Effects of reduced-exertion high-intensity training versus short moderate-intensity continuous training on biomarkers of mortality risk in sedentary women: A randomized clinical trial
Heba Bahey Eldin , Hady Atef , Elena Muñoz-Gómez , Noemí Moreno-Segura , Sarah ElZalabany , Raghad Alanazi , Wagd Alruwili , Sarah Alruwili , Shaza Sultan , Elena Marques-Sule
{"title":"Effects of reduced-exertion high-intensity training versus short moderate-intensity continuous training on biomarkers of mortality risk in sedentary women: A randomized clinical trial","authors":"Heba Bahey Eldin , Hady Atef , Elena Muñoz-Gómez , Noemí Moreno-Segura , Sarah ElZalabany , Raghad Alanazi , Wagd Alruwili , Sarah Alruwili , Shaza Sultan , Elena Marques-Sule","doi":"10.1016/j.jbmt.2025.01.056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>This study aimed to compare the effects of reduced-exertion high-intensity training (REHIT) versus short moderate-intensity continuous training (SMICT) on functional capacity, resting heart rate (RHR), and activity enjoyment in sedentary women.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Thirty sedentary young women were randomly allocated to a: i) REHIT group (n = 15) or ii) SMICT group (n = 15) (2 sessions/week, 6 weeks) using a computer-generated random allocation sequence. Both groups performed an intervention on a cycle ergometer that included a warm-up (3 min at 50% of HRmax), the main part of the session, and a cool-down (3 min at 50% of HRmax). The main part in REHIT consists of 20–40 s divided on two maximum cycling sprints of all-out exercise at 100% of HRmax with an active rest of 3 min between them; whilst SMICT consisted of 6–12 min of moderate intensity exercise at 60–70% of HRmax. Functional capacity (6-min walking test) and RHR were measured before and after the intervention. Physical activity enjoyment (Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale) was assessed after the intervention.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The effects of the REHIT on functional capacity showed a significant interaction between time measurement and intervention group (p < 0.001) that not occurred in RHR (p > 0.05). Intragroup post-hoc analysis revealed that both groups improve their values in functional capacity and RHR (p < 0.05). Between-groups comparison showed that REHIT group increased significantly functional capacity more than SMICT (p = 0.002). In addition, physical activity enjoyment scores were high in both groups without differences.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>REHIT and SMICT are appropriate for improving functional capacity and RHR, as well as being perceived as enjoyable in sedentary young women. REHIT offers higher improvements in functional capacity.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical trial registration number</h3><div>NCT05875051.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51431,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","volume":"42 ","pages":"Pages 710-714"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360859225000567","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
This study aimed to compare the effects of reduced-exertion high-intensity training (REHIT) versus short moderate-intensity continuous training (SMICT) on functional capacity, resting heart rate (RHR), and activity enjoyment in sedentary women.
Methods
Thirty sedentary young women were randomly allocated to a: i) REHIT group (n = 15) or ii) SMICT group (n = 15) (2 sessions/week, 6 weeks) using a computer-generated random allocation sequence. Both groups performed an intervention on a cycle ergometer that included a warm-up (3 min at 50% of HRmax), the main part of the session, and a cool-down (3 min at 50% of HRmax). The main part in REHIT consists of 20–40 s divided on two maximum cycling sprints of all-out exercise at 100% of HRmax with an active rest of 3 min between them; whilst SMICT consisted of 6–12 min of moderate intensity exercise at 60–70% of HRmax. Functional capacity (6-min walking test) and RHR were measured before and after the intervention. Physical activity enjoyment (Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale) was assessed after the intervention.
Results
The effects of the REHIT on functional capacity showed a significant interaction between time measurement and intervention group (p < 0.001) that not occurred in RHR (p > 0.05). Intragroup post-hoc analysis revealed that both groups improve their values in functional capacity and RHR (p < 0.05). Between-groups comparison showed that REHIT group increased significantly functional capacity more than SMICT (p = 0.002). In addition, physical activity enjoyment scores were high in both groups without differences.
Conclusion
REHIT and SMICT are appropriate for improving functional capacity and RHR, as well as being perceived as enjoyable in sedentary young women. REHIT offers higher improvements in functional capacity.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies brings you the latest therapeutic techniques and current professional debate. Publishing highly illustrated articles on a wide range of subjects this journal is immediately relevant to everyday clinical practice in private, community and primary health care settings. Techiques featured include: • Physical Therapy • Osteopathy • Chiropractic • Massage Therapy • Structural Integration • Feldenkrais • Yoga Therapy • Dance • Physiotherapy • Pilates • Alexander Technique • Shiatsu and Tuina