Enhancing collaborative clinical reasoning among multidisciplinary healthcare teams in a neurosurgery ICU: insights from video-reflexive ethnography.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH BMC Medical Education Pub Date : 2025-02-08 DOI:10.1186/s12909-025-06782-y
Ching-Yi Lee, Ching-Hsin Lee, Sze-Yuen Yau, Hung-Yi Lai, Po-Jui Chen, Mi-Mi Chen
{"title":"Enhancing collaborative clinical reasoning among multidisciplinary healthcare teams in a neurosurgery ICU: insights from video-reflexive ethnography.","authors":"Ching-Yi Lee, Ching-Hsin Lee, Sze-Yuen Yau, Hung-Yi Lai, Po-Jui Chen, Mi-Mi Chen","doi":"10.1186/s12909-025-06782-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical reasoning is a critical skill for healthcare professionals, vital for making accurate diagnoses and effective treatment decisions. This study focuses on enhancing collaborative clinical reasoning (CCR) among multidisciplinary healthcare teams in a neurosurgery intensive care unit (NICU) in Taiwan. The study utilizes video-reflexive ethnography (VRE) to examine the factors influencing CCR, the cognitive processes involved, and the efficacy of VRE in promoting CCR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study employed a qualitative research design, utilizing VRE. Participants included 17 healthcare professionals from a NICU, comprising attending physicians, residents, nurses, and respiratory therapists. Data collection involved video recordings of daily ward rounds, field observations, and reflexive interviews where participants reviewed video clips of their interactions. Thematic analysis was conducted on the transcripts of video recordings and interview.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thematic analysis revealed seven key themes in CCR: information sharing, active verbal and behavioral information gathering, information processing and recall, modification and discussion, short-term indications, and management plans and goals. Information sharing was fundamental, with team members frequently exchanging patient data to ensure a common understanding. Active information gathering, both verbal and behavioral, was crucial for obtaining real-time patient insights. Cognitive processing involved synthesizing data to form initial hypotheses, while modification and discussion highlighted the iterative nature of CCR.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study underscores the importance of effective communication, active information gathering, and iterative discussions in enhancing CCR. VRE proved to be a valuable tool for promoting self-awareness and continuous improvement among healthcare teams. The findings suggest that education programs should focus on developing teamwork and communication skills, and interventions should aim to optimize information flow and foster a culture of open communication. By enhancing CCR, healthcare teams can improve patient outcomes and ensure safer healthcare delivery.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not required, as this is not a clinical trial and does not involve any healthcare interventions with human participants.</p>","PeriodicalId":51234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Education","volume":"25 1","pages":"207"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11806538/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-06782-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Clinical reasoning is a critical skill for healthcare professionals, vital for making accurate diagnoses and effective treatment decisions. This study focuses on enhancing collaborative clinical reasoning (CCR) among multidisciplinary healthcare teams in a neurosurgery intensive care unit (NICU) in Taiwan. The study utilizes video-reflexive ethnography (VRE) to examine the factors influencing CCR, the cognitive processes involved, and the efficacy of VRE in promoting CCR.

Methods: The study employed a qualitative research design, utilizing VRE. Participants included 17 healthcare professionals from a NICU, comprising attending physicians, residents, nurses, and respiratory therapists. Data collection involved video recordings of daily ward rounds, field observations, and reflexive interviews where participants reviewed video clips of their interactions. Thematic analysis was conducted on the transcripts of video recordings and interview.

Results: Thematic analysis revealed seven key themes in CCR: information sharing, active verbal and behavioral information gathering, information processing and recall, modification and discussion, short-term indications, and management plans and goals. Information sharing was fundamental, with team members frequently exchanging patient data to ensure a common understanding. Active information gathering, both verbal and behavioral, was crucial for obtaining real-time patient insights. Cognitive processing involved synthesizing data to form initial hypotheses, while modification and discussion highlighted the iterative nature of CCR.

Conclusions: This study underscores the importance of effective communication, active information gathering, and iterative discussions in enhancing CCR. VRE proved to be a valuable tool for promoting self-awareness and continuous improvement among healthcare teams. The findings suggest that education programs should focus on developing teamwork and communication skills, and interventions should aim to optimize information flow and foster a culture of open communication. By enhancing CCR, healthcare teams can improve patient outcomes and ensure safer healthcare delivery.

Clinical trial number: Not required, as this is not a clinical trial and does not involve any healthcare interventions with human participants.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加强神经外科ICU多学科医疗团队之间的协作临床推理:来自视频反射民族志的见解。
背景:临床推理是医疗保健专业人员的一项关键技能,对于做出准确诊断和有效治疗决策至关重要。本研究旨在探讨台湾某神经外科加护病房(NICU)多学科医疗团队间的协同临床推理(CCR)。本研究利用视频反射性人种志(video-reflexive ethnography, VRE)研究影响CCR的因素、涉及的认知过程,以及VRE促进CCR的效果。方法:本研究采用质性研究设计,采用VRE。参与者包括来自NICU的17名医护专业人员,包括主治医生、住院医师、护士和呼吸治疗师。数据收集包括每日查房录像、实地观察和反身性访谈,参与者回顾他们互动的视频片段。对录像和访谈笔录进行了专题分析。结果:主题分析揭示了CCR的七个关键主题:信息共享、主动语言和行为信息收集、信息加工和回忆、修改和讨论、短期适应症、管理计划和目标。信息共享是最基本的,团队成员经常交换患者数据,以确保达成共识。积极的信息收集,无论是口头的还是行为的,对于获得实时的患者洞察是至关重要的。认知加工涉及综合数据以形成初始假设,而修改和讨论则突出了CCR的迭代性质。结论:本研究强调了有效的沟通、积极的信息收集和反复讨论对提高CCR的重要性。事实证明,VRE是促进医疗团队自我意识和持续改进的宝贵工具。研究结果表明,教育计划应侧重于培养团队合作和沟通技巧,干预措施应以优化信息流和培养开放沟通的文化为目标。通过增强CCR,医疗保健团队可以改善患者的治疗效果,并确保更安全的医疗保健服务。临床试验编号:不需要,因为这不是临床试验,不涉及人类参与者的任何医疗保健干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medical Education
BMC Medical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
795
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Education is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the training of healthcare professionals, including undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing education. The journal has a special focus on curriculum development, evaluations of performance, assessment of training needs and evidence-based medicine.
期刊最新文献
The relationship between sleep quality and academic achievement among students in health-related disciplines: a cross-sectional study. Acceptability and feasibility of a faculty development programme for medical and dental academics in Ghana. Exploring contextual demands that challenge nursing students in their self-directed learning of bioscience: a comparative qualitative content analysis. Case-based in-person teaching improves self-directed mastery of the MDS-UPDRS motor scoring. The educational outcomes of medical student engagement in research projects: a scoping review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1