Testing the waters: Plant working and seafaring in Pleistocene Wallacea

IF 1.5 2区 历史学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-08 DOI:10.1016/j.jasrep.2025.105020
Riczar Fuentes , Alfred Pawlik
{"title":"Testing the waters: Plant working and seafaring in Pleistocene Wallacea","authors":"Riczar Fuentes ,&nbsp;Alfred Pawlik","doi":"10.1016/j.jasrep.2025.105020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>While the presence of fossils and artefacts provide ample evidence that early modern humans were able to cross the open sea, the very circumstances of why and how they moved into and across Island Southeast Asia (ISEA), and particularly the Wallacean region, remain to be addressed. In this paper we explore the connection between traces of plant working and boatbuilding in coastal sites during the Pleistocene to infer how prehistoric people migrated to and through the region. Artefactual evidence of watercrafts is missing in the archaeological record of the region as the maritime technology employed was most likely dominantly made of plants and its components have decayed over time. Nevertheless, various seacraft designs have been proposed for reaching the isolated island of the Wallacean archipelago. In theoretical and experimental considerations, the focus has usually been on bamboo rafts as the main seacraft design, probably inspired by the so-called ‘bamboo hypothesis’. The identification of boat building materials through direct or indirect evidence is vital in understanding movements across and within island environments. In this paper, we argue that experimentation and traceology can address questions on prehistoric sea crossings, with a focus on the connection between traces of prehistoric plant processing and seacrafts that were potentially used in ISEA – arguably an indication of behavioural modernity. We highlight the role of plant working, specifically the extraction of fibres, for making cord work and related objects in ISEA during the Late Pleistocene and the possibility of identifying such activities through use-wear and residue analysis. Overall, we contextualise the current state of research on direct and indirect pieces of evidence for prehistoric plant technology in Wallacea in relation to seafaring, island connections, and maritime-based subsistence.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48150,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports","volume":"62 ","pages":"Article 105020"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352409X25000525","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While the presence of fossils and artefacts provide ample evidence that early modern humans were able to cross the open sea, the very circumstances of why and how they moved into and across Island Southeast Asia (ISEA), and particularly the Wallacean region, remain to be addressed. In this paper we explore the connection between traces of plant working and boatbuilding in coastal sites during the Pleistocene to infer how prehistoric people migrated to and through the region. Artefactual evidence of watercrafts is missing in the archaeological record of the region as the maritime technology employed was most likely dominantly made of plants and its components have decayed over time. Nevertheless, various seacraft designs have been proposed for reaching the isolated island of the Wallacean archipelago. In theoretical and experimental considerations, the focus has usually been on bamboo rafts as the main seacraft design, probably inspired by the so-called ‘bamboo hypothesis’. The identification of boat building materials through direct or indirect evidence is vital in understanding movements across and within island environments. In this paper, we argue that experimentation and traceology can address questions on prehistoric sea crossings, with a focus on the connection between traces of prehistoric plant processing and seacrafts that were potentially used in ISEA – arguably an indication of behavioural modernity. We highlight the role of plant working, specifically the extraction of fibres, for making cord work and related objects in ISEA during the Late Pleistocene and the possibility of identifying such activities through use-wear and residue analysis. Overall, we contextualise the current state of research on direct and indirect pieces of evidence for prehistoric plant technology in Wallacea in relation to seafaring, island connections, and maritime-based subsistence.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
试水:更新世Wallacea的植物工作和航海
虽然化石和人工制品的存在为早期现代人能够跨越公海提供了充分的证据,但他们为什么以及如何进入和跨越东南亚岛屿(ISEA),特别是华莱士地区的具体情况仍有待解决。在本文中,我们探索了更新世期间沿海地区植物工作和造船痕迹之间的联系,以推断史前人类如何迁移到该地区并通过该地区。该地区的考古记录中缺少船只的人工证据,因为所使用的海事技术很可能主要由植物制成,其成分随着时间的推移已经腐烂。然而,为了到达瓦拉西亚群岛的孤岛,人们提出了各种各样的海船设计。在理论和实验考虑中,重点通常放在竹筏上作为主要的海船设计,可能是受到所谓的“竹假设”的启发。通过直接或间接证据确定造船材料对于了解岛屿环境之间和内部的运动至关重要。在本文中,我们认为实验和痕迹学可以解决史前海洋过境的问题,重点关注史前植物加工痕迹与ISEA可能使用的海船之间的联系-可以说是行为现代性的一个迹象。我们强调了植物加工的作用,特别是纤维的提取,在晚更新世期间在ISEA制作脐带和相关物品,以及通过使用磨损和残留物分析识别此类活动的可能性。总体而言,我们将Wallacea史前植物技术与航海、岛屿连接和海洋生存相关的直接和间接证据的研究现状置于背景下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
405
期刊介绍: Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports is aimed at archaeologists and scientists engaged with the application of scientific techniques and methodologies to all areas of archaeology. The journal focuses on the results of the application of scientific methods to archaeological problems and debates. It will provide a forum for reviews and scientific debate of issues in scientific archaeology and their impact in the wider subject. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports will publish papers of excellent archaeological science, with regional or wider interest. This will include case studies, reviews and short papers where an established scientific technique sheds light on archaeological questions and debates.
期刊最新文献
Assessing Ming Dynasty (1368–1644 CE) chicken husbandry at the Palace of Shu King: human-directed selection effects on body size and skeletal allometry Morphospace of bifacial leafpoints from the eponymous Palaeolithic sites of Sajóbábony and Szeleta Cave (Hungary) Geophysical and archaeological survey of the Hellenistic period settlement Iskandar Tepa in the Bactro-Sogdian borderlands Brass and high-tin bronze use at Siraf, a prosperous Persian Gulf port city of the late first millennium CE Petrographic and geochemical characterization of Eocene limestones from Thugga / Dougga (Tunisia): Implications for the provenance of stones used in construction and sculpture in the ancient town
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1