Development of Patient-Specific Nomogram to Assist in Clinical Decision-Making for Single Port Versus Multi-Port Robotic Partial Nephrectomy: A Report from the Single Port Advanced Robotic Consortium.
Nicolas A Soputro, Kennedy E Okhawere, Roxana Ramos-Carpinteyro, Ruben Sauer Calvo, Yuzhi Wang, Celeste Manfredi, Elizabeth Snajdar, Michael Raver, Indu Saini, Jaya S Chavali, Carter D Mikesell, Adriana M Pedraza, Mutahar Ahmed, Michael D Stifelman, Craig Rogers, Adam Lorentz, Riccardo Autorino, Bertram Yuh, Ryan J Nelson, Simone Crivellaro, Ketan K Badani, Jihad Kaouk
{"title":"Development of Patient-Specific Nomogram to Assist in Clinical Decision-Making for Single Port Versus Multi-Port Robotic Partial Nephrectomy: A Report from the Single Port Advanced Robotic Consortium.","authors":"Nicolas A Soputro, Kennedy E Okhawere, Roxana Ramos-Carpinteyro, Ruben Sauer Calvo, Yuzhi Wang, Celeste Manfredi, Elizabeth Snajdar, Michael Raver, Indu Saini, Jaya S Chavali, Carter D Mikesell, Adriana M Pedraza, Mutahar Ahmed, Michael D Stifelman, Craig Rogers, Adam Lorentz, Riccardo Autorino, Bertram Yuh, Ryan J Nelson, Simone Crivellaro, Ketan K Badani, Jihad Kaouk","doi":"10.1089/end.2024.0547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> To develop a patient-specific algorithm to better guide clinical decision-making when considering between single port (SP) and multi-port (MP) robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN). <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> A retrospective review was performed on the institutional review board-approved, prospectively maintained multi-institutional database of the Single Port Advanced Research Consortium to identify all consecutive patients who underwent SP and MP-RPN between 2019 and 2023. Baseline clinicodemographic variables were used to identify the significant predictors of SP-RPN. The significant variables were used to construct a nomogram to predict the likelihood of SP vs MP-RPN. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Of the 1021 patients included in our analysis, 189 (18.5%) and 832 (81.5%) underwent SP and MP-RPN, respectively. Statistically significant predictors of SP-RPN included a lower comorbidity profile, a significant abdominal surgical history as characterized by a higher Hostile Abdomen Index, as well as tumors of lower complexity. The nomogram generated using the aforementioned variables demonstrated a reasonable performance with an area under the curve of 0.79. An optimal cutoff point was determined, with likelihood ratios above 0.12 indicating a preference for SP-RPN. Of note, all SP-RPN cases that scored above the 0.12 cutoff exhibited improved perioperative outcomes, including shorter ischemia time and less intraoperative blood loss. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> In this study, we have devised a novel patient selection nomogram aimed at enhancing clinical decision-making within the expanding repertoire of RPN approaches. The findings highlighted in this study offer valuable guidance to facilitate appropriate patient selection and thereby ensuring favorable perioperative outcomes associated with RPN procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":15723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endourology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endourology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2024.0547","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To develop a patient-specific algorithm to better guide clinical decision-making when considering between single port (SP) and multi-port (MP) robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN). Materials and Methods: A retrospective review was performed on the institutional review board-approved, prospectively maintained multi-institutional database of the Single Port Advanced Research Consortium to identify all consecutive patients who underwent SP and MP-RPN between 2019 and 2023. Baseline clinicodemographic variables were used to identify the significant predictors of SP-RPN. The significant variables were used to construct a nomogram to predict the likelihood of SP vs MP-RPN. Results: Of the 1021 patients included in our analysis, 189 (18.5%) and 832 (81.5%) underwent SP and MP-RPN, respectively. Statistically significant predictors of SP-RPN included a lower comorbidity profile, a significant abdominal surgical history as characterized by a higher Hostile Abdomen Index, as well as tumors of lower complexity. The nomogram generated using the aforementioned variables demonstrated a reasonable performance with an area under the curve of 0.79. An optimal cutoff point was determined, with likelihood ratios above 0.12 indicating a preference for SP-RPN. Of note, all SP-RPN cases that scored above the 0.12 cutoff exhibited improved perioperative outcomes, including shorter ischemia time and less intraoperative blood loss. Conclusions: In this study, we have devised a novel patient selection nomogram aimed at enhancing clinical decision-making within the expanding repertoire of RPN approaches. The findings highlighted in this study offer valuable guidance to facilitate appropriate patient selection and thereby ensuring favorable perioperative outcomes associated with RPN procedures.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Endourology, JE Case Reports, and Videourology are the leading peer-reviewed journal, case reports publication, and innovative videojournal companion covering all aspects of minimally invasive urology research, applications, and clinical outcomes.
The leading journal of minimally invasive urology for over 30 years, Journal of Endourology is the essential publication for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest surgical technologies in endoscopic, laparoscopic, robotic, and image-guided procedures as they apply to benign and malignant diseases of the genitourinary tract. This flagship journal includes the companion videojournal Videourology™ with every subscription. While Journal of Endourology remains focused on publishing rigorously peer reviewed articles, Videourology accepts original videos containing material that has not been reported elsewhere, except in the form of an abstract or a conference presentation.
Journal of Endourology coverage includes:
The latest laparoscopic, robotic, endoscopic, and image-guided techniques for treating both benign and malignant conditions
Pioneering research articles
Controversial cases in endourology
Techniques in endourology with accompanying videos
Reviews and epochs in endourology
Endourology survey section of endourology relevant manuscripts published in other journals.