Nada Ali, Justin Chan, Anna Meehan, Brent Collett, Sarah Benki-Nugent, Randall A Bly, Shyam Gollakota, Juliana Bonilla-Velez, Emily R Gallagher
{"title":"An Open-Source Smartphone Otoacoustic Emissions Test for Infants.","authors":"Nada Ali, Justin Chan, Anna Meehan, Brent Collett, Sarah Benki-Nugent, Randall A Bly, Shyam Gollakota, Juliana Bonilla-Velez, Emily R Gallagher","doi":"10.1542/peds.2024-068068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Universal hearing screening is essential for early identification of infants with hearing loss, yet there is a lack of low-cost, scalable equipment suitable for resource-constrained settings. Here we test a low-cost smartphone device for infant hearing screening.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Infants aged 0 to 6 months were recruited from 3 ambulatory clinics at Seattle Children's Hospital with a high prevalence of hearing loss. We compared results from a low-cost open-source distortion product otoacoustic emission (OAE) probe and smartphone app with results from a commercially available OAE device. Hearing status was confirmed using newborn hearing screening, diagnostic testing, or both. Primary outcomes were referral rate as well as sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value compared with known hearing status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among N = 76 infants, the mean age at screening was 3.1 ± 1.9 months and 13% had hearing loss. Referral rates were 24% and 26% for the smartphone and conventional devices, respectively. Both devices demonstrated 100% sensitivity (95% CI, 0.69-1.00) and negative predictive value (95% CI, 0.94-1.00). Specificity was 88% (95% CI, 0.78-0.95) and 85% (95% CI, 0.74-0.92) for the smartphone and conventional devices, respectively. Positive predictive value was 56% (95% CI, 0.31-0.78) for the smartphone and 50% (95% CI, 0.27-0.73) for the conventional device.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The smartphone-based OAE device effectively screened hearing in high-prevalence infants. Thus, smartphone-based OAE detection may be a promising low-cost solution to the challenge of building scalable universal newborn and infant hearing screening programs in resource-constrained settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":20028,"journal":{"name":"Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2024-068068","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Universal hearing screening is essential for early identification of infants with hearing loss, yet there is a lack of low-cost, scalable equipment suitable for resource-constrained settings. Here we test a low-cost smartphone device for infant hearing screening.
Methods: Infants aged 0 to 6 months were recruited from 3 ambulatory clinics at Seattle Children's Hospital with a high prevalence of hearing loss. We compared results from a low-cost open-source distortion product otoacoustic emission (OAE) probe and smartphone app with results from a commercially available OAE device. Hearing status was confirmed using newborn hearing screening, diagnostic testing, or both. Primary outcomes were referral rate as well as sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value compared with known hearing status.
Results: Among N = 76 infants, the mean age at screening was 3.1 ± 1.9 months and 13% had hearing loss. Referral rates were 24% and 26% for the smartphone and conventional devices, respectively. Both devices demonstrated 100% sensitivity (95% CI, 0.69-1.00) and negative predictive value (95% CI, 0.94-1.00). Specificity was 88% (95% CI, 0.78-0.95) and 85% (95% CI, 0.74-0.92) for the smartphone and conventional devices, respectively. Positive predictive value was 56% (95% CI, 0.31-0.78) for the smartphone and 50% (95% CI, 0.27-0.73) for the conventional device.
Conclusion: The smartphone-based OAE device effectively screened hearing in high-prevalence infants. Thus, smartphone-based OAE detection may be a promising low-cost solution to the challenge of building scalable universal newborn and infant hearing screening programs in resource-constrained settings.
期刊介绍:
The Pediatrics® journal is the official flagship journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP). It is widely cited in the field of pediatric medicine and is recognized as the leading journal in the field.
The journal publishes original research and evidence-based articles, which provide authoritative information to help readers stay up-to-date with the latest developments in pediatric medicine. The content is peer-reviewed and undergoes rigorous evaluation to ensure its quality and reliability.
Pediatrics also serves as a valuable resource for conducting new research studies and supporting education and training activities in the field of pediatrics. It aims to enhance the quality of pediatric outpatient and inpatient care by disseminating valuable knowledge and insights.
As of 2023, Pediatrics has an impressive Journal Impact Factor (IF) Score of 8.0. The IF is a measure of a journal's influence and importance in the scientific community, with higher scores indicating a greater impact. This score reflects the significance and reach of the research published in Pediatrics, further establishing its prominence in the field of pediatric medicine.