclusions

This cohort study of buccal cancer shows that LM is most prone for ≤1 mm size. LM ≤1 mm predicts worse LRFS and DFS independent of other margins and risk factors. As skin preservation is associated with a higher rate of LM ≤1 mm, surgeons must lower the threshold to encompass more tissue laterally, including skin where appropriate.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
颊癌侧缘的肿瘤学意义
目的探讨口腔癌切除后最接近皮肤的侧缘(LM)的特异性肿瘤学意义。材料与方法:216例连续接受治疗naïve的口腔癌原发手术患者。根据皮肤或皮下受累或接近口腔连接的临床特征切除脸颊皮肤。主要结果为:1)LM≤1mm相对于其他(前、后、上、下)切缘的频率;2)LM≤1mm与LRFS和DFS的相关性。次要结果为LM≤1mm的发生率以及切除和不切除皮肤后LM的大小。结果67例(31%)患者有一个或多个切缘≤1mm,其中LM 36例(54%)。LM≤1 mm在5个边缘平面中不成比例地最高(p <;0.001),且与LRFS和DFS独立相关。两种关联在敏感性分析中成立,在其他四个边缘平面中任何一个边缘共存≤1mm的患者进行分组排除。分别有61例(28%)和155例(72%)患者行皮肤切除和保存。后者的LM≤1 mm率较高,且LM尺寸较小(p <;0.05)。结论口腔癌的队列研究显示,≤1mm的尺寸最容易发生LM。LM≤1mm预示较差的LRFS和DFS与其他边缘和危险因素无关。由于皮肤保存与LM≤1mm的较高发生率相关,外科医生必须降低阈值,以覆盖更多的外侧组织,包括适当的皮肤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Oral oncology
Oral oncology 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
10.40%
发文量
505
审稿时长
20 days
期刊介绍: Oral Oncology is an international interdisciplinary journal which publishes high quality original research, clinical trials and review articles, editorials, and commentaries relating to the etiopathogenesis, epidemiology, prevention, clinical features, diagnosis, treatment and management of patients with neoplasms in the head and neck. Oral Oncology is of interest to head and neck surgeons, radiation and medical oncologists, maxillo-facial surgeons, oto-rhino-laryngologists, plastic surgeons, pathologists, scientists, oral medical specialists, special care dentists, dental care professionals, general dental practitioners, public health physicians, palliative care physicians, nurses, radiologists, radiographers, dieticians, occupational therapists, speech and language therapists, nutritionists, clinical and health psychologists and counselors, professionals in end of life care, as well as others interested in these fields.
期刊最新文献
Artificial Intelligence–Assisted reflectance confocal microscopy for Real-Time intraoperative margin assessment in oral squamous cell carcinoma Defining platinum-ineligible head and neck cancer patients from administrative data Bidirectional trigeminal perineural spread of adenoid cystic carcinoma via the pterygopalatine fossa Clinical efficacy of chemopreventive agents in oral cancer and oral potentially malignant disorders: A systematic review Diagnostic value of MRI-based iENE assessment for predicting major and minor extranodal extension in oral tongue carcinoma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1