Emerging Role of Laser Lithotripsy for Bladder Stones: Real-World Outcomes from Two European Endourology Centers with a Systematic Review of Literature.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Journal of endourology Pub Date : 2025-02-05 DOI:10.1089/end.2024.0640
Clara Cerrato, Maria Florencia Frascheri, Shriya Napoleon Fernandez, Esteban Emiliani, Paola Arena, Amelia Pietropaolo, Bhaskar K Somani
{"title":"Emerging Role of Laser Lithotripsy for Bladder Stones: Real-World Outcomes from Two European Endourology Centers with a Systematic Review of Literature.","authors":"Clara Cerrato, Maria Florencia Frascheri, Shriya Napoleon Fernandez, Esteban Emiliani, Paola Arena, Amelia Pietropaolo, Bhaskar K Somani","doi":"10.1089/end.2024.0640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction and Objective:</i></b> We aimed to look at the evidence for laser lithotripsy for bladder stones (BSs) to provide results from two centers on bladder calculi treatment. In addition, the outcomes of prostatic and other surgical interventions performed in nearly half of all patients. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A retrospective analysis of two large European endourology tertiary centers for patients who underwent laser lithotripsy for BS between 2016 and 2024 (7 years). All patients provided consent and were counseled for the study accordingly, and the studies were registered as an audit in the individual centers. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 122 patients were analyzed (mean age of 68.17 ±16.38 years; male:female ratio of 97:25). Thirteen (10.7%) patients had a preoperative long-term catheter. Overall, 42 (34.43%) patients had multiple stones (<i>n</i> = 2.19, ±2.08), with a median stone burden of 32.36 ± 24.13 mm. The mean operative time was 61.6 ± 37.25 minutes, with an overall stone-free rate (SFR) of 95.1% (<i>n</i> = 116). Postoperative complications were noted in nine (7.38%) patients, which included urinary tract infection or sepsis (<i>n</i> = 4, 3%), pain (<i>n</i> = 2, 1.6%), and bleeding/acute urinary retention/urethral stone (<i>n</i> = 1 each, 0.82%). All the complications were Clavien-Dindo I/II and treated conservatively. Six patients (4.9%) with planned concomitant surgical intervention needed a completion (second) intervention at a later date. Sixty patients (49.2%) had concomitant procedure along with their BS treatment. Twenty-two patients (18%) with a mean prostate size of 60.71 cc (±30.50 cc) underwent a transurethral resection of prostate (<i>n</i> = 16, 13.1%) or bladder neck incision (<i>n</i> = 6, 4.9%). Others underwent ureteroscopy (<i>n</i> = 13, 10.7%), transurethral resection of bladder tumor (<i>n</i> = 5, 4.1%), suprapubic catheter repositioning (<i>n</i> = 10, 8.2%), or urethral dilation (<i>n</i> = 10, 8.2%). The mean hospital stay was 1.4 ± 1.33 days. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Laser fragmentation of BSs stands out as a safe and efficient choice with a good SFR and low risk of major complications, and perhaps should be considered the new gold standard for BS management. It also allows for concomitant treatment of enlarged prostate and other endourologic procedures with good outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":15723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endourology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endourology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2024.0640","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and Objective: We aimed to look at the evidence for laser lithotripsy for bladder stones (BSs) to provide results from two centers on bladder calculi treatment. In addition, the outcomes of prostatic and other surgical interventions performed in nearly half of all patients. Methods: A retrospective analysis of two large European endourology tertiary centers for patients who underwent laser lithotripsy for BS between 2016 and 2024 (7 years). All patients provided consent and were counseled for the study accordingly, and the studies were registered as an audit in the individual centers. Results: A total of 122 patients were analyzed (mean age of 68.17 ±16.38 years; male:female ratio of 97:25). Thirteen (10.7%) patients had a preoperative long-term catheter. Overall, 42 (34.43%) patients had multiple stones (n = 2.19, ±2.08), with a median stone burden of 32.36 ± 24.13 mm. The mean operative time was 61.6 ± 37.25 minutes, with an overall stone-free rate (SFR) of 95.1% (n = 116). Postoperative complications were noted in nine (7.38%) patients, which included urinary tract infection or sepsis (n = 4, 3%), pain (n = 2, 1.6%), and bleeding/acute urinary retention/urethral stone (n = 1 each, 0.82%). All the complications were Clavien-Dindo I/II and treated conservatively. Six patients (4.9%) with planned concomitant surgical intervention needed a completion (second) intervention at a later date. Sixty patients (49.2%) had concomitant procedure along with their BS treatment. Twenty-two patients (18%) with a mean prostate size of 60.71 cc (±30.50 cc) underwent a transurethral resection of prostate (n = 16, 13.1%) or bladder neck incision (n = 6, 4.9%). Others underwent ureteroscopy (n = 13, 10.7%), transurethral resection of bladder tumor (n = 5, 4.1%), suprapubic catheter repositioning (n = 10, 8.2%), or urethral dilation (n = 10, 8.2%). The mean hospital stay was 1.4 ± 1.33 days. Conclusion: Laser fragmentation of BSs stands out as a safe and efficient choice with a good SFR and low risk of major complications, and perhaps should be considered the new gold standard for BS management. It also allows for concomitant treatment of enlarged prostate and other endourologic procedures with good outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of endourology
Journal of endourology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
14.80%
发文量
254
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Endourology, JE Case Reports, and Videourology are the leading peer-reviewed journal, case reports publication, and innovative videojournal companion covering all aspects of minimally invasive urology research, applications, and clinical outcomes. The leading journal of minimally invasive urology for over 30 years, Journal of Endourology is the essential publication for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest surgical technologies in endoscopic, laparoscopic, robotic, and image-guided procedures as they apply to benign and malignant diseases of the genitourinary tract. This flagship journal includes the companion videojournal Videourology™ with every subscription. While Journal of Endourology remains focused on publishing rigorously peer reviewed articles, Videourology accepts original videos containing material that has not been reported elsewhere, except in the form of an abstract or a conference presentation. Journal of Endourology coverage includes: The latest laparoscopic, robotic, endoscopic, and image-guided techniques for treating both benign and malignant conditions Pioneering research articles Controversial cases in endourology Techniques in endourology with accompanying videos Reviews and epochs in endourology Endourology survey section of endourology relevant manuscripts published in other journals.
期刊最新文献
Letter to the Editor: Caution in Interpreting Retrospective Data on Percutaneous Nephrostomy and Retrograde Ureteral Stenting for Obstructive Pyelonephritis. MRI Fusion Cryoablation: Is There an Outcome Difference Between Anterior and Posterior Lesions? Association Between Renal Pelvis Urine Density and the Risk of Infectious Complications after Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery. Development of Patient-Specific Nomogram to Assist in Clinical Decision-Making for Single Port Versus Multi-Port Robotic Partial Nephrectomy: A Report from the Single Port Advanced Robotic Consortium. Emerging Role of Laser Lithotripsy for Bladder Stones: Real-World Outcomes from Two European Endourology Centers with a Systematic Review of Literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1