The evolution to Industry 5.0 / Safety 5.0, the developments in society, and implications for industry management

Hans J. Pasman , Stewart W. Behie
{"title":"The evolution to Industry 5.0 / Safety 5.0, the developments in society, and implications for industry management","authors":"Hans J. Pasman ,&nbsp;Stewart W. Behie","doi":"10.1016/j.jsasus.2024.11.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>It was only a few years ago that the manufacturing industry trend became one of digitalization and automation, known as Industry 4.0, the fourth industrial revolution. It also led to additional safety measures: Safety 4.0. Simultaneously in society, awareness grew that humanity for its future should foster sustainable processes, while safety and resilience became higher valued. This development is enhanced by climate change phenomena causing energy transition. Due to these and other cultural changes, the inflow of younger generations of workers with new attitudes, and severe economic pressures, industry managements are confronted by these dynamics with many issues, of which the study presents a sketch. Also, due to the developing tension between artificial intelligence-steered processes and human control, lately, Industry 5.0 has developed with an emphasis on human factors in which robots shall turn into collaborating “cobots”. In the new work environment, threats to the worker change from being of a physical nature to stress. This triggers a Safety 5.0 development with, among others, a human digital twin as an intermediate monitoring device between a human operator and a cobot. Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) reporting by industry puts emphasis on activities that stimulate sustainability, which is related but different from vulnerability reduction and enhanced resilience to unexpected disruption threats. The value of the study is not the improvement of a method or an approach but rather a sketch of the diversity of concepts and complexity the industry faces when it wants to stay healthy and strives for the safety and sustainability that society likes to see.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100831,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Safety and Sustainability","volume":"1 4","pages":"Pages 202-211"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Safety and Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949926724000477","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It was only a few years ago that the manufacturing industry trend became one of digitalization and automation, known as Industry 4.0, the fourth industrial revolution. It also led to additional safety measures: Safety 4.0. Simultaneously in society, awareness grew that humanity for its future should foster sustainable processes, while safety and resilience became higher valued. This development is enhanced by climate change phenomena causing energy transition. Due to these and other cultural changes, the inflow of younger generations of workers with new attitudes, and severe economic pressures, industry managements are confronted by these dynamics with many issues, of which the study presents a sketch. Also, due to the developing tension between artificial intelligence-steered processes and human control, lately, Industry 5.0 has developed with an emphasis on human factors in which robots shall turn into collaborating “cobots”. In the new work environment, threats to the worker change from being of a physical nature to stress. This triggers a Safety 5.0 development with, among others, a human digital twin as an intermediate monitoring device between a human operator and a cobot. Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) reporting by industry puts emphasis on activities that stimulate sustainability, which is related but different from vulnerability reduction and enhanced resilience to unexpected disruption threats. The value of the study is not the improvement of a method or an approach but rather a sketch of the diversity of concepts and complexity the industry faces when it wants to stay healthy and strives for the safety and sustainability that society likes to see.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Member Accident causation analysis of metal processing plants based on questionnaire and Bayesian network A maturity model of occupational safety and health in industry 4.0: An analysis in Brazilian organizations Ergonomic adequacy of university tablet armchairs for male and female: A multigroup item response theory analysis The evolution to Industry 5.0 / Safety 5.0, the developments in society, and implications for industry management
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1