Effects of reduced-exertion high-intensity training versus short moderate-intensity continuous training on biomarkers of mortality risk in sedentary women: A randomized clinical trial

IF 1.4 Q3 REHABILITATION JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-02 DOI:10.1016/j.jbmt.2025.01.056
Heba Bahey Eldin , Hady Atef , Elena Muñoz-Gómez , Noemí Moreno-Segura , Sarah ElZalabany , Raghad Alanazi , Wagd Alruwili , Sarah Alruwili , Shaza Sultan , Elena Marques-Sule
{"title":"Effects of reduced-exertion high-intensity training versus short moderate-intensity continuous training on biomarkers of mortality risk in sedentary women: A randomized clinical trial","authors":"Heba Bahey Eldin ,&nbsp;Hady Atef ,&nbsp;Elena Muñoz-Gómez ,&nbsp;Noemí Moreno-Segura ,&nbsp;Sarah ElZalabany ,&nbsp;Raghad Alanazi ,&nbsp;Wagd Alruwili ,&nbsp;Sarah Alruwili ,&nbsp;Shaza Sultan ,&nbsp;Elena Marques-Sule","doi":"10.1016/j.jbmt.2025.01.056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>This study aimed to compare the effects of reduced-exertion high-intensity training (REHIT) versus short moderate-intensity continuous training (SMICT) on functional capacity, resting heart rate (RHR), and activity enjoyment in sedentary women.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Thirty sedentary young women were randomly allocated to a: i) REHIT group (n = 15) or ii) SMICT group (n = 15) (2 sessions/week, 6 weeks) using a computer-generated random allocation sequence. Both groups performed an intervention on a cycle ergometer that included a warm-up (3 min at 50% of HRmax), the main part of the session, and a cool-down (3 min at 50% of HRmax). The main part in REHIT consists of 20–40 s divided on two maximum cycling sprints of all-out exercise at 100% of HRmax with an active rest of 3 min between them; whilst SMICT consisted of 6–12 min of moderate intensity exercise at 60–70% of HRmax. Functional capacity (6-min walking test) and RHR were measured before and after the intervention. Physical activity enjoyment (Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale) was assessed after the intervention.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The effects of the REHIT on functional capacity showed a significant interaction between time measurement and intervention group (p &lt; 0.001) that not occurred in RHR (p &gt; 0.05). Intragroup post-hoc analysis revealed that both groups improve their values in functional capacity and RHR (p &lt; 0.05). Between-groups comparison showed that REHIT group increased significantly functional capacity more than SMICT (p = 0.002). In addition, physical activity enjoyment scores were high in both groups without differences.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>REHIT and SMICT are appropriate for improving functional capacity and RHR, as well as being perceived as enjoyable in sedentary young women. REHIT offers higher improvements in functional capacity.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical trial registration number</h3><div>NCT05875051.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51431,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","volume":"42 ","pages":"Pages 710-714"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360859225000567","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

This study aimed to compare the effects of reduced-exertion high-intensity training (REHIT) versus short moderate-intensity continuous training (SMICT) on functional capacity, resting heart rate (RHR), and activity enjoyment in sedentary women.

Methods

Thirty sedentary young women were randomly allocated to a: i) REHIT group (n = 15) or ii) SMICT group (n = 15) (2 sessions/week, 6 weeks) using a computer-generated random allocation sequence. Both groups performed an intervention on a cycle ergometer that included a warm-up (3 min at 50% of HRmax), the main part of the session, and a cool-down (3 min at 50% of HRmax). The main part in REHIT consists of 20–40 s divided on two maximum cycling sprints of all-out exercise at 100% of HRmax with an active rest of 3 min between them; whilst SMICT consisted of 6–12 min of moderate intensity exercise at 60–70% of HRmax. Functional capacity (6-min walking test) and RHR were measured before and after the intervention. Physical activity enjoyment (Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale) was assessed after the intervention.

Results

The effects of the REHIT on functional capacity showed a significant interaction between time measurement and intervention group (p < 0.001) that not occurred in RHR (p > 0.05). Intragroup post-hoc analysis revealed that both groups improve their values in functional capacity and RHR (p < 0.05). Between-groups comparison showed that REHIT group increased significantly functional capacity more than SMICT (p = 0.002). In addition, physical activity enjoyment scores were high in both groups without differences.

Conclusion

REHIT and SMICT are appropriate for improving functional capacity and RHR, as well as being perceived as enjoyable in sedentary young women. REHIT offers higher improvements in functional capacity.

Clinical trial registration number

NCT05875051.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
低强度高强度训练与短时间中等强度连续训练对久坐女性死亡风险生物标志物的影响:一项随机临床试验
本研究旨在比较低强度高强度训练(REHIT)与短时间中等强度连续训练(SMICT)对久坐女性功能能力、静息心率(RHR)和活动享受的影响。方法采用计算机生成的随机分配顺序,将30名久坐不动的年轻女性随机分为:i) REHIT组(n = 15)或ii) SMICT组(n = 15)(2次/周,6周)。两组都在一个循环计力器上进行干预,包括热身(50% HRmax时3分钟),主要部分,和冷却(50% HRmax时3分钟)。REHIT的主要部分包括20-40秒,分为两次最大循环冲刺,以100% HRmax全力运动,中间休息3分钟;而SMICT包括6-12分钟的中等强度运动,HRmax的60-70%。干预前后分别测定功能能力(6分钟步行测验)和RHR。干预后评估身体活动享受(身体活动享受量表)。结果REHIT对功能能力的影响在时间测量组和干预组之间存在显著的交互作用(p <;0.001),在RHR中没有发生(p >;0.05)。组内事后分析显示,两组患者的功能能力和RHR值均有所提高(p <;0.05)。组间比较显示,REHIT组功能能力明显高于SMICT组(p = 0.002)。此外,两组的体育活动享受得分均较高,但无差异。结论rehit和SMICT可有效改善年轻久坐女性的功能能力和RHR,并具有良好的治疗效果。REHIT在功能容量方面提供了更高的改进。临床试验注册号:bernct05875051。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
133
审稿时长
321 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies brings you the latest therapeutic techniques and current professional debate. Publishing highly illustrated articles on a wide range of subjects this journal is immediately relevant to everyday clinical practice in private, community and primary health care settings. Techiques featured include: • Physical Therapy • Osteopathy • Chiropractic • Massage Therapy • Structural Integration • Feldenkrais • Yoga Therapy • Dance • Physiotherapy • Pilates • Alexander Technique • Shiatsu and Tuina
期刊最新文献
Cost-effectiveness analysis of adding dry needling to physical therapy for chronic neck pain in upper trapezius myofascial pain syndrome Is there a relationship between kinesiophobia and the functional capacity of women with knee osteoarthritis? Wearable technologies in neurorehabilitation and cardiac rehabilitation: A narrative review Leveraging technology-based interventions with varying levels of immersion for the assessment of low back pain: a scoping review Factors associated with chronic low back pain and central sensitization in office workers: a multidimensional analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1