Rationalized equivalence method for high-velocity impacts of composite and metal panels

IF 7.1 2区 材料科学 Q1 MATERIALS SCIENCE, COMPOSITES Composite Structures Pub Date : 2025-02-04 DOI:10.1016/j.compstruct.2025.118910
Chunlin Du , Junchao Cao , Yejie Qiao , Zhenqiang Zhao , Jun Xing , Chao Zhang
{"title":"Rationalized equivalence method for high-velocity impacts of composite and metal panels","authors":"Chunlin Du ,&nbsp;Junchao Cao ,&nbsp;Yejie Qiao ,&nbsp;Zhenqiang Zhao ,&nbsp;Jun Xing ,&nbsp;Chao Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.compstruct.2025.118910","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Carbon fibre-reinforced polymer (CFRP) composites and metals materials are widely used for impact protection of aerospace structures. This study aims to compare the energy absorption characteristics of metal panels and composite panels and to establish a method to compare the equivalence of impacts. A novel method for assessing the equivalence of impact energies of metallic and composite materials was developed and validated. This method demonstrates high accuracy in predicting the energy absorption equivalence of Al2024 and Ti64 panels of varying thicknesses to composite panels under different impact velocities. The experimental and numerical results confirm the predictive accuracy of the theoretical model. By combining experimental data with validated numerical model calculations for heterogeneous materials, the method efficiently determines the unknown parameters in the formulation, enabling equivalent thickness values for metal target panels to be derived across a broad range of impact velocities. The dimensionless area density ratio Π<em><sub>AD</sub></em> and velocity ratio Π<em><sub>V</sub></em> are introduced to describe the relationship between normalized thickness and velocity. This comparison reveals that Ti64 exhibits greater impact resistance compared to Al2024, and CFRP woven laminate panels outperform both Ti64 and Al2024 panels in energy absorption when area density ratio Π<em><sub>AD</sub></em> &gt; 1.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":281,"journal":{"name":"Composite Structures","volume":"357 ","pages":"Article 118910"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Composite Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263822325000753","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, COMPOSITES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Carbon fibre-reinforced polymer (CFRP) composites and metals materials are widely used for impact protection of aerospace structures. This study aims to compare the energy absorption characteristics of metal panels and composite panels and to establish a method to compare the equivalence of impacts. A novel method for assessing the equivalence of impact energies of metallic and composite materials was developed and validated. This method demonstrates high accuracy in predicting the energy absorption equivalence of Al2024 and Ti64 panels of varying thicknesses to composite panels under different impact velocities. The experimental and numerical results confirm the predictive accuracy of the theoretical model. By combining experimental data with validated numerical model calculations for heterogeneous materials, the method efficiently determines the unknown parameters in the formulation, enabling equivalent thickness values for metal target panels to be derived across a broad range of impact velocities. The dimensionless area density ratio ΠAD and velocity ratio ΠV are introduced to describe the relationship between normalized thickness and velocity. This comparison reveals that Ti64 exhibits greater impact resistance compared to Al2024, and CFRP woven laminate panels outperform both Ti64 and Al2024 panels in energy absorption when area density ratio ΠAD > 1.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
复合材料与金属板高速碰撞的合理化等效法
碳纤维增强聚合物(CFRP)复合材料和金属材料广泛应用于航空航天结构的冲击防护。本研究旨在比较金属板和复合板的吸能特性,建立一种比较冲击等效性的方法。提出并验证了一种评估金属和复合材料冲击能等效性的新方法。该方法在预测不同冲击速度下不同厚度Al2024和Ti64板对复合材料板的能量吸收等效性方面具有较高的准确性。实验和数值结果验证了理论模型的预测精度。通过将实验数据与经过验证的非均质材料数值模型计算相结合,该方法有效地确定了公式中的未知参数,从而可以在很宽的冲击速度范围内推导出金属靶板的等效厚度值。引入无因次面积密度比ΠAD和速度比ΠV来描述归一化厚度与速度的关系。对比表明,Ti64的抗冲击性能优于Al2024,当面积密度比ΠAD >时,CFRP编织层压板的吸能性能优于Ti64和Al2024;1.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Composite Structures
Composite Structures 工程技术-材料科学:复合
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
12.70%
发文量
1246
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: The past few decades have seen outstanding advances in the use of composite materials in structural applications. There can be little doubt that, within engineering circles, composites have revolutionised traditional design concepts and made possible an unparalleled range of new and exciting possibilities as viable materials for construction. Composite Structures, an International Journal, disseminates knowledge between users, manufacturers, designers and researchers involved in structures or structural components manufactured using composite materials. The journal publishes papers which contribute to knowledge in the use of composite materials in engineering structures. Papers deal with design, research and development studies, experimental investigations, theoretical analysis and fabrication techniques relevant to the application of composites in load-bearing components for assemblies, ranging from individual components such as plates and shells to complete composite structures.
期刊最新文献
Estimation of residual stress in carbon fibre composite laminate using the contour method Magnetic field distribution of unidirectional carbon fiber fabric under direct current The static and dynamic analysis of the functionally graded magneto-electro-thermo-elastic multi-physical system based on the finite block method The role of steel fibers in the bond behavior of CFRP-UHPFRC joints: A mesoscale finite element study Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1