Getting to specialty treatment in dermatologic inflammatory conditions: Treatment requirements and patient journey.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.2.147
Matthew G Bowles, Autumn D Zuckerman, Josh DeClercq, Leena Choi, Mackenzie Ellis, Chelsea P Renfro
{"title":"Getting to specialty treatment in dermatologic inflammatory conditions: Treatment requirements and patient journey.","authors":"Matthew G Bowles, Autumn D Zuckerman, Josh DeClercq, Leena Choi, Mackenzie Ellis, Chelsea P Renfro","doi":"10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.2.147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many payers and pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) use step therapy requirements and formulary alternatives to reduce prescription spending. The clinical utility and ultimate therapy outcomes for patients participating in these programs is an area of needed research.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate medication outcomes and time requirements to access therapy in patients required to use a step therapy or formulary alternative after being prescribed a specialty medication for psoriasis (PsO) or atopic dermatitis (AD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center, retrospective review of data collected from electronic health records and the specialty pharmacy patient management system was conducted. Patients were included if they had a referral for a specialty medication by a dermatology provider for PsO or AD that was discontinued because of the payer/PBM requiring step therapy or formulary alternative use from January 2021 to June 2022. The primary outcome was the number of days from the time of patient referral for specialty medication until the second specialty medication referral. Secondary outcomes included the number of patients that failed step therapy or formulary alternative and were referred back to the specialty pharmacy as well as the number of patients not started on a specialty medication and the reason.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The included patients (N = 83) were predominantly White (75%) and female (61%) with a median age of 50 years (interquartile range [IQR] = 37-61 years). 51% of patients had an indication of AD. 62 patients were required to use step therapy, and 21 were required to use a formulary alternative. Of the patients required to use step therapy, 37 (60%) had a second referral for a specialty medication because of failing step therapy requirements, with a median time to a second referral of 75 days (IQR = 27-135). The remaining 25 patients were not started on a specialty medication: 5 patients (8%) benefited from and remained on step therapy, 15 (24%) were lost to follow-up, 3 (5%) decided not to start step therapy, and 2 (3%) were referred for psoriatic arthritis evaluation. All patients required to use a formulary alternative initiated specialty medication with a median time from the initial referral to second referral of 3 days (IQR = 1-9 days).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most patients required to complete nonspecialty step therapy ultimately initiated specialty medications after a lengthy delay, demonstrating the potential impact of step therapy requirements on initiating clinically appropriate treatment for AD and PsO. Further research assessing the financial burden and clinical impact of requiring step therapy before specialty medications is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":16170,"journal":{"name":"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy","volume":"31 2","pages":"147-156"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11852794/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.2.147","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Many payers and pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) use step therapy requirements and formulary alternatives to reduce prescription spending. The clinical utility and ultimate therapy outcomes for patients participating in these programs is an area of needed research.

Objective: To evaluate medication outcomes and time requirements to access therapy in patients required to use a step therapy or formulary alternative after being prescribed a specialty medication for psoriasis (PsO) or atopic dermatitis (AD).

Methods: A single-center, retrospective review of data collected from electronic health records and the specialty pharmacy patient management system was conducted. Patients were included if they had a referral for a specialty medication by a dermatology provider for PsO or AD that was discontinued because of the payer/PBM requiring step therapy or formulary alternative use from January 2021 to June 2022. The primary outcome was the number of days from the time of patient referral for specialty medication until the second specialty medication referral. Secondary outcomes included the number of patients that failed step therapy or formulary alternative and were referred back to the specialty pharmacy as well as the number of patients not started on a specialty medication and the reason.

Results: The included patients (N = 83) were predominantly White (75%) and female (61%) with a median age of 50 years (interquartile range [IQR] = 37-61 years). 51% of patients had an indication of AD. 62 patients were required to use step therapy, and 21 were required to use a formulary alternative. Of the patients required to use step therapy, 37 (60%) had a second referral for a specialty medication because of failing step therapy requirements, with a median time to a second referral of 75 days (IQR = 27-135). The remaining 25 patients were not started on a specialty medication: 5 patients (8%) benefited from and remained on step therapy, 15 (24%) were lost to follow-up, 3 (5%) decided not to start step therapy, and 2 (3%) were referred for psoriatic arthritis evaluation. All patients required to use a formulary alternative initiated specialty medication with a median time from the initial referral to second referral of 3 days (IQR = 1-9 days).

Conclusions: Most patients required to complete nonspecialty step therapy ultimately initiated specialty medications after a lengthy delay, demonstrating the potential impact of step therapy requirements on initiating clinically appropriate treatment for AD and PsO. Further research assessing the financial burden and clinical impact of requiring step therapy before specialty medications is warranted.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
相关文献
Methodological pluralism: A framework for psychotherapy research
IF 3 3区 心理学Journal of Clinical PsychologyPub Date : 1999-11-23 DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4679(199912)55:12<1453::AID-JCLP4>3.0.CO;2-C
Brent D. Slife, Edwin E. Gantt
A phenomenological framework for psychiatric nursing research
IF 2.3 4区 医学Archives of Psychiatric NursingPub Date : 2002-08-01 DOI: 10.1053/apnu.2002.34393
Carol Stubblefield, Ruth L. Murray
来源期刊
Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy
Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy Health Professions-Pharmacy
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
131
期刊介绍: JMCP welcomes research studies conducted outside of the United States that are relevant to our readership. Our audience is primarily concerned with designing policies of formulary coverage, health benefit design, and pharmaceutical programs that are based on evidence from large populations of people. Studies of pharmacist interventions conducted outside the United States that have already been extensively studied within the United States and studies of small sample sizes in non-managed care environments outside of the United States (e.g., hospitals or community pharmacies) are generally of low interest to our readership. However, studies of health outcomes and costs assessed in large populations that provide evidence for formulary coverage, health benefit design, and pharmaceutical programs are of high interest to JMCP’s readership.
期刊最新文献
Use of health technology assessments in specialty drug coverage decisions by US commercial health plans. Cost-effectiveness of caplacizumab in immune thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura in the United States. The impact of patient characteristics and social drivers of health factors on oral oncolytic adherence. Treatment patterns, health care resource utilization, and costs of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell vs standard therapy for relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma in the United States. Evaluating the uptake of a Global Initiative for Asthma guideline update in a commercially insured, value-based care population.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1