Comprehensive intercomparison of Martian dust optical depth datasets to assess agreement with Mars Climate Sounder observations

IF 1.8 4区 物理与天体物理 Q3 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS Planetary and Space Science Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.pss.2025.106035
N.T. Martin , A. Kleinböhl , M. Slipski , H.E. Gillespie , J.H. Shirley , M.J. Wolff , M.D. Smith
{"title":"Comprehensive intercomparison of Martian dust optical depth datasets to assess agreement with Mars Climate Sounder observations","authors":"N.T. Martin ,&nbsp;A. Kleinböhl ,&nbsp;M. Slipski ,&nbsp;H.E. Gillespie ,&nbsp;J.H. Shirley ,&nbsp;M.J. Wolff ,&nbsp;M.D. Smith","doi":"10.1016/j.pss.2025.106035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study provides comprehensive intercomparisons of dust optical depths derived from Mars Climate Sounder on Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter with measurements from the orbiter instruments THEMIS on Mars Odyssey, CRISM on Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter, EMIRS on the Emirates Mars Mission, and from the surface-based instruments Pancam on the Spirit and Opportunity rovers and SSI on the Phoenix lander. We demonstrate good overall agreement between these dust optical depth datasets, in particular as these measurements were taken at different wavelengths (near IR to thermal IR) and with different measurement geometries (limb, downlooking from orbit, uplooking from the surface). To draw our conclusions, we use direct comparisons of co-located measurements from these instruments, plots of the dust optical depth differences averaged by latitude and Solar longitude, as well as modified Bland–Altman analysis that takes the measurement uncertainties into account. From the Bland–Altman analysis, we find that error estimates provided by the instruments reasonably represent the variability introduced by the two datasets but do not capture offsets. Based on our investigations, we propose potential physical causes, such as surface reflectance factor estimation and thermal contrast, for some of the observed differences. We find a linear relation of the differences in dust optical depth between MCS and the other instruments with derived MCS water ice optical depth. Taking this relation into account, together with a constant parameter that accounts for general offsets between the datasets, significantly reduces differences.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20054,"journal":{"name":"Planetary and Space Science","volume":"256 ","pages":"Article 106035"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Planetary and Space Science","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032063325000029","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study provides comprehensive intercomparisons of dust optical depths derived from Mars Climate Sounder on Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter with measurements from the orbiter instruments THEMIS on Mars Odyssey, CRISM on Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter, EMIRS on the Emirates Mars Mission, and from the surface-based instruments Pancam on the Spirit and Opportunity rovers and SSI on the Phoenix lander. We demonstrate good overall agreement between these dust optical depth datasets, in particular as these measurements were taken at different wavelengths (near IR to thermal IR) and with different measurement geometries (limb, downlooking from orbit, uplooking from the surface). To draw our conclusions, we use direct comparisons of co-located measurements from these instruments, plots of the dust optical depth differences averaged by latitude and Solar longitude, as well as modified Bland–Altman analysis that takes the measurement uncertainties into account. From the Bland–Altman analysis, we find that error estimates provided by the instruments reasonably represent the variability introduced by the two datasets but do not capture offsets. Based on our investigations, we propose potential physical causes, such as surface reflectance factor estimation and thermal contrast, for some of the observed differences. We find a linear relation of the differences in dust optical depth between MCS and the other instruments with derived MCS water ice optical depth. Taking this relation into account, together with a constant parameter that accounts for general offsets between the datasets, significantly reduces differences.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Planetary and Space Science
Planetary and Space Science 地学天文-天文与天体物理
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
126
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Planetary and Space Science publishes original articles as well as short communications (letters). Ground-based and space-borne instrumentation and laboratory simulation of solar system processes are included. The following fields of planetary and solar system research are covered: • Celestial mechanics, including dynamical evolution of the solar system, gravitational captures and resonances, relativistic effects, tracking and dynamics • Cosmochemistry and origin, including all aspects of the formation and initial physical and chemical evolution of the solar system • Terrestrial planets and satellites, including the physics of the interiors, geology and morphology of the surfaces, tectonics, mineralogy and dating • Outer planets and satellites, including formation and evolution, remote sensing at all wavelengths and in situ measurements • Planetary atmospheres, including formation and evolution, circulation and meteorology, boundary layers, remote sensing and laboratory simulation • Planetary magnetospheres and ionospheres, including origin of magnetic fields, magnetospheric plasma and radiation belts, and their interaction with the sun, the solar wind and satellites • Small bodies, dust and rings, including asteroids, comets and zodiacal light and their interaction with the solar radiation and the solar wind • Exobiology, including origin of life, detection of planetary ecosystems and pre-biological phenomena in the solar system and laboratory simulations • Extrasolar systems, including the detection and/or the detectability of exoplanets and planetary systems, their formation and evolution, the physical and chemical properties of the exoplanets • History of planetary and space research
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Optimal choice of closest approach distance for a comet flyby: Application to the Comet Interceptor mission Compositional mapping and geological age of the mare basalts of the southern quadrangle of Moon Comprehensive intercomparison of Martian dust optical depth datasets to assess agreement with Mars Climate Sounder observations Practical exogeoconservation of Mars: Lessons from the Mars Desert Research Station, Utah
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1