A logistic regression model to predict long-term survival for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer patients with upfront surgery.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Cancer Imaging Pub Date : 2025-02-05 DOI:10.1186/s40644-025-00830-y
Jin-Can Huang, Shao-Cheng Lyu, Bing Pan, Han-Xuan Wang, You-Wei Ma, Tao Jiang, Qiang He, Ren Lang
{"title":"A logistic regression model to predict long-term survival for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer patients with upfront surgery.","authors":"Jin-Can Huang, Shao-Cheng Lyu, Bing Pan, Han-Xuan Wang, You-Wei Ma, Tao Jiang, Qiang He, Ren Lang","doi":"10.1186/s40644-025-00830-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The machine learning model, which has been widely applied in prognosis assessment, can comprehensively evaluate patient status for accurate prognosis classification. There still has been a debate about which predictive strategy is better in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC). In the present study, we establish a logistic regression model, aiming to predict long-term survival and identify related prognostic factors in patients with BRPC who underwent upfront surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medical records of patients with BRPC who underwent upfront surgery with portal vein resection and reconstruction from Jan. 2011 to Dec. 2020 were reviewed. Based on postoperative overall survival (OS), patients were divided into the short-term group (≤ 2 years) and the long-term group (> 2 years). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to compare perioperative variables and long-term prognoses between groups to identify related independent prognostic factors. All patients are randomly divided into the training set and the validation set at a 7:3 ratio. The logistic regression model was established and evaluated for accuracy through the above variables in the training set and the validation set, respectively, and was visualized by Nomograms. Meanwhile, the model was further verified and compared for accuracy, the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC), and calibration analysis. Then, we plotted and sorted perioperative variables by SHAP value to identify the most important variables. The first 4 most important variables were compared with the above independent prognostic factors. Finally, other models including support vector machines (SVM), random forest, decision tree, and XGBoost were also constructed using the above 4 variables. 10-fold stratified cross-validation and the AUC of ROC were performed to compare accuracy between models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>104 patients were enrolled in the study, and the median OS was 15.5 months, the 0.5-, 1-, and 2- years OS were 81.7%, 57.7%, and 30.8%, respectively. In the long-term group (n = 32) and short-term group (n = 72), the overall median survival time and the 1-, 2-, 3- years overall survival were 38 months, 100%, 100%, 61.3% and 10 months, 38.9%, 0%, 0%, respectively. 4 variables, including age, vascular invasion length, vascular morphological malformation, and local lymphadenopathy were confirmed as independent risk factors between the two groups following univariate and multivariate analysis. The AUC between the training set (n = 72) and the validation set (n = 32) were 0.881 and 0.875. SHAP value showed that the above variables were the first 4 most important. The AUC following 10-fold stratified cross-validation in the logistic regression (0.864) is better than SVM (0.693), random forest (0.789), decision tree (0.790), and XGBoost (0.726).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Age, vascular invasion length, vascular morphological malformation, and local lymphadenopathy were independent risk factors for long-term survival of BRPC patients with upfront surgery. The logistic regression model plays a predictive role in long-term survival and may further assist surgeons in deciding the treatment option for BRPC patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":9548,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Imaging","volume":"25 1","pages":"10"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11800425/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40644-025-00830-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The machine learning model, which has been widely applied in prognosis assessment, can comprehensively evaluate patient status for accurate prognosis classification. There still has been a debate about which predictive strategy is better in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC). In the present study, we establish a logistic regression model, aiming to predict long-term survival and identify related prognostic factors in patients with BRPC who underwent upfront surgery.

Methods: Medical records of patients with BRPC who underwent upfront surgery with portal vein resection and reconstruction from Jan. 2011 to Dec. 2020 were reviewed. Based on postoperative overall survival (OS), patients were divided into the short-term group (≤ 2 years) and the long-term group (> 2 years). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to compare perioperative variables and long-term prognoses between groups to identify related independent prognostic factors. All patients are randomly divided into the training set and the validation set at a 7:3 ratio. The logistic regression model was established and evaluated for accuracy through the above variables in the training set and the validation set, respectively, and was visualized by Nomograms. Meanwhile, the model was further verified and compared for accuracy, the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC), and calibration analysis. Then, we plotted and sorted perioperative variables by SHAP value to identify the most important variables. The first 4 most important variables were compared with the above independent prognostic factors. Finally, other models including support vector machines (SVM), random forest, decision tree, and XGBoost were also constructed using the above 4 variables. 10-fold stratified cross-validation and the AUC of ROC were performed to compare accuracy between models.

