Discrimination Faced by Male Nurses and Male Midwives: A Systematic Review and Meta-Synthesis

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Journal of Clinical Nursing Pub Date : 2025-02-06 DOI:10.1111/jocn.17679
Melanie Li Ling Wong, Siew Lin Serena Koh, Wei Zhou Teo, Kok Wee Eng, Shefaly Shorey
{"title":"Discrimination Faced by Male Nurses and Male Midwives: A Systematic Review and Meta-Synthesis","authors":"Melanie Li Ling Wong,&nbsp;Siew Lin Serena Koh,&nbsp;Wei Zhou Teo,&nbsp;Kok Wee Eng,&nbsp;Shefaly Shorey","doi":"10.1111/jocn.17679","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>To consolidate and appraise available evidence on the experiences and perceptions of male nurses and male midwives facing discrimination.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>Qualitative systematic review. This review was informed by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The Critical Appraisal Skills Program checklist was used to appraise included articles, and extracted data were meta-summarised and meta-synthesised using Sandelowski and Barroso's two-step approach.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Data Sources</h3>\n \n <p>PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, ProQuest (Dissertations and Theses Global) and ClinicalTrials.gov were sourced from the inception to December 2022.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 21 studies were included, involving 283 male nurses and 11 male midwives. Four themes were identified during the meta-synthesis: (1) It's a ‘women's world’, (2) discrimination within and beyond the workplace, (3) stereotypes and labels and (4) the silver lining.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This review offered male nurses' and male midwives' perspectives on discrimination faced in nursing. There is a need to ensure gender equality in the nursing profession by reinforcing the importance and value of employing men in this profession.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications</h3>\n \n <p>Future research should focus on examining the experiences of male nursing students and other healthcare stakeholders to understand discrimination faced by men in nursing from varied geographical and cultural backgrounds. The findings may provide helpful insights for planning supportive interventions, institutional adjustments, legislative changes, educational initiatives and research that benefit male nurses and male midwives.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Impact</h3>\n \n <p>This qualitative systematic review consolidated and meta-synthesised the available evidence on male nurses' and male midwives' experiences of discrimination. These findings contribute to the understanding of male nurses and male midwives as a gender minority and the need for greater gender equality.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Reporting Method</h3>\n \n <p>PRISMA.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patient or Public Contribution</h3>\n \n <p>No patient or public contribution.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","volume":"34 6","pages":"2431-2446"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jocn.17679","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

To consolidate and appraise available evidence on the experiences and perceptions of male nurses and male midwives facing discrimination.

Design

Qualitative systematic review. This review was informed by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA).

Methods

The Critical Appraisal Skills Program checklist was used to appraise included articles, and extracted data were meta-summarised and meta-synthesised using Sandelowski and Barroso's two-step approach.

Data Sources

PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, ProQuest (Dissertations and Theses Global) and ClinicalTrials.gov were sourced from the inception to December 2022.

Results

A total of 21 studies were included, involving 283 male nurses and 11 male midwives. Four themes were identified during the meta-synthesis: (1) It's a ‘women's world’, (2) discrimination within and beyond the workplace, (3) stereotypes and labels and (4) the silver lining.

Conclusion

This review offered male nurses' and male midwives' perspectives on discrimination faced in nursing. There is a need to ensure gender equality in the nursing profession by reinforcing the importance and value of employing men in this profession.

Implications

Future research should focus on examining the experiences of male nursing students and other healthcare stakeholders to understand discrimination faced by men in nursing from varied geographical and cultural backgrounds. The findings may provide helpful insights for planning supportive interventions, institutional adjustments, legislative changes, educational initiatives and research that benefit male nurses and male midwives.

Impact

This qualitative systematic review consolidated and meta-synthesised the available evidence on male nurses' and male midwives' experiences of discrimination. These findings contribute to the understanding of male nurses and male midwives as a gender minority and the need for greater gender equality.

Reporting Method

PRISMA.

Patient or Public Contribution

No patient or public contribution.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
男护士和男助产士面临的歧视:系统回顾和综合。
目的:对男护士和男助产士面临歧视的经验和看法进行整合和评估。设计:定性系统评价。本综述由系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)提供信息。方法:采用Critical Appraisal Skills Program检查表对纳入的文章进行评估,并采用Sandelowski和Barroso的两步法对提取的数据进行meta汇总和meta综合。数据来源:PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, ProQuest (Dissertations and Theses Global)和ClinicalTrials.gov,从研究开始到2022年12月。结果:共纳入21项研究,涉及283名男护士和11名男助产士。在综合过程中确定了四个主题:(1)这是一个“女性的世界”,(2)工作场所内外的歧视,(3)刻板印象和标签,(4)一线希望。结论:本综述提供了男性护士和男性助产士在护理中面临歧视的观点。有必要通过强调在护理专业中雇用男子的重要性和价值来确保护理专业中的性别平等。启示:未来的研究应侧重于检查男性护生和其他医疗保健利益相关者的经历,以了解来自不同地理和文化背景的男性在护理中面临的歧视。研究结果可能为规划支持性干预措施、制度调整、立法改革、教育倡议和研究提供有益的见解,使男性护士和男性助产士受益。影响:这一定性系统综述整合并综合了关于男护士和男助产士歧视经历的现有证据。这些发现有助于理解男护士和男助产士作为性别少数群体,以及促进性别平等的必要性。报告方式:PRISMA。患者或公众捐款:没有患者或公众捐款。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Nursing (JCN) is an international, peer reviewed, scientific journal that seeks to promote the development and exchange of knowledge that is directly relevant to all spheres of nursing practice. The primary aim is to promote a high standard of clinically related scholarship which advances and supports the practice and discipline of nursing. The Journal also aims to promote the international exchange of ideas and experience that draws from the different cultures in which practice takes place. Further, JCN seeks to enrich insight into clinical need and the implications for nursing intervention and models of service delivery. Emphasis is placed on promoting critical debate on the art and science of nursing practice. JCN is essential reading for anyone involved in nursing practice, whether clinicians, researchers, educators, managers, policy makers, or students. The development of clinical practice and the changing patterns of inter-professional working are also central to JCN''s scope of interest. Contributions are welcomed from other health professionals on issues that have a direct impact on nursing practice. We publish high quality papers from across the methodological spectrum that make an important and novel contribution to the field of clinical nursing (regardless of where care is provided), and which demonstrate clinical application and international relevance.
期刊最新文献
Comment Letter on 'Siblings of Children With Cancer and Their Challenges Across Everyday Life Contexts: A Two-Phase Qualitative Study in Denmark'. From Laboratory to Bedside: Technical Enhancements for Clinical-Grade AI Wound Assessment Systems. Beyond Borders: Diaspora Nurses' Voices on Retention, Respect and Resilience. Confidential Conversations in Palliative Care: An Ethnographic Exploration of Trust and Interpersonal Relationship Between Nurse and Patient. Factors Influencing Cardiac Rehabilitation Intention in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease: A Qualitative Study Based on the Reasoned Action Approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1