Best practices for reducing pain associated with intrauterine device placement

IF 8.4 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY American journal of obstetrics and gynecology Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-03 DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2025.01.039
Lisa L. Bayer MD, MPH, FACOG , Samir Ahuja MD, FACOG , Rebecca H. Allen MD, MPH, FACOG , Melanie A. Gold DO, DMQ, DABMA, FAAP , Jeffrey P. Levine MD, MPH , Lynn L. Ngo MD, MPH, FACOG , Sheila Mody MD, MPH, FACOG
{"title":"Best practices for reducing pain associated with intrauterine device placement","authors":"Lisa L. Bayer MD, MPH, FACOG ,&nbsp;Samir Ahuja MD, FACOG ,&nbsp;Rebecca H. Allen MD, MPH, FACOG ,&nbsp;Melanie A. Gold DO, DMQ, DABMA, FAAP ,&nbsp;Jeffrey P. Levine MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Lynn L. Ngo MD, MPH, FACOG ,&nbsp;Sheila Mody MD, MPH, FACOG","doi":"10.1016/j.ajog.2025.01.039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Intrauterine devices are highly effective, long-acting, reversible forms of contraception. Despite their benefits, limited uptake persists, particularly among underserved populations, adolescents, and young adults. While most intrauterine device placement procedures are uncomplicated, pain is commonly reported, with more severe pain reported in certain groups. No current standard of care has been established specifically to manage pain with intrauterine device placement, resulting in wide variation in clinical practice. This article aims to provide practical, evidence-based, and expert-informed guidelines for managing pain during intrauterine device placement. The authors (a group of board-certified obstetrician-gynecologists, pediatricians, and a family physician) conducted a virtual expert meeting to develop consensus-based recommendations for pain management. The meeting covered environmental considerations, nonpharmacological, and pharmacological options. Key strategies include using a person-centered care model that focuses on patient values, needs, and preferences to promote shared decision-making around pain relief. Clinicians should assist patients in setting realistic expectations, including a discussion of the placement procedure, anticipated pain, and all options for pain relief, to allow for a comprehensive informed consent process. Nonpharmacological interventions, such as the use of therapeutic language and comforting environmental, complementary and integrative, and mind-body elements, are recommended to reduce patient anxiety and discomfort. In terms of pharmacological options, clinicians may offer pre-procedural–specific nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (eg, naproxen and ketorolac) and anxiolytics to patients with significant anxiety, as well as intraprocedural application of topical anesthesia and paracervical or intracervical blocks. Finally, additional techniques, such as using appropriately sized instruments and ensuring gradual and gentle procedural steps, can also help enhance patient comfort during insertion. These expert guidelines emphasize the importance of personalized, trauma-informed, and evidence-based care, prioritizing patient autonomy and preferences to facilitate a safe and acceptable insertion experience. They are critical to reducing barriers to intrauterine device uptake and improving overall patient outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7574,"journal":{"name":"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology","volume":"232 5","pages":"Pages 409-421"},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002937825000729","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intrauterine devices are highly effective, long-acting, reversible forms of contraception. Despite their benefits, limited uptake persists, particularly among underserved populations, adolescents, and young adults. While most intrauterine device placement procedures are uncomplicated, pain is commonly reported, with more severe pain reported in certain groups. No current standard of care has been established specifically to manage pain with intrauterine device placement, resulting in wide variation in clinical practice. This article aims to provide practical, evidence-based, and expert-informed guidelines for managing pain during intrauterine device placement. The authors (a group of board-certified obstetrician-gynecologists, pediatricians, and a family physician) conducted a virtual expert meeting to develop consensus-based recommendations for pain management. The meeting covered environmental considerations, nonpharmacological, and pharmacological options. Key strategies include using a person-centered care model that focuses on patient values, needs, and preferences to promote shared decision-making around pain relief. Clinicians should assist patients in setting realistic expectations, including a discussion of the placement procedure, anticipated pain, and all options for pain relief, to allow for a comprehensive informed consent process. Nonpharmacological interventions, such as the use of therapeutic language and comforting environmental, complementary and integrative, and mind-body elements, are recommended to reduce patient anxiety and discomfort. In terms of pharmacological options, clinicians may offer pre-procedural–specific nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (eg, naproxen and ketorolac) and anxiolytics to patients with significant anxiety, as well as intraprocedural application of topical anesthesia and paracervical or intracervical blocks. Finally, additional techniques, such as using appropriately sized instruments and ensuring gradual and gentle procedural steps, can also help enhance patient comfort during insertion. These expert guidelines emphasize the importance of personalized, trauma-informed, and evidence-based care, prioritizing patient autonomy and preferences to facilitate a safe and acceptable insertion experience. They are critical to reducing barriers to intrauterine device uptake and improving overall patient outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
减少宫内节育器放置相关疼痛的最佳实践。
宫内节育器是一种高效、长效、可逆的避孕方式。尽管它们有好处,但吸收仍然有限,特别是在服务不足的人群、青少年和年轻人中。虽然大多数宫内节育器放置程序并不复杂,但通常报告疼痛,某些组报告更严重的疼痛。目前还没有专门针对宫内节育器放置疼痛的护理标准,导致临床实践中存在很大差异。本文旨在为宫内节育器放置过程中的疼痛管理提供实用、循证和专家指导。作者(一组委员会认证的妇产科医生,儿科医生和家庭医生)进行了一次虚拟专家会议,以制定基于共识的疼痛管理建议。会议涵盖了环境考虑、非药物和药物选择。关键策略包括使用以人为中心的护理模式,关注患者的价值、需求和偏好,以促进围绕疼痛缓解的共同决策。临床医生应帮助患者设定切合实际的期望,包括讨论放置程序、预期疼痛和缓解疼痛的所有选择,以允许全面的知情同意过程。非药物干预,如使用治疗语言和舒适的环境,互补和综合,以及身心因素,建议减少患者的焦虑和不适。在药物选择方面,临床医生可对有明显焦虑的患者提供术前特异性非甾体抗炎药(如萘普生和酮罗拉酸)和抗焦虑药,以及术中应用表面麻醉和颈旁或颈内阻滞。最后,额外的技术,如使用适当大小的器械和确保渐进和温和的操作步骤,也可以帮助提高患者在插入过程中的舒适度。这些专家指南强调个性化、创伤知情和循证护理的重要性,优先考虑患者的自主权和偏好,以促进安全和可接受的插入体验。它们对于减少宫内节育器摄取障碍和改善患者整体预后至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
2237
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, known as "The Gray Journal," covers the entire spectrum of Obstetrics and Gynecology. It aims to publish original research (clinical and translational), reviews, opinions, video clips, podcasts, and interviews that contribute to understanding health and disease and have the potential to impact the practice of women's healthcare. Focus Areas: Diagnosis, Treatment, Prediction, and Prevention: The journal focuses on research related to the diagnosis, treatment, prediction, and prevention of obstetrical and gynecological disorders. Biology of Reproduction: AJOG publishes work on the biology of reproduction, including studies on reproductive physiology and mechanisms of obstetrical and gynecological diseases. Content Types: Original Research: Clinical and translational research articles. Reviews: Comprehensive reviews providing insights into various aspects of obstetrics and gynecology. Opinions: Perspectives and opinions on important topics in the field. Multimedia Content: Video clips, podcasts, and interviews. Peer Review Process: All submissions undergo a rigorous peer review process to ensure quality and relevance to the field of obstetrics and gynecology.
期刊最新文献
The association between postpartum aspirin use and NT-proBNP levels as a marker for maternal cardiac health: a randomized controlled trial Toward a broader understanding of low molecular weight heparin in early-onset intrauterine growth restriction Methodological considerations and future directions for low molecular weight heparin in fetal growth restriction Refining blood pressure control in pregnant individuals with diabetes: addressing key methodological gaps Methodological considerations and prospective pathways in researching diabetes and hypertension in pregnancy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1