Results: 104 patients were enrolled in the study, and the median OS was 15.5 months, the 0.5-, 1-, and 2- years OS were 81.7%, 57.7%, and 30.8%, respectively. In the long-term group (n = 32) and short-term group (n = 72), the overall median survival time and the 1-, 2-, 3- years overall survival were 38 months, 100%, 100%, 61.3% and 10 months, 38.9%, 0%, 0%, respectively. 4 variables, including age, vascular invasion length, vascular morphological malformation, and local lymphadenopathy were confirmed as independent risk factors between the two groups following univariate and multivariate analysis. The AUC between the training set (n = 72) and the validation set (n = 32) were 0.881 and 0.875. SHAP value showed that the above variables were the first 4 most important. The AUC following 10-fold stratified cross-validation in the logistic regression (0.864) is better than SVM (0.693), random forest (0.789), decision tree (0.790), and XGBoost (0.726).

Conclusion: Age, vascular invasion length, vascular morphological malformation, and local lymphadenopathy were independent risk factors for long-term survival of BRPC patients with upfront surgery. The logistic regression model plays a predictive role in long-term survival and may further assist surgeons in deciding the treatment option for BRPC patients.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预测边缘性可切除胰腺癌术前患者长期生存的logistic回归模型。
背景:机器学习模型可以综合评价患者状态,进行准确的预后分类,在预后评估中得到了广泛的应用。对于边缘性可切除胰腺癌(BRPC)患者,哪种预测策略更好仍有争议。在本研究中,我们建立了一个逻辑回归模型,旨在预测BRPC术前患者的长期生存和确定相关预后因素。方法:回顾2011年1月至2020年12月BRPC术前门静脉切除重建患者的病历。根据患者术后总生存期(OS)分为短期组(≤2年)和长期组(≤2年)。进行单因素和多因素分析,比较两组患者围手术期变量和长期预后,以确定相关的独立预后因素。所有患者按7:3的比例随机分为训练集和验证集。分别通过训练集和验证集中的上述变量建立逻辑回归模型并对其准确性进行评价,并通过nomogram进行可视化。同时,对模型进行了精度、受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)曲线下面积(AUC)、标定分析等方面的验证和比较。然后根据SHAP值对围手术期变量进行绘制和排序,找出最重要的变量。将前4个最重要的变量与上述独立预后因素进行比较。最后,利用以上4个变量构建支持向量机(SVM)、随机森林、决策树、XGBoost等模型。采用10倍分层交叉验证和ROC曲线下面积(AUC)比较各模型的准确性。结果:104例患者入组研究,中位OS为15.5个月,0.5年、1年和2年OS分别为81.7%、57.7%和30.8%。在长期组(n = 32)和短期组(n = 72)中,总中位生存时间和1、2、3年总生存时间分别为38个月、100%、100%、61.3%和10个月、38.9%、0%、0%。通过单因素和多因素分析,年龄、血管浸润长度、血管形态畸形、局部淋巴结病变等4个变量为两组间的独立危险因素。训练集(n = 72)与验证集(n = 32)的AUC分别为0.881和0.875。SHAP值表明,上述变量前4个最重要。logistic回归10倍分层交叉验证的AUC(0.864)优于支持向量机(0.693)、随机森林(0.789)、决策树(0.790)和XGBoost(0.726)。结论:年龄、血管侵袭长度、血管形态畸形、局部淋巴结病变是影响BRPC患者术前长期生存的独立危险因素。逻辑回归模型对BRPC患者的长期生存具有预测作用,并可进一步帮助外科医生决定BRPC患者的治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer Imaging
Cancer Imaging ONCOLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
66
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Imaging is an open access, peer-reviewed journal publishing original articles, reviews and editorials written by expert international radiologists working in oncology. The journal encompasses CT, MR, PET, ultrasound, radionuclide and multimodal imaging in all kinds of malignant tumours, plus new developments, techniques and innovations. Topics of interest include: Breast Imaging Chest Complications of treatment Ear, Nose & Throat Gastrointestinal Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Imaging biomarkers Interventional Lymphoma Measurement of tumour response Molecular functional imaging Musculoskeletal Neuro oncology Nuclear Medicine Paediatric.
期刊最新文献
Percutaneous ablation of T1b renal tumors: a review. Systematic effects of patient factors and scanner/protocol factors on a Restriction Spectrum Imaging (RSI) quantitative MRI biomarker for prostate cancer. Magnetic resonance imaging-based radiomics of mesorectum for predicting extramural venous invasion in patients with rectal cancer: a bi-centric study. Improving patient understanding of oncology imaging: radiologist and patient evaluation of summarised versus full-length AI-simplified reports from a tertiary cancer centre. Noninvasive prediction of glypican-3 expression and recurrence-free survival in hepatocellular carcinoma using contrast-enhanced ultrasound.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1