A real-world pharmacovigilance study of blinatumomab based on the FDA adverse event reporting system.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Expert Opinion on Drug Safety Pub Date : 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1080/14740338.2025.2464070
Zheng Zhang, Wenhao Guo, Minghao Chen, Qianzhi Yang, Xia Song, Yuping Wang
{"title":"A real-world pharmacovigilance study of blinatumomab based on the FDA adverse event reporting system.","authors":"Zheng Zhang, Wenhao Guo, Minghao Chen, Qianzhi Yang, Xia Song, Yuping Wang","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2464070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Blinatumomab, the first CD3/CD19 bispecific antibody, is FDA-approved for relapsed or refractory precursor B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia in adults and children. This study evaluates its safety profile through pharmacovigilance analysis of adverse events (AEs) reported in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted a disproportionality analysis using four algorithms: Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and Multi-Item Gamma Poisson Shrinker (MGPS). Data from 2014Q1 to 2023Q4 were analyzed to identify safety signals related to blinatumomab, along with a stratification analysis to examine AE onset timing.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>A total of 17,131 AE reports were retrieved from the FAERS database, with 6,266 indicating blinatumomab as the primary suspect. We identified 277 preferred terms (PTs) demonstrating significant disproportionality across all algorithms. Notably, unexpected AEs included Graft Versus Host Disease, myelosuppression, and hypokalaemia. Common AEs were consistent across gender and age groups, predominantly occurring within one month of treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This pharmacovigilance study utilizing the FAERS database identified potential AE signals associated with blinatumomab, providing essential insights for its safe clinical use.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2025.2464070","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Blinatumomab, the first CD3/CD19 bispecific antibody, is FDA-approved for relapsed or refractory precursor B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia in adults and children. This study evaluates its safety profile through pharmacovigilance analysis of adverse events (AEs) reported in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).

Method: We conducted a disproportionality analysis using four algorithms: Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and Multi-Item Gamma Poisson Shrinker (MGPS). Data from 2014Q1 to 2023Q4 were analyzed to identify safety signals related to blinatumomab, along with a stratification analysis to examine AE onset timing.

Result: A total of 17,131 AE reports were retrieved from the FAERS database, with 6,266 indicating blinatumomab as the primary suspect. We identified 277 preferred terms (PTs) demonstrating significant disproportionality across all algorithms. Notably, unexpected AEs included Graft Versus Host Disease, myelosuppression, and hypokalaemia. Common AEs were consistent across gender and age groups, predominantly occurring within one month of treatment.

Conclusion: This pharmacovigilance study utilizing the FAERS database identified potential AE signals associated with blinatumomab, providing essential insights for its safe clinical use.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于FDA不良事件报告系统的blinatumumab的现实世界药物警戒研究。
背景:Blinatumomab是首个CD3/CD19双特异性抗体,被fda批准用于成人和儿童复发或难治性前体b细胞急性淋巴细胞白血病。本研究通过对FDA不良事件报告系统(FAERS)中报告的不良事件(ae)进行药物警戒分析来评估其安全性。方法:采用报告优势比(ROR)、比例报告比(PRR)、贝叶斯置信传播神经网络(BCPNN)和多项目伽玛泊松收缩器(MGPS)四种算法进行歧化分析。分析2014Q1 - 2023Q4的数据,以确定与blinatumomab相关的安全信号,并进行分层分析,以检查AE的发病时间。结果:FAERS数据库共检索到17,131例AE报告,其中6,266例提示blinatumomab为主要可疑药物。我们确定了277个首选术语(PTs),在所有算法中显示出显著的歧化。值得注意的是,意外的不良反应包括移植物抗宿主病、骨髓抑制和低钾血症。常见不良事件在性别和年龄组中是一致的,主要发生在治疗的一个月内。结论:这项利用FAERS数据库的药物警戒研究发现了与blinatumomab相关的潜在AE信号,为其安全临床应用提供了重要见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Drug Safety ranks #62 of 216 in the Pharmacology & Pharmacy category in the 2008 ISI Journal Citation Reports. Expert Opinion on Drug Safety (ISSN 1474-0338 [print], 1744-764X [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles on all aspects of drug safety and original papers on the clinical implications of drug treatment safety issues, providing expert opinion on the scope for future development.
期刊最新文献
Safety and efficacy of currently used drug therapies for treatment of lymphomas in patients with Sjögren's disease, a scoping review. Insights gained from drug utilization research to improve safe clinical practice for children and adolescents in Denmark. Safe prescribing of antihypertensive drugs in the elderly and managing the risk of adverse events. Safety concerns associated with various types of statins: a disproportionality analysis of the FAERS database. Increased reporting of accidental overdose with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists: a population-based study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1