Transfer Learning Prediction of Early Exposures and Genetic Risk Score on Adult Obesity in Two Minority Cohorts.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Prevention Science Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-06 DOI:10.1007/s11121-025-01781-3
Wenying Chen, Yuxin Liu, Shuo Zhang, Zhou Jiang, Ting Wang, Shuiping Huang, Ping Zeng
{"title":"Transfer Learning Prediction of Early Exposures and Genetic Risk Score on Adult Obesity in Two Minority Cohorts.","authors":"Wenying Chen, Yuxin Liu, Shuo Zhang, Zhou Jiang, Ting Wang, Shuiping Huang, Ping Zeng","doi":"10.1007/s11121-025-01781-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Due to ethnic heterogeneity in genetic architecture, genetic risk score (GRS) constructed within the European population generally possesses poor portability in underrepresented non-European populations, but substantial genetic similarity exists across diverse ancestral groups. We here explore the prediction performance of early exposures and GRS on body mass index (BMI) through leveraging genetic similarity knowledge acquired from Europeans into non-Europeans. We present a linear mixed prediction model for BMI in three distinct UK Biobank cohorts under the transfer learning framework, where we consider Asians (n = 7487) and Africans (n = 7533) as target samples and Europeans (n = 280,575) as informative auxiliary samples. Besides environmental and behavior exposures, we incorporate multiple BMI-related variants, by which the GRS is constructed via transfer machine learning techniques informed by genetic similarity shared across target and auxiliary samples. The use of GRS gained more predictive odds for BMI than the model with traditional risk factors alone in the Asian and African cohorts, leading to an approximately 3.6% and 0.7% accuracy improvement in each target population. After borrowing genetic similarity from Europeans via transfer learning, the R<sup>2</sup> increased to 0.270 for Asians and 0.302 for Africans, enhanced by 21.1% and 7.5%, respectively, compared to the early exposure-only models. We also provided evidence for the well-known conclusion that GRS constructed in the European population behaved poorly in non-Europeans. Prediction accuracy is greatly elevated in racial minority or underrepresented populations via the transfer learning method by leveraging shared genetic similarity from informative auxiliary populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":48268,"journal":{"name":"Prevention Science","volume":" ","pages":"234-245"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prevention Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-025-01781-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Due to ethnic heterogeneity in genetic architecture, genetic risk score (GRS) constructed within the European population generally possesses poor portability in underrepresented non-European populations, but substantial genetic similarity exists across diverse ancestral groups. We here explore the prediction performance of early exposures and GRS on body mass index (BMI) through leveraging genetic similarity knowledge acquired from Europeans into non-Europeans. We present a linear mixed prediction model for BMI in three distinct UK Biobank cohorts under the transfer learning framework, where we consider Asians (n = 7487) and Africans (n = 7533) as target samples and Europeans (n = 280,575) as informative auxiliary samples. Besides environmental and behavior exposures, we incorporate multiple BMI-related variants, by which the GRS is constructed via transfer machine learning techniques informed by genetic similarity shared across target and auxiliary samples. The use of GRS gained more predictive odds for BMI than the model with traditional risk factors alone in the Asian and African cohorts, leading to an approximately 3.6% and 0.7% accuracy improvement in each target population. After borrowing genetic similarity from Europeans via transfer learning, the R2 increased to 0.270 for Asians and 0.302 for Africans, enhanced by 21.1% and 7.5%, respectively, compared to the early exposure-only models. We also provided evidence for the well-known conclusion that GRS constructed in the European population behaved poorly in non-Europeans. Prediction accuracy is greatly elevated in racial minority or underrepresented populations via the transfer learning method by leveraging shared genetic similarity from informative auxiliary populations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两个少数群体成人肥胖的早期暴露和遗传风险评分的迁移学习预测。
由于遗传结构的种族异质性,在欧洲人群中构建的遗传风险评分(GRS)在代表性不足的非欧洲人群中通常具有较差的可移植性,但不同祖先群体之间存在大量遗传相似性。本文通过利用从欧洲人和非欧洲人身上获得的遗传相似性知识,探讨早期暴露和GRS对体重指数(BMI)的预测性能。在迁移学习框架下,我们在三个不同的UK Biobank队列中提出了BMI的线性混合预测模型,其中我们将亚洲人(n = 7487)和非洲人(n = 7533)作为目标样本,将欧洲人(n = 280,575)作为信息辅助样本。除了环境和行为暴露外,我们还纳入了多个bmi相关变异,通过传递机器学习技术构建GRS,该技术基于目标样本和辅助样本之间共享的遗传相似性。在亚洲和非洲人群中,使用GRS对BMI的预测比单独使用传统风险因素的模型获得了更高的预测几率,导致每个目标人群的准确性分别提高了约3.6%和0.7%。在通过迁移学习借鉴欧洲人的遗传相似性后,亚洲人和非洲人的R2分别增加到0.270和0.302,与早期仅接触的模型相比,分别提高了21.1%和7.5%。我们还为欧洲人构建的GRS在非欧洲人中表现不佳的著名结论提供了证据。通过迁移学习方法,利用来自信息辅助群体的共享遗传相似性,大大提高了少数种族或代表性不足群体的预测准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Prevention Science
Prevention Science PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
11.40%
发文量
128
期刊介绍: Prevention Science is the official publication of the Society for Prevention Research. The Journal serves as an interdisciplinary forum designed to disseminate new developments in the theory, research and practice of prevention. Prevention sciences encompassing etiology, epidemiology and intervention are represented through peer-reviewed original research articles on a variety of health and social problems, including but not limited to substance abuse, mental health, HIV/AIDS, violence, accidents, teenage pregnancy, suicide, delinquency, STD''s, obesity, diet/nutrition, exercise, and chronic illness. The journal also publishes literature reviews, theoretical articles, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, brief reports, replication studies, and papers concerning new developments in methodology.
期刊最新文献
Neighborhood Opportunity and Genetic Literacy in a Representative Sample of US Adults. Multi-level Risk and Protective Factors for Vaping Onset and Escalation Among Youth: a Focus on LGBTQ + Disparities. Diffusion of an Effective Social and Behavioral Change Intervention to Prevent Intimate Partner Violence and Enhance Gender-Equitable Norms in Nepal. Measuring Indigenous Cultural Strengths: a Systematic Review of a Decade of Approaches. Comparing AI-Assisted Coding and Traditional Qualitative Analysis: a Study Examining Differences in Methods and Results of AI-Assisted Coding and Traditional Content Coding Using Community Engagement Data Collected During the Development of a Municipal Food Plan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1