Mieke Soens , Jintanat Ananworanich , Bryony Hicks , Kathryn Jean Lucas , Jose Cardona , Lawrence Sher , Greg Livermore , Kristi Schaefers , Carole Henry , Angela Choi , Andrei Avanesov , Ren Chen , Evelyn Du , Alicia Pucci , Rituparna Das , Jacqueline Miller , Raffael Nachbagauer
{"title":"A phase 3 randomized safety and immunogenicity trial of mRNA-1010 seasonal influenza vaccine in adults","authors":"Mieke Soens , Jintanat Ananworanich , Bryony Hicks , Kathryn Jean Lucas , Jose Cardona , Lawrence Sher , Greg Livermore , Kristi Schaefers , Carole Henry , Angela Choi , Andrei Avanesov , Ren Chen , Evelyn Du , Alicia Pucci , Rituparna Das , Jacqueline Miller , Raffael Nachbagauer","doi":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.126847","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Messenger RNA (mRNA)-based influenza vaccines have the potential to improve upon limitations of current vaccine approaches to seasonal influenza.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Here we report findings on the primary and secondary objectives of the safety, reactogenicity, and humoral immunogenicity of the quadrivalent mRNA vaccine, mRNA-1010, versus licensed standard-dose and high-dose quadrivalent influenza vaccines from a three-part, phase 3 clinical trial in adults aged ≥18 years (Part A), 18–64 years (Part B), and ≥ 65 years (Part C) (<span><span>NCT05827978</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A single 50-μg dose of mRNA-1010 elicited hemagglutination inhibition titers against vaccine-matched strains that were statistically noninferior and superior to licensed standard-dose and high-dose egg-based quadrivalent vaccine comparators. Solicited adverse reactions were more frequent with receipt of mRNA-1010; adverse reactions were lower in frequency and severity among adults aged ≥65 years than younger adults. No safety concerns were identified.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>These findings support the potential benefit of mRNA-1010 as a seasonal influenza vaccine.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23491,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine","volume":"50 ","pages":"Article 126847"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vaccine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X25001446","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Messenger RNA (mRNA)-based influenza vaccines have the potential to improve upon limitations of current vaccine approaches to seasonal influenza.
Methods
Here we report findings on the primary and secondary objectives of the safety, reactogenicity, and humoral immunogenicity of the quadrivalent mRNA vaccine, mRNA-1010, versus licensed standard-dose and high-dose quadrivalent influenza vaccines from a three-part, phase 3 clinical trial in adults aged ≥18 years (Part A), 18–64 years (Part B), and ≥ 65 years (Part C) (NCT05827978).
Results
A single 50-μg dose of mRNA-1010 elicited hemagglutination inhibition titers against vaccine-matched strains that were statistically noninferior and superior to licensed standard-dose and high-dose egg-based quadrivalent vaccine comparators. Solicited adverse reactions were more frequent with receipt of mRNA-1010; adverse reactions were lower in frequency and severity among adults aged ≥65 years than younger adults. No safety concerns were identified.
Conclusions
These findings support the potential benefit of mRNA-1010 as a seasonal influenza vaccine.
期刊介绍:
Vaccine is unique in publishing the highest quality science across all disciplines relevant to the field of vaccinology - all original article submissions across basic and clinical research, vaccine manufacturing, history, public policy, behavioral science and ethics, social sciences, safety, and many other related areas are welcomed. The submission categories as given in the Guide for Authors indicate where we receive the most papers. Papers outside these major areas are also welcome and authors are encouraged to contact us with specific questions.