Combining machine learning algorithms for bridging gaps in GRACE and GRACE Follow-On missions using ERA5-Land reanalysis

IF 5.7 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Science of Remote Sensing Pub Date : 2025-01-25 DOI:10.1016/j.srs.2025.100198
Jaydeo K. Dharpure , Ian M. Howat , Saurabh Kaushik , Bryan G. Mark
{"title":"Combining machine learning algorithms for bridging gaps in GRACE and GRACE Follow-On missions using ERA5-Land reanalysis","authors":"Jaydeo K. Dharpure ,&nbsp;Ian M. Howat ,&nbsp;Saurabh Kaushik ,&nbsp;Bryan G. Mark","doi":"10.1016/j.srs.2025.100198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) and GRACE Follow-On (GFO) missions have provided valuable data for monitoring global terrestrial water storage anomalies (TWSA) over the past two decades. However, the nearly one-year gap between these missions pose challenges for long-term TWSA measurements and various applications. Unlike previous studies, we use a combination of Machine Learning (ML) methods—Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGB), Deep Neural Network (DNN), and Stacked Long-Short Term Memory (SLSTM)—to identify and efficiently bridge the gap between GRACE and GFO by using the best-performing ML model to estimate TWSA at each grid cell. The models were trained using six hydroclimatic variables (temperature, precipitation, runoff, evapotranspiration, ERA5-Land derived TWSA, and cumulative water storage change), as well as a vegetation index and timing variables, to reconstruct global land TWSA at 0.5° grid resolution. We evaluated the performance of each model using Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE), Pearson's Correlation Coefficient (PCC), and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE). Our results demonstrate test accuracy with area weighted average NSE, PCC, and RMSE of 0.51 ± 0.31, 0.71 ± 0.23, and 4.75 ± 3.63 cm, respectively. The model's performance was further compared across five climatic zones, with two previously reconstructed products (Li and Humphrey methods) at 26 major river basins, during flood/drought events, and for sea-level rise. Our results showcase the model's superior performance and its capability to accurately predict data gaps at both grid and basin scales globally.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101147,"journal":{"name":"Science of Remote Sensing","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 100198"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science of Remote Sensing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666017225000045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) and GRACE Follow-On (GFO) missions have provided valuable data for monitoring global terrestrial water storage anomalies (TWSA) over the past two decades. However, the nearly one-year gap between these missions pose challenges for long-term TWSA measurements and various applications. Unlike previous studies, we use a combination of Machine Learning (ML) methods—Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGB), Deep Neural Network (DNN), and Stacked Long-Short Term Memory (SLSTM)—to identify and efficiently bridge the gap between GRACE and GFO by using the best-performing ML model to estimate TWSA at each grid cell. The models were trained using six hydroclimatic variables (temperature, precipitation, runoff, evapotranspiration, ERA5-Land derived TWSA, and cumulative water storage change), as well as a vegetation index and timing variables, to reconstruct global land TWSA at 0.5° grid resolution. We evaluated the performance of each model using Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE), Pearson's Correlation Coefficient (PCC), and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE). Our results demonstrate test accuracy with area weighted average NSE, PCC, and RMSE of 0.51 ± 0.31, 0.71 ± 0.23, and 4.75 ± 3.63 cm, respectively. The model's performance was further compared across five climatic zones, with two previously reconstructed products (Li and Humphrey methods) at 26 major river basins, during flood/drought events, and for sea-level rise. Our results showcase the model's superior performance and its capability to accurately predict data gaps at both grid and basin scales globally.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Volatility characteristics and hyperspectral-based detection models of diesel in soils Combining machine learning algorithms for bridging gaps in GRACE and GRACE Follow-On missions using ERA5-Land reanalysis Investigating the contribution of understory to radiative transfer simulations through reconstructing 3-D realistic temperate broadleaf forest scenes based on multi-platform laser scanning Using airborne LiDAR and enhanced-geolocated GEDI metrics to map structural traits over a Mediterranean forest ForestAlign: Automatic forest structure-based alignment for multi-view TLS and ALS point clouds
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1