Emerging Role of Laser Lithotripsy for Bladder Stones: Real-World Outcomes from Two European Endourology Centers with a Systematic Review of Literature.
Clara Cerrato, Maria Florencia Frascheri, Shriya Napoleon Fernandez, Esteban Emiliani, Paola Arena, Amelia Pietropaolo, Bhaskar K Somani
{"title":"Emerging Role of Laser Lithotripsy for Bladder Stones: Real-World Outcomes from Two European Endourology Centers with a Systematic Review of Literature.","authors":"Clara Cerrato, Maria Florencia Frascheri, Shriya Napoleon Fernandez, Esteban Emiliani, Paola Arena, Amelia Pietropaolo, Bhaskar K Somani","doi":"10.1089/end.2024.0640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction and Objective:</i></b> We aimed to look at the evidence for laser lithotripsy for bladder stones (BSs) to provide results from two centers on bladder calculi treatment. In addition, the outcomes of prostatic and other surgical interventions performed in nearly half of all patients. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A retrospective analysis of two large European endourology tertiary centers for patients who underwent laser lithotripsy for BS between 2016 and 2024 (7 years). All patients provided consent and were counseled for the study accordingly, and the studies were registered as an audit in the individual centers. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 122 patients were analyzed (mean age of 68.17 ±16.38 years; male:female ratio of 97:25). Thirteen (10.7%) patients had a preoperative long-term catheter. Overall, 42 (34.43%) patients had multiple stones (<i>n</i> = 2.19, ±2.08), with a median stone burden of 32.36 ± 24.13 mm. The mean operative time was 61.6 ± 37.25 minutes, with an overall stone-free rate (SFR) of 95.1% (<i>n</i> = 116). Postoperative complications were noted in nine (7.38%) patients, which included urinary tract infection or sepsis (<i>n</i> = 4, 3%), pain (<i>n</i> = 2, 1.6%), and bleeding/acute urinary retention/urethral stone (<i>n</i> = 1 each, 0.82%). All the complications were Clavien-Dindo I/II and treated conservatively. Six patients (4.9%) with planned concomitant surgical intervention needed a completion (second) intervention at a later date. Sixty patients (49.2%) had concomitant procedure along with their BS treatment. Twenty-two patients (18%) with a mean prostate size of 60.71 cc (±30.50 cc) underwent a transurethral resection of prostate (<i>n</i> = 16, 13.1%) or bladder neck incision (<i>n</i> = 6, 4.9%). Others underwent ureteroscopy (<i>n</i> = 13, 10.7%), transurethral resection of bladder tumor (<i>n</i> = 5, 4.1%), suprapubic catheter repositioning (<i>n</i> = 10, 8.2%), or urethral dilation (<i>n</i> = 10, 8.2%). The mean hospital stay was 1.4 ± 1.33 days. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Laser fragmentation of BSs stands out as a safe and efficient choice with a good SFR and low risk of major complications, and perhaps should be considered the new gold standard for BS management. It also allows for concomitant treatment of enlarged prostate and other endourologic procedures with good outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":15723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endourology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endourology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2024.0640","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction and Objective: We aimed to look at the evidence for laser lithotripsy for bladder stones (BSs) to provide results from two centers on bladder calculi treatment. In addition, the outcomes of prostatic and other surgical interventions performed in nearly half of all patients. Methods: A retrospective analysis of two large European endourology tertiary centers for patients who underwent laser lithotripsy for BS between 2016 and 2024 (7 years). All patients provided consent and were counseled for the study accordingly, and the studies were registered as an audit in the individual centers. Results: A total of 122 patients were analyzed (mean age of 68.17 ±16.38 years; male:female ratio of 97:25). Thirteen (10.7%) patients had a preoperative long-term catheter. Overall, 42 (34.43%) patients had multiple stones (n = 2.19, ±2.08), with a median stone burden of 32.36 ± 24.13 mm. The mean operative time was 61.6 ± 37.25 minutes, with an overall stone-free rate (SFR) of 95.1% (n = 116). Postoperative complications were noted in nine (7.38%) patients, which included urinary tract infection or sepsis (n = 4, 3%), pain (n = 2, 1.6%), and bleeding/acute urinary retention/urethral stone (n = 1 each, 0.82%). All the complications were Clavien-Dindo I/II and treated conservatively. Six patients (4.9%) with planned concomitant surgical intervention needed a completion (second) intervention at a later date. Sixty patients (49.2%) had concomitant procedure along with their BS treatment. Twenty-two patients (18%) with a mean prostate size of 60.71 cc (±30.50 cc) underwent a transurethral resection of prostate (n = 16, 13.1%) or bladder neck incision (n = 6, 4.9%). Others underwent ureteroscopy (n = 13, 10.7%), transurethral resection of bladder tumor (n = 5, 4.1%), suprapubic catheter repositioning (n = 10, 8.2%), or urethral dilation (n = 10, 8.2%). The mean hospital stay was 1.4 ± 1.33 days. Conclusion: Laser fragmentation of BSs stands out as a safe and efficient choice with a good SFR and low risk of major complications, and perhaps should be considered the new gold standard for BS management. It also allows for concomitant treatment of enlarged prostate and other endourologic procedures with good outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Endourology, JE Case Reports, and Videourology are the leading peer-reviewed journal, case reports publication, and innovative videojournal companion covering all aspects of minimally invasive urology research, applications, and clinical outcomes.
The leading journal of minimally invasive urology for over 30 years, Journal of Endourology is the essential publication for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest surgical technologies in endoscopic, laparoscopic, robotic, and image-guided procedures as they apply to benign and malignant diseases of the genitourinary tract. This flagship journal includes the companion videojournal Videourology™ with every subscription. While Journal of Endourology remains focused on publishing rigorously peer reviewed articles, Videourology accepts original videos containing material that has not been reported elsewhere, except in the form of an abstract or a conference presentation.
Journal of Endourology coverage includes:
The latest laparoscopic, robotic, endoscopic, and image-guided techniques for treating both benign and malignant conditions
Pioneering research articles
Controversial cases in endourology
Techniques in endourology with accompanying videos
Reviews and epochs in endourology
Endourology survey section of endourology relevant manuscripts published in other journals.