Production of MWCNTs from plastic wastes: Method selection through Multi-Criteria Decision-Making techniques

IF 6.3 3区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-05 DOI:10.1016/j.jtice.2025.106000
Prabakar P , L N Sajith , Sivagami K , Kavindra A I , Muruganandam L , Samarshi Chakraborty
{"title":"Production of MWCNTs from plastic wastes: Method selection through Multi-Criteria Decision-Making techniques","authors":"Prabakar P ,&nbsp;L N Sajith ,&nbsp;Sivagami K ,&nbsp;Kavindra A I ,&nbsp;Muruganandam L ,&nbsp;Samarshi Chakraborty","doi":"10.1016/j.jtice.2025.106000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The global challenge of plastic waste generation warrants innovative, cost-effective, sustainable, and scalable solutions. Conversion of different non-recyclable plastic waste into value-added products (waste to wealth) such as carbon nanotubes (CNTs), graphene, carbon black, etc. holds significant promise in the waste management/valorization sectors with economic viability. This study focuses on identifying the optimal method for producing multiwall carbon nanotubes (MWCNT) from plastic wastes from several popular MWCNT synthesis methods such as chemical vapor deposition, pyrolysis, spray pyrolysis, gasification, microwave-assisted pyrolysis, etc.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The authors implemented Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) techniques. They ranked different MWCNT production methods from waste plastic based on several operational, economic, and qualitative parameters, including raw material cost, operating temperature, reaction time, pressure, production yield, and MWCNT diameter. MCDM methods like TOPSIS, Grey Relational Analysis, and Simple Additive Weighting rank different synthesis processes.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>MCDM analysis performed using subjective and objective criteria weighting concluded that gasification is the most sustainable and cost-effective method having a high assessment score above 0.9 for MWCNT production. In contrast, pyrolysis and spray pyrolysis are the least favoured options with an assessment score ranging between 0.3 to 0.6. The current research provides a clear roadmap for developing a sustainable, economically viable solution for plastic waste valorization. It also helps us to find sustainable and efficient MWCNT manufacturing techniques from non-recyclable plastic waste that have the potential to pave the way for greener sustainable waste management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":381,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers","volume":"169 ","pages":"Article 106000"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876107025000513","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The global challenge of plastic waste generation warrants innovative, cost-effective, sustainable, and scalable solutions. Conversion of different non-recyclable plastic waste into value-added products (waste to wealth) such as carbon nanotubes (CNTs), graphene, carbon black, etc. holds significant promise in the waste management/valorization sectors with economic viability. This study focuses on identifying the optimal method for producing multiwall carbon nanotubes (MWCNT) from plastic wastes from several popular MWCNT synthesis methods such as chemical vapor deposition, pyrolysis, spray pyrolysis, gasification, microwave-assisted pyrolysis, etc.

Methods

The authors implemented Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) techniques. They ranked different MWCNT production methods from waste plastic based on several operational, economic, and qualitative parameters, including raw material cost, operating temperature, reaction time, pressure, production yield, and MWCNT diameter. MCDM methods like TOPSIS, Grey Relational Analysis, and Simple Additive Weighting rank different synthesis processes.

Findings

MCDM analysis performed using subjective and objective criteria weighting concluded that gasification is the most sustainable and cost-effective method having a high assessment score above 0.9 for MWCNT production. In contrast, pyrolysis and spray pyrolysis are the least favoured options with an assessment score ranging between 0.3 to 0.6. The current research provides a clear roadmap for developing a sustainable, economically viable solution for plastic waste valorization. It also helps us to find sustainable and efficient MWCNT manufacturing techniques from non-recyclable plastic waste that have the potential to pave the way for greener sustainable waste management.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从塑料废物中生产MWCNTs:通过多标准决策技术选择方法
塑料垃圾产生的全球性挑战需要创新的、具有成本效益的、可持续的和可扩展的解决方案。将不同的不可回收塑料废物转化为增值产品(废物转化财富),如碳纳米管(CNTs)、石墨烯、炭黑等,在具有经济可行性的废物管理/增值部门具有重大前景。通过化学气相沉积法、热解法、喷雾热解法、气化法、微波辅助热解法等几种常用的多壁碳纳米管合成方法,对塑料废弃物制备多壁碳纳米管(MWCNT)进行了优选。他们根据几个操作、经济和定性参数,包括原材料成本、操作温度、反应时间、压力、产量和MWCNT直径,对废塑料生产MWCNT的不同方法进行了排名。TOPSIS、灰色关联分析和简单加性加权等MCDM方法对不同的合成过程进行排序。使用主观和客观标准加权进行的smcdm分析得出结论,气化是最具可持续性和成本效益的方法,对于MWCNT生产具有高于0.9的高评估分数。相比之下,热解和喷雾热解是最不受欢迎的选择,评估得分在0.3到0.6之间。目前的研究为开发可持续的、经济上可行的塑料废物增值解决方案提供了清晰的路线图。它还帮助我们从不可回收的塑料废物中找到可持续和高效的MWCNT制造技术,这些技术有可能为更绿色的可持续废物管理铺平道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
14.00%
发文量
362
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers (formerly known as Journal of the Chinese Institute of Chemical Engineers) publishes original works, from fundamental principles to practical applications, in the broad field of chemical engineering with special focus on three aspects: Chemical and Biomolecular Science and Technology, Energy and Environmental Science and Technology, and Materials Science and Technology. Authors should choose for their manuscript an appropriate aspect section and a few related classifications when submitting to the journal online.
期刊最新文献
Sunlight-induced Z-scheme configuration of cube-on-flower-like ZnSnO3/BiOBr0.5Cl0.5 with notable photocatalytic removal of hospital effluents: Co-precipitation-coupled sono-solvothermal manner Creating active pure water from salty water harvesting solar energy-irradiated renewable photocatalysts MIL-101(Cr)-regulated interfacial engineering of thin-film composite forward osmosis membrane for enhanced phosphorus removal One-pot hydrothermal synthesis of TiO2/UiO-67 for highly efficient photocatalytic degradation of Rhodamine B A manuscript submitted to Journal of the Taiwan Institute of chemical engineers enhancing photoautotrophic fucoxanthin production in Pavlova sp. by modulating light regimes, seawater sources, and nitrogen levels
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1