The impact of hidden curriculum factors on professional adaptability.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH BMC Medical Education Pub Date : 2025-02-05 DOI:10.1186/s12909-024-06618-1
Danial Behmanesh, Shahram Jalilian, Akbar Babaei Heydarabadi, Mehrnaz Ahmadi, Nasrin Khajeali
{"title":"The impact of hidden curriculum factors on professional adaptability.","authors":"Danial Behmanesh, Shahram Jalilian, Akbar Babaei Heydarabadi, Mehrnaz Ahmadi, Nasrin Khajeali","doi":"10.1186/s12909-024-06618-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The hidden curriculum encompasses the underlying values, norms, and behaviors conveyed indirectly through educational environments, significantly shaping medical students' professional adaptability. This study addresses the research gap in understanding the relationship between hidden curriculum components and professional adaptability among medical students at Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences. The innovation lies in quantifying this relationship using robust statistical methods. The objective was to evaluate how these hidden curriculum elements impact students' ability to adapt professionally.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study involved 882 medical students, with a final sample size determined via Morgan's table, including 216 medical student during clerkship and 216 during internship,selected through census sampling. Data were collected using validated professional adaptability and hidden curriculum questionnaires and analyzed using Pearson correlation coefficients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Critical thinking showed the highest correlation with professional adaptability (r = 0.942, p < 0.001), followed by teaching methods (r = 0.874, p < 0.001). supportive environments (r = 0.809, p < 0.001) and Student-teacher interactions (r = 0.781, p < 0.001) also exhibited strong positive relationships. Other components, such as curriculum content and administrative structure, demonstrated moderate correlations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings underscore the importance of the hidden curriculum in enhancing educational quality and professional training in medical education, highlighting the necessity for educators to integrate these elements consciously into their teaching strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":51234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Education","volume":"25 1","pages":"186"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11795987/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06618-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The hidden curriculum encompasses the underlying values, norms, and behaviors conveyed indirectly through educational environments, significantly shaping medical students' professional adaptability. This study addresses the research gap in understanding the relationship between hidden curriculum components and professional adaptability among medical students at Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences. The innovation lies in quantifying this relationship using robust statistical methods. The objective was to evaluate how these hidden curriculum elements impact students' ability to adapt professionally.

Methods: This cross-sectional study involved 882 medical students, with a final sample size determined via Morgan's table, including 216 medical student during clerkship and 216 during internship,selected through census sampling. Data were collected using validated professional adaptability and hidden curriculum questionnaires and analyzed using Pearson correlation coefficients.

Results: Critical thinking showed the highest correlation with professional adaptability (r = 0.942, p < 0.001), followed by teaching methods (r = 0.874, p < 0.001). supportive environments (r = 0.809, p < 0.001) and Student-teacher interactions (r = 0.781, p < 0.001) also exhibited strong positive relationships. Other components, such as curriculum content and administrative structure, demonstrated moderate correlations.

Conclusion: These findings underscore the importance of the hidden curriculum in enhancing educational quality and professional training in medical education, highlighting the necessity for educators to integrate these elements consciously into their teaching strategies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medical Education
BMC Medical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
795
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Education is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the training of healthcare professionals, including undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing education. The journal has a special focus on curriculum development, evaluations of performance, assessment of training needs and evidence-based medicine.
期刊最新文献
The construction of a psychometric instrument for the educational role enactment of attending physicians in teaching hospitals. AI versus human-generated multiple-choice questions for medical education: a cohort study in a high-stakes examination. Assessment of students' ability to represent determinants of health and health systems science content on concept maps in a pre-clerkship curriculum. Enhancing collaborative clinical reasoning among multidisciplinary healthcare teams in a neurosurgery ICU: insights from video-reflexive ethnography. Exploring medical students' intention to use of ChatGPT from a programming course: a grounded theory study in China.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1