{"title":"A comparative study of high and low order neutronics calculation models in microreactors","authors":"Xiangyue Li, Qizheng Sun, Xiaojing Liu, Xiang Chai, Hui He, Tengfei Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.anucene.2025.111205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Microreactors, characterized by their complex geometries, distinctive neutron spectrum and spatial distributions, pose significant challenges for deterministic nuclear reactor core calculations. Conventional simulation methods, such as assembly homogenization techniques, are commonly employed in microreactor simulations but often fail to fully capture their complexities. To obtain high-resolution simulation, this paper explores two different types of neutronics calculation models based on an explicit description of the reactor core geometry: a high-order model that incorporates multi-group cross-sections and neutron transport calculations, and a low-order model that utilizes few-group cross-sections with the Super-homogenization (SPH) correction and neutron diffusion calculations. Initially, an extensive error analysis is conducted on the low-order model by varying the energy group structure and spatial region division. Subsequently, the high-order and low-order models are compared. The findings indicate that the high-order model achieves superior computational accuracy, with a <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>k</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>eff</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> error of −75 pcm, and maximum relative errors and root mean square relative errors (RRMSE) of power at 3.8% and 1.1%, respectively. In contrast, the initial maximum relative power error and RRMSE using the uncorrected low-order model are 10.1% and 2.7%, respectively. After implementing the SPH method, the low-order model reduces these errors to 7.1% and 1.8%, respectively. Moreover, the low-order model demonstrates substantial improvements in memory usage and computational speed, with enhancements of 385-time and 247-time, respectively. Thus, the low-order model offers a balanced approach by enhancing accuracy compared to conventional diffusion calculation model while maintaining efficient resource usage, achieving higher accuracy in power distribution results at a lower computational cost.</div><div>Conventional simulation methods, such as assembly homogenization techniques, are commonly employed in microreactor simulations but often fail to fully capture their complexities. To obtain high-resolution simulation, this paper explores two neutronics calculation models: a high-order model that incorporates multi-group cross-sections and neutron transport calculations, and a low-order model that utilizes few-group cross-sections with the Super-homogenization (SPH) correction and neutron diffusion calculations. The findings indicate that the high-order model achieves superior computational accuracy, with a <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>k</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>eff</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> error of −75 pcm, and root mean square relative errors of power at 1.1%. After implementing the SPH method, the low-order model reduces the diffusion errors to 102 pcm and 1.8%, respectively. Moreover, the low-order model improves 385-time memory usage and 247-time computational speed. Thus, the low-order model offers a balanced approach by enhancing accuracy compared to conventional diffusion calculation model while maintaining efficient resource usage.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8006,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Nuclear Energy","volume":"215 ","pages":"Article 111205"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Nuclear Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306454925000222","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Microreactors, characterized by their complex geometries, distinctive neutron spectrum and spatial distributions, pose significant challenges for deterministic nuclear reactor core calculations. Conventional simulation methods, such as assembly homogenization techniques, are commonly employed in microreactor simulations but often fail to fully capture their complexities. To obtain high-resolution simulation, this paper explores two different types of neutronics calculation models based on an explicit description of the reactor core geometry: a high-order model that incorporates multi-group cross-sections and neutron transport calculations, and a low-order model that utilizes few-group cross-sections with the Super-homogenization (SPH) correction and neutron diffusion calculations. Initially, an extensive error analysis is conducted on the low-order model by varying the energy group structure and spatial region division. Subsequently, the high-order and low-order models are compared. The findings indicate that the high-order model achieves superior computational accuracy, with a error of −75 pcm, and maximum relative errors and root mean square relative errors (RRMSE) of power at 3.8% and 1.1%, respectively. In contrast, the initial maximum relative power error and RRMSE using the uncorrected low-order model are 10.1% and 2.7%, respectively. After implementing the SPH method, the low-order model reduces these errors to 7.1% and 1.8%, respectively. Moreover, the low-order model demonstrates substantial improvements in memory usage and computational speed, with enhancements of 385-time and 247-time, respectively. Thus, the low-order model offers a balanced approach by enhancing accuracy compared to conventional diffusion calculation model while maintaining efficient resource usage, achieving higher accuracy in power distribution results at a lower computational cost.
Conventional simulation methods, such as assembly homogenization techniques, are commonly employed in microreactor simulations but often fail to fully capture their complexities. To obtain high-resolution simulation, this paper explores two neutronics calculation models: a high-order model that incorporates multi-group cross-sections and neutron transport calculations, and a low-order model that utilizes few-group cross-sections with the Super-homogenization (SPH) correction and neutron diffusion calculations. The findings indicate that the high-order model achieves superior computational accuracy, with a error of −75 pcm, and root mean square relative errors of power at 1.1%. After implementing the SPH method, the low-order model reduces the diffusion errors to 102 pcm and 1.8%, respectively. Moreover, the low-order model improves 385-time memory usage and 247-time computational speed. Thus, the low-order model offers a balanced approach by enhancing accuracy compared to conventional diffusion calculation model while maintaining efficient resource usage.
期刊介绍:
Annals of Nuclear Energy provides an international medium for the communication of original research, ideas and developments in all areas of the field of nuclear energy science and technology. Its scope embraces nuclear fuel reserves, fuel cycles and cost, materials, processing, system and component technology (fission only), design and optimization, direct conversion of nuclear energy sources, environmental control, reactor physics, heat transfer and fluid dynamics, structural analysis, fuel management, future developments, nuclear fuel and safety, nuclear aerosol, neutron physics, computer technology (both software and hardware), risk assessment, radioactive waste disposal and reactor thermal hydraulics. Papers submitted to Annals need to demonstrate a clear link to nuclear power generation/nuclear engineering. Papers which deal with pure nuclear physics, pure health physics, imaging, or attenuation and shielding properties of concretes and various geological materials are not within the scope of the journal. Also, papers that deal with policy or economics are not within the scope of the journal.