Combining machine learning algorithms for bridging gaps in GRACE and GRACE Follow-On missions using ERA5-Land reanalysis

IF 5.2 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Science of Remote Sensing Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-25 DOI:10.1016/j.srs.2025.100198
Jaydeo K. Dharpure , Ian M. Howat , Saurabh Kaushik , Bryan G. Mark
{"title":"Combining machine learning algorithms for bridging gaps in GRACE and GRACE Follow-On missions using ERA5-Land reanalysis","authors":"Jaydeo K. Dharpure ,&nbsp;Ian M. Howat ,&nbsp;Saurabh Kaushik ,&nbsp;Bryan G. Mark","doi":"10.1016/j.srs.2025.100198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) and GRACE Follow-On (GFO) missions have provided valuable data for monitoring global terrestrial water storage anomalies (TWSA) over the past two decades. However, the nearly one-year gap between these missions pose challenges for long-term TWSA measurements and various applications. Unlike previous studies, we use a combination of Machine Learning (ML) methods—Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGB), Deep Neural Network (DNN), and Stacked Long-Short Term Memory (SLSTM)—to identify and efficiently bridge the gap between GRACE and GFO by using the best-performing ML model to estimate TWSA at each grid cell. The models were trained using six hydroclimatic variables (temperature, precipitation, runoff, evapotranspiration, ERA5-Land derived TWSA, and cumulative water storage change), as well as a vegetation index and timing variables, to reconstruct global land TWSA at 0.5° grid resolution. We evaluated the performance of each model using Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE), Pearson's Correlation Coefficient (PCC), and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE). Our results demonstrate test accuracy with area weighted average NSE, PCC, and RMSE of 0.51 ± 0.31, 0.71 ± 0.23, and 4.75 ± 3.63 cm, respectively. The model's performance was further compared across five climatic zones, with two previously reconstructed products (Li and Humphrey methods) at 26 major river basins, during flood/drought events, and for sea-level rise. Our results showcase the model's superior performance and its capability to accurately predict data gaps at both grid and basin scales globally.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101147,"journal":{"name":"Science of Remote Sensing","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 100198"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science of Remote Sensing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666017225000045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) and GRACE Follow-On (GFO) missions have provided valuable data for monitoring global terrestrial water storage anomalies (TWSA) over the past two decades. However, the nearly one-year gap between these missions pose challenges for long-term TWSA measurements and various applications. Unlike previous studies, we use a combination of Machine Learning (ML) methods—Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGB), Deep Neural Network (DNN), and Stacked Long-Short Term Memory (SLSTM)—to identify and efficiently bridge the gap between GRACE and GFO by using the best-performing ML model to estimate TWSA at each grid cell. The models were trained using six hydroclimatic variables (temperature, precipitation, runoff, evapotranspiration, ERA5-Land derived TWSA, and cumulative water storage change), as well as a vegetation index and timing variables, to reconstruct global land TWSA at 0.5° grid resolution. We evaluated the performance of each model using Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE), Pearson's Correlation Coefficient (PCC), and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE). Our results demonstrate test accuracy with area weighted average NSE, PCC, and RMSE of 0.51 ± 0.31, 0.71 ± 0.23, and 4.75 ± 3.63 cm, respectively. The model's performance was further compared across five climatic zones, with two previously reconstructed products (Li and Humphrey methods) at 26 major river basins, during flood/drought events, and for sea-level rise. Our results showcase the model's superior performance and its capability to accurately predict data gaps at both grid and basin scales globally.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
结合机器学习算法,利用ERA5-Land再分析弥合GRACE和GRACE后续任务的差距
重力恢复与气候实验(GRACE)和GRACE后续任务(GFO)在过去二十年中为监测全球陆地储水异常(TWSA)提供了宝贵的数据。然而,这些任务之间近一年的间隔给TWSA的长期测量和各种应用带来了挑战。与以前的研究不同,我们使用机器学习(ML)方法的组合-随机森林(RF),支持向量机(SVM),极限梯度增强(XGB),深度神经网络(DNN)和堆叠长短期记忆(SLSTM) -通过使用性能最佳的ML模型来估计每个网格单元的TWSA,识别并有效地弥合GRACE和GFO之间的差距。该模型使用6个水文气候变量(温度、降水、径流、蒸散发、ERA5-Land衍生的TWSA和累积蓄水量变化)以及植被指数和时间变量进行训练,以0.5°网格分辨率重建全球陆地TWSA。我们使用Nash-Sutcliffe效率(NSE)、Pearson相关系数(PCC)和均方根误差(RMSE)来评估每个模型的性能。结果表明,面积加权平均NSE、PCC和RMSE分别为0.51±0.31、0.71±0.23和4.75±3.63 cm,测试精度较高。该模型的性能在五个气候带之间进行了进一步的比较,并在26个主要河流流域、洪水/干旱事件期间和海平面上升期间使用了两种先前重建的产品(Li和Humphrey方法)。我们的结果展示了该模型的卓越性能及其在全球网格和流域尺度上准确预测数据缺口的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Spatiotemporal evaluation of downscaled and native high-resolution satellite soil moisture products Exploring the potential of Harmonized Landsat-Sentinel-2 in predicting boreal forest structure from UAV-LiDAR data in Northwestern America Estimating forest surface fuel loads along the China–Mongolia border using a multi-source remote sensing model optimized by active learning Unraveling a hidden effective signal in leaf hyperspectral reflectance data Incorporating learned geospatial embeddings to deep image prior for inpainting cloud areas in remotely sensed images
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1