Neglected giant bladder stone with bilateral ureteral stones: A case report of staged surgical treatment

Iwan Purnomo Aji , Johan Renaldo , Dimas Panca Andhika
{"title":"Neglected giant bladder stone with bilateral ureteral stones: A case report of staged surgical treatment","authors":"Iwan Purnomo Aji ,&nbsp;Johan Renaldo ,&nbsp;Dimas Panca Andhika","doi":"10.1016/j.ijscr.2025.110933","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction and importance</h3><div>A giant bladder stone is a rare urological condition in which a massive stone forms due to various contributing factors. We present a rare case of a giant bladder stone with concurrent ureteral stones, detailing its staged surgical management and relevant literature.</div></div><div><h3>Case presentation</h3><div>A 44-year-old male presented with right flank, left flank, and suprapubic pain for one month prior to admission, accompanied by dysuria and a history of stones passage through the urinary tract. On examination, the patient presented with suprapubic pain, and laboratory results revealed severe anemia with elevated blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and serum creatinine levels. A vesicolithotomy was performed, followed by ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URS) one month later. A 15 × 10 cm bladder stone was found during the first surgery, and multiple ureteral stones were discovered during the second surgery. After surgery, the patient improved BUN (93.5 mg/dL to 27.6 mg/dL), serum creatinine (8.11 mg/dL to 1.85 mg/dL), and reduced flank and suprapubic pain.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical discussion</h3><div>The management of giant bladder stones involves open vesicolithotomy, which is considered the gold standard for complete removal, as AUA and EAU guidelines recommend. A subsequent URS for the removal of bilateral ureteral stones provides a favorable outcome for the patient.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>A holistic approach for giant bladder stones is required, encompassing diagnosis and surgical planning to minimize misdiagnosis and complications. A staged surgical approach, including vesicolithotomy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy, may be beneficial.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48113,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Surgery Case Reports","volume":"128 ","pages":"Article 110933"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Surgery Case Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210261225001191","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and importance

A giant bladder stone is a rare urological condition in which a massive stone forms due to various contributing factors. We present a rare case of a giant bladder stone with concurrent ureteral stones, detailing its staged surgical management and relevant literature.

Case presentation

A 44-year-old male presented with right flank, left flank, and suprapubic pain for one month prior to admission, accompanied by dysuria and a history of stones passage through the urinary tract. On examination, the patient presented with suprapubic pain, and laboratory results revealed severe anemia with elevated blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and serum creatinine levels. A vesicolithotomy was performed, followed by ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URS) one month later. A 15 × 10 cm bladder stone was found during the first surgery, and multiple ureteral stones were discovered during the second surgery. After surgery, the patient improved BUN (93.5 mg/dL to 27.6 mg/dL), serum creatinine (8.11 mg/dL to 1.85 mg/dL), and reduced flank and suprapubic pain.

Clinical discussion

The management of giant bladder stones involves open vesicolithotomy, which is considered the gold standard for complete removal, as AUA and EAU guidelines recommend. A subsequent URS for the removal of bilateral ureteral stones provides a favorable outcome for the patient.

Conclusion

A holistic approach for giant bladder stones is required, encompassing diagnosis and surgical planning to minimize misdiagnosis and complications. A staged surgical approach, including vesicolithotomy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy, may be beneficial.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1116
审稿时长
46 days
期刊最新文献
Rhinolithiasis, an unusual cause of nasal discharge: A case report Comments on “Spontaneous splenic rupture: A rare complication of concurrent malaria and dengue infections – A case report” Renal cell carcinoma in a horseshoe kidney: A case report Bedside management of a knotted Swan-Ganz catheter – A case report and literature review Neglected giant bladder stone with bilateral ureteral stones: A case report of staged surgical treatment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1