Bilateral Internal Mammary Artery in Off-Pump Coronary Artery Grafting in Diabetic Patients

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS American Journal of Cardiology Pub Date : 2025-02-03 DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.01.030
Giuseppe Tavilla MD, PhD, Md Anamul Islam PhD, Amber Malhotra MD, Daniel Lincoln Beckles MD, PhD
{"title":"Bilateral Internal Mammary Artery in Off-Pump Coronary Artery Grafting in Diabetic Patients","authors":"Giuseppe Tavilla MD, PhD,&nbsp;Md Anamul Islam PhD,&nbsp;Amber Malhotra MD,&nbsp;Daniel Lincoln Beckles MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.01.030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Bilateral internal mammary artery (BIMA) grafts utilization in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for diabetic patients has been limited due to concerns regarding postoperative morbidity, especially sternal wound infections (SWI). However, outcomes for BIMA grafting combined with off-pump CABG (OPCAB) in diabetic patients remain underexplored. This study aimed to compare BIMA and single internal mammary artery (SIMA) grafting outcomes in diabetic OPCAB patients. A single-center retrospective analysis was conducted on diabetes patients who underwent OPCAB with BIMA or SIMA grafts from January 2020 to December 2023. Baseline characteristics, including STS risk scores, were matched between cohorts using stabilized inverse probability treatment weighting (sIPTW). The study included 412 diabetic patients: 207 (50.2%) received BIMA and 205 (49.8%) received SIMA grafts. After sIPTW matching, 30-day mortality was identical (1.4%, p = 0.40), with comparable rates of deep (0.9% vs 0.8%, p = 0.89) and superficial sternal wound infections (4% vs 1.8%, p = 0.19). Composite complication rates (40% vs 47%; p = 0.13) and individual components such as renal injury, reoperation bleeding, stroke, and atrial fibrillation were similar between groups. Rates of overall readmission and cardiac readmission, discharge-to-home versus acute care facilities, and hospital stays longer than 7 days were comparable. Notably, BIMA showed significantly lower rates of blood transfusion (31% vs 40%; p = 0.038) and prolonged ventilation (9% vs 16%; p = 0.033) than SIMA group. In conclusion, our findings suggest that BIMA grafting combined with OPCAB may be safely used in diabetic patients despite historical concern about wound healing complications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7705,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Cardiology","volume":"243 ","pages":"Pages 34-39"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000291492500058X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bilateral internal mammary artery (BIMA) grafts utilization in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for diabetic patients has been limited due to concerns regarding postoperative morbidity, especially sternal wound infections (SWI). However, outcomes for BIMA grafting combined with off-pump CABG (OPCAB) in diabetic patients remain underexplored. This study aimed to compare BIMA and single internal mammary artery (SIMA) grafting outcomes in diabetic OPCAB patients. A single-center retrospective analysis was conducted on diabetes patients who underwent OPCAB with BIMA or SIMA grafts from January 2020 to December 2023. Baseline characteristics, including STS risk scores, were matched between cohorts using stabilized inverse probability treatment weighting (sIPTW). The study included 412 diabetic patients: 207 (50.2%) received BIMA and 205 (49.8%) received SIMA grafts. After sIPTW matching, 30-day mortality was identical (1.4%, p = 0.40), with comparable rates of deep (0.9% vs 0.8%, p = 0.89) and superficial sternal wound infections (4% vs 1.8%, p = 0.19). Composite complication rates (40% vs 47%; p = 0.13) and individual components such as renal injury, reoperation bleeding, stroke, and atrial fibrillation were similar between groups. Rates of overall readmission and cardiac readmission, discharge-to-home versus acute care facilities, and hospital stays longer than 7 days were comparable. Notably, BIMA showed significantly lower rates of blood transfusion (31% vs 40%; p = 0.038) and prolonged ventilation (9% vs 16%; p = 0.033) than SIMA group. In conclusion, our findings suggest that BIMA grafting combined with OPCAB may be safely used in diabetic patients despite historical concern about wound healing complications.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Cardiology
American Journal of Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
3.60%
发文量
698
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Published 24 times a year, The American Journal of Cardiology® is an independent journal designed for cardiovascular disease specialists and internists with a subspecialty in cardiology throughout the world. AJC is an independent, scientific, peer-reviewed journal of original articles that focus on the practical, clinical approach to the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease. AJC has one of the fastest acceptance to publication times in Cardiology. Features report on systemic hypertension, methodology, drugs, pacing, arrhythmia, preventive cardiology, congestive heart failure, valvular heart disease, congenital heart disease, and cardiomyopathy. Also included are editorials, readers'' comments, and symposia.
期刊最新文献
Prospective Comparison of Temporal Myocardial Function in Men versus Women After Anterior ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction with Timely Reperfusion. The Relationship Between Syncope and Cardiac Index in Acute Pulmonary Embolism. Editorial Board Contents Adequacy of Loop Diuretic Dosing in Treatment of Acute Heart Failure: Insights from the BAN-ADHF Diuretic Resistance Risk Score.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1