Amr Youssef Arkoubi, Zainalabden E Jefri, Faris A Aldaghri, Faisal M Obeid, Abdulaziz Saleh Almodumeegh, Abdulmajeed Alhadlaq, Waiel A Daghistani, Hatan Mortada
{"title":"Ethical Dilemmas in Plastic Surgery: Insights From a Survey Study in Saudi Arabia.","authors":"Amr Youssef Arkoubi, Zainalabden E Jefri, Faris A Aldaghri, Faisal M Obeid, Abdulaziz Saleh Almodumeegh, Abdulmajeed Alhadlaq, Waiel A Daghistani, Hatan Mortada","doi":"10.1097/GOX.0000000000006510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Plastic surgery often presents complex ethical dilemmas involving patient autonomy, informed consent, and resource allocation. This study aimed to explore these challenges and their impact on surgeons' decision-making processes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey study was conducted among plastic surgeons in Saudi Arabia between May and June 2024. An online-validated questionnaire was distributed to consultants, residents, and registrars. The survey covered demographic information and ethical dilemma scenarios. Data were analyzed using SPSS, with chi-square tests used to assess associations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 75 participants, 53.3% were consultants, 82.7% were male, and the majority (38.7%) were between 30 and 39 years of age. Most surgeons (41.3%) reported rarely encountering ethical dilemmas, with managing patient expectations being the most common issue, cited by 48.0% of respondents. Professional guidelines influenced decision-making for 56.0% of the participants. Consultants and residents had differing experiences; consultants were more concerned about advertising practices (75.0% compared with 12.5%) and complications (70.0% compared with 30.0%), whereas residents focused primarily on resource allocation (100.0% versus none of the consultants).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Plastic surgeons in Saudi Arabia face various ethical challenges, with differences noted between consultants and residents. The findings highlight the importance of addressing these challenges to enhance decision-making and patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":20149,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","volume":"13 2","pages":"e6510"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11798369/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000006510","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Plastic surgery often presents complex ethical dilemmas involving patient autonomy, informed consent, and resource allocation. This study aimed to explore these challenges and their impact on surgeons' decision-making processes.
Methods: A survey study was conducted among plastic surgeons in Saudi Arabia between May and June 2024. An online-validated questionnaire was distributed to consultants, residents, and registrars. The survey covered demographic information and ethical dilemma scenarios. Data were analyzed using SPSS, with chi-square tests used to assess associations.
Results: Among the 75 participants, 53.3% were consultants, 82.7% were male, and the majority (38.7%) were between 30 and 39 years of age. Most surgeons (41.3%) reported rarely encountering ethical dilemmas, with managing patient expectations being the most common issue, cited by 48.0% of respondents. Professional guidelines influenced decision-making for 56.0% of the participants. Consultants and residents had differing experiences; consultants were more concerned about advertising practices (75.0% compared with 12.5%) and complications (70.0% compared with 30.0%), whereas residents focused primarily on resource allocation (100.0% versus none of the consultants).
Conclusions: Plastic surgeons in Saudi Arabia face various ethical challenges, with differences noted between consultants and residents. The findings highlight the importance of addressing these challenges to enhance decision-making and patient care.
期刊介绍:
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open is an open access, peer reviewed, international journal focusing on global plastic and reconstructive surgery.Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open publishes on all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including basic science/experimental studies pertinent to the field and also clinical articles on such topics as: breast reconstruction, head and neck surgery, pediatric and craniofacial surgery, hand and microsurgery, wound healing, and cosmetic and aesthetic surgery. Clinical studies, experimental articles, ideas and innovations, and techniques and case reports are all welcome article types. Manuscript submission is open to all surgeons, researchers, and other health care providers world-wide who wish to communicate their research results on topics related to plastic and reconstructive surgery. Furthermore, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open, a complimentary journal to Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, provides an open access venue for the publication of those research studies sponsored by private and public funding agencies that require open access publication of study results. Its mission is to disseminate high quality, peer reviewed research in plastic and reconstructive surgery to the widest possible global audience, through an open access platform. As an open access journal, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open offers its content for free to any viewer. Authors of articles retain their copyright to the materials published. Additionally, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open provides rapid review and publication of accepted papers